You disputed my 'argument', therefore you have to prove that there is true satisfaction in life, which you haven't.
No, I disputed your argument, so I have to prove that your argument is fallacious. I did so. I made no claim regarding my own position on the question outside of my choice of tags, which I have chosen not to defend.
Depends on your definition of life. I consider life as being something that is of this world, and most religions are faith based.
So your claim was that religion could bring you true satisfaction after you die, but that it wasn't possible for a religion or being religious to provide true satisfaction while you are still alive? You should really choose your words more carefully, then.