CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
Blah. What makes "shit" worse than "scat", "fuck" worse than "bone", or "copulate", or "screw", or "dammit"? What makes them curses other than the fact that somebody somewhere in some period of time decided that they didn't like the sound of the word.
There are certain things we hope not to hear out of our children's mouths.
For example it would trouble me more to hear my daughter call someone stupid , than it would to hear her exclaim "bullshit!"
A foul mouth by no means requires the use of taboo words. (have you noticed that?)
I think it's important often times to be willing and able to take the tone of the company you are in, and to be respectful of differing culture, etiquette and custom.
The same as calling some one a slut etc is not ok.
Name calling is very different to "cuss" words such as "bullshit" etc.
EG; I would take less offence if someone told me i was behaving in a slutty manner , IN FACT I WOULD REVIEW MYSELF.
However if they called me a slut , i would probably throw a few filthy words back at them , and etc.
It is funny but when certain types are in my company or nearby, i will not swear.Its what i call my "nun" switch....
eg The dear little old lady in the church that day , that day that i cracked, She put an instant stop to that tantrum i threw , had me flee in fear more then god himself. No way could i keep cussing at the "gods" with her prescence upon me.She did not deserve it. So i left.
PS - Sorry COlorMyWorld (for my outbursts)....................
It is nicer that a lady doesnt swear , but sometimes i cant help it.
You are not a silly girl , you can see for yourself the difference between what is right or wrong.
You may grow to be one of those more delightful swearers.
Someone who never swears , then suddenly out of the blue , it will slip.
And the whole room will stop in its tracks.
Those types of of unexpected cusses from the ones that dont generally swear , always brings a giggle to my belly and a satisfactory smile on my face , as it proves they are human.
YES I AGREE , of course to a degree. That is of course if ive managed to understand you correctly.
Basically if a kid is confronted by some other badass kid , and he does not have the ability to defend himself on at least somewhat of an even level , even as such as just using verbal defense , then the kid could be assumed a wuss and therefor render themselves a further target of ridicule and possibly worse........:)
Maybe. But you don't have to cuss to humiliate someone - like what i do to you somtimes.
Swearing - especially in public is contraversial. Fact of life. Some people think it's stupid and immature, others think that person's got balls. Either way it depends on the individual how they percieve swearing.
Cursing puts you in an angry mind set. If you resist cursing you are basically taking control over your anger, which is a good thing. Like the old man used to say, "The main thing is NOT to get excited."
No, cursing is the result of an angry mind set. It's a way of expressing that anger.
Repressing anger doesn't make it go away, it just makes it build up. Anger is a motivating force for change. It is a powerful tool to be wielded with care. You shouldn't let it control you, but you should use it when appropriate.
She believes to repress anger allows deseases or cancers to begin to grow.
This is why she believes i will never get cancer.
Because , even though i react in a whammy , i react in the moment , not the past of the future.
I do not let it fester for months while denying and disputing anyone who questions my mood , only to take them by suprise when i finally crack about something that has passed.
Although many times ,( i must be honest) , i have indeed gone off half-cocked in the heat of the moment , only to regret it later.
I guess its like how Joes' old man said "The main thing is NOT to get excited."
I myself have an appalling habit of cussing , but i usually only go off like a trooper if i have the shirty .
However , my children , are fully aware that i do not think it is appropriate social behaviour.
I understand that when kids get togeather (they get silly), unheard by their own parent/carer, sometimes just swear to be cool , or tough , or out of emotion .
(my kids are no exception.)
However , my kids will not swear at me , to me , but if they are relaying word for word , what someone has said to them, i can overlook it , if that means repeating a foul word.
My adult son ,like me , he can pull a beauty out in a flash , but he has more control .
Maybe setting myself as an example , taught him that to be dominantly profane is a turn off.
I am far from proud for the filth that comes out of my mouth , i am finding this harder a habit to quit than smoking.
I also have a degree of tourettes so it isnt easy , but im trying , hard .
The times where i am mostly stimulated to swear is when i have been offended by someones actions or words.
Sometimes it is a reflex as in as saying "shit" when i stub my toe.
Curses just make you look stupid if you don't know when it's appropriate to use them. Any parent that thinks it's wrong to just curse in general is a pussy, and theyre kid is gonna grow up being a pussy.
Thats a nice piece you wrote. Maybe next time you'd like to actually convey some kind of a point rather than just blogging about what you're currently thinking while writing. And I said any parent who thinks its wrong to curse in general, as in cursing is never allowed, is a pussy. I didn't say parents who don't curse are pussies. You're reading comprehension is terrible, learn how to read or shut the fuck up you moron.
Cussing is a good way of expressing strong feelings, especially anger. You shouldn't do it too often, but you should do it when it's appropriate.
The reason authorities don't want you to cuss is that cuss words are powerful. They influence people in a way that normal words can't. People like your parents or your preacher don't want you challenging their authority and will do everything they can to keep you weak. And that includes pressuring you not to cuss.
There is a very old dictionary which was published over 70 odd years ago. In this dictionary you will find words like "cunt" I LOATHE THIS WORD Ashamably ive let it slip out , and i cringe when i hear it come from me.
I Also am very fortunate to own an original copy of the "ORIGINAL STORIES FROM THE BROTHERS GRIMM"
In this little treasure is the story of what we now call "CINDERELLA"
Though it was originally titled "ASHPUTTEL" , the storyline is mostly the same.
In the part where Ashputel or "cindy" as we now know her , asks her stepmom if she too , may go to the ball , this is what the stepmoms "original" reply was ; " NO NO NO Ashputtel !, You may not go to the ball , you dirty little slut!" or words to that affect.
I have my book in storage but here is a link to this story Ashputtel.
The word "poof" is also an old word used to insult a person.
All i am saying , is that i notice some absurd , over-resistance , to the use of less degrading words as either of these three above.
And although most were brought about before you and i were born , why is there so much fuss today about their use ?
Is it perhaps that the person who introduced such words , had them thrown back in his face ?
btw , Shellby you sound just fine the way you are. Be proud of yourself.
Because in reality ,it makes us girls , not sound pretty , EG: just look at me for example , i am not ugly , but i sound putrid when i swear repulsively..and out of place.
I think it is wrong. I myself cuss, but i dont say f@%$. I Say f you in a funny way. i dont say thos strong words, only week ones like what the hell and all that stuff, not like b$%%S(&%.i am only 11.
"Okay so i have come up with a question that bothers me. I am 14 and yet i wanna know if it is wrong to curse? I mean i don't do it. Even at school. I am a follower of christ. But since church i never cussed. So what do you think?
Does it really matter?"
Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers Ephesians 4:29
But now ye also put off all these; anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy communication out of your mouth Colossians 3:8
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man Colossians 4:6
But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned Matthew 12:36-37
These are just a few verses among the many dealing with words. The Bible has alot to say on the topic. There are different kinds of judgements of which the Bible covers. However, the Christian will go through what is called "the Bema" or judgement seat of Christ (2 Cor. 5:10). Paul, the apostle said that the judgement will not deal with the individual's salvation. This is the purpose of the trial:
(1) For evaluating the works-2 Cor. 5:10; Matt. 6:1,2; 16:27
I don't think that there are to much of disagreement, only on a few things. Anger is indeed a "powerful tool", in fact, so powerful that we need to guard ourselves from allowing it to control us. On the other hand, repressing it is not healthy. So you have two extremes, one is not expressing it and the other is allowing it to build up in you. I think we can agree that anger is a very strong emotion and therefore, a need to express it wisely. Now, you made a point that I want to touch upon which is:
"The reason authorities don't want you to cuss is that cuss words are powerful. They influence people in a way that normal words can't"
It is true that certain words have great power because it solicit emotion. People will feel that power behind that word. Peter Parker made this statement, "With great power comes with great responsibility", right? Well, the Bible actually states just that. Now, if you notice I made it clear that I quoted "just a few", right? God’s Word contains principles regarding how to handle anger in a godly manner, and how to overcome sinful anger. Just to make it clear, I am not saying that anger is always sin.
An example: If an individual has an issue with with someone, Christ and than the apostle Paul explained in more detail the principles that I think is healthy and practical for a Christian:
1. Go to the person in privacy: Matt. 18:15
2. If the individual will not listen, than the Christian is to take witnesses with them: Matt. 18:16
3. If that person still does not listen to the Christian or the witnesses, than they are to go to the next step which is to bring it to the attention of the Church: Matt. 18:17
4. If that person still refuses to listen to the Christian, witnesses, and the Church, than that individual is regarded as one who is out of fellowship: Matt. 18:17
Now, these are guidelines/principles that Christians are to go by. Of course not all issues are that serious. So, it may just go from point 1 to 2 and just move on. If anything, the article provided actually demonstrates that what the Bible teach is healthy and practical. In addition, businesses apply this concept known as "the Open Door Policy" in order to reduce conflict and reconcile, right? The previous verses that I gave clearly teach that within the guidelines, when confronting the another person, they are to have this kind of attitude and how to express themselves. The one thing that I do not agree is that it is proper for a Christian to use words that are energized, as you acknowledged has power behind it, which adds to the problem rather than solve it. Which Proverbs 15:1 along with the previous verses that I gave teach the Christian:
"A soft answer turns away wrath,But a harsh word stirs up anger"
I really do not see how your statement "In other words: Don't challenge us. Do what you're told. Obey. Religion was such an easy way for the powerful to control" the masses would be an issue.
I agree with some of what You say but as for the rest as i have tried in vain before to say preaching is rude , You can downbomb me again , thats ok but i still beleive that the bible quotes are corrupted; http://www.amazon.com/Witches-Bible-Complete-Handbook/dp/0919345921 HOW DO YOU LIKE IT! I can dig out stuff too from this bible that is not near as condemning as the rest. btw this is not my bible. You ought to read it. Personally to me with how i feel about religion , i dont want to call what i believe in a religion.Nor with how abused "gods" gift is do i wish to waste anymore time reading some god fearing or devil worshipping or even a witches book . I have already done that religiously . No , Now i keep my relationship with "god" personal. Very personal , in fact its a secret .
I am really sorry that you cant see , that YOUR oppinion will always be more important to me than your bible phrases. All you make me feel like doing is jumping up on a milk crate in the plaza ,pointing at preists and telling them they are going to hell. You obviously agree with your bible .It is evident in how you downpoint every person you judge is wrong. A true reflection of why i dont like preachers who strongly push their religion onto others. They do the greatest sin of all , by judging and condemning. They have no right to play god like this. Most religions say the same thing , even that bit about all the other religions being wrong. Why cant everyone see that god is within , god is without. So how can one ever be in doubt? Dont you feel ? Dont you know? You may judge me all you like flame but i will not change my belief. Not after all these years and seeing and learning , can i lift my humble stance. I know my guilts and so does my god. The day if "god" starts to come looking , for me in order to punish me , shall not be so bad surely. Surely . NATURE HOWEVER , OBVIOUSLY CAN BE BRUTAL. But what god would cause such A messed up world. None! it is you and me and all other humans we see .AND OF COURSE SHIT HAPPENS!
Your four step process seems like a pretty time consuming way to express anger. Even just speaking to someone in private could be more trouble than it's worth. I think just saying "Fuck you." is a much more quick and easy way to get the point across.
Also, what happens if step 4 doesn't work? What if they have other friends and don't care if they are shunned by your fellowship? At that point do you just give up?
I think you're missing the link between cussing and dominance. Social dominance is an integral part of human psychology. Cussing is a way to assert that dominance; it is used to signal power. There are a lot of situations, especially when dealing with less educated people, where if you don't cuss, you don't matter.
Actually I think Christianity in general glosses over issues of social dominance. Turning the other cheek doesn't work when dealing with assholes. In fact, it's a good way to get yourself crucified.
I don't really see the point of linking to the APA article. I think we both agree with everything it says.
I guess I have to agree that if you're a Christian you should not cuss. But I think that's a flaw of the Christian religion, and the proper response is to not be a Christian.
"our four step process seems like a pretty time consuming way to express anger"
1. I mentioned that "If an individual has an issue with someone, Christ and than the apostle Paul explained in more detail the principles that I think is healthy and practical for a Christian" and "(within the guidelines), when confronting the another person, they are to have this kind of attitude and how to express themselves"
Principle: •noun 1 a fundamental truth or proposition serving as the foundation for belief or action. 2 a rule or belief governing one’s personal behaviour. 3 morally correct behaviour and attitudes (Compact Oxford English Dictionary)
That is to say, the principles is in reference to the reconciliation process. In other words, they are used as a basis/foundation for conduct or action. Therefore, it is not always in that order necessarily. Where as, the attitude and the expression of anger is another thing altogether. According to the Bible, anger is properly used when it’s a positive means of letting others know your thoughts and desires, while communicating in a respectful manner. For what purpose? To be used for good and to create change. That is being assertive (Matt. 18:15). As you know, you agreed with the evidence provided by the APA in which it states, "Expressing your angry feelings in an assertive—not aggressive—manner is the healthiest way to express anger. To do this, you have to learn how to make clear what your needs are, and how to get them met, without hurting others. Being assertive doesn't mean being pushy or demanding; it means being respectful of yourself and others."
"Even just speaking to someone in private could be more trouble than it's worth"
2. Than the reconciliation process does not apply to you if it is "more trouble than it's worth."If anything it creates "problems at work, in your personal relationships, and in the overall quality of your life"1 That is totally up to you if you wish to create problems for yourself socially, psychologically and physically.
"I think just saying "Fuck you." is a much more quick and easy way to get the point across" Again, that is totally up to you, at your own risk and discretion, lol. In fact, the APA made this statement in regards to "just letting it all out", "Psychologists now say that this is a dangerous myth. Some people use this theory as a license to hurt others. Research has found that 'letting it rip' with anger actually escalates anger and aggression and does nothing to help you (or the person you're angry with) resolve the situation.2
Someone with a quick temper does foolish things, but someone with understanding remains calm Prov. 14:17 (CEV)
A fool vents all his feelings, But a wise man holds them back Prov 29:11 (NKJV)
Now for the Christian, the Bible states:
Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have "gained your brother" (Matt. 18:15)
In other words, it is very much great gain to win my brother in Christ not simply for the purpose of pointing out the sin he/she committed, but 1. that sin committed created a gap in our relationship and thus violated the law of Christ. 2. It does not just stop there, but also if he/she will have trouble with his prayer and fellowship with God.
Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ Gal. 6:2
If someone says, “I love God,” and hates his brother, he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen, how can he love God whom he has not seen? And this commandment we have from Him: that he who loves God must love his brother also
1 John 4:20-21
Christ made it very clear that one of the evidences of discipleship is the love principle:
"By this all will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another (John 13:35).
"Also, what happens if step 4 doesn't work?"
3. You made this statement "Even just speaking to someone in private could be more trouble than it's worth."It would be of no interest for you to even go this far, right? Now for the Christian, I did mentioned that there are two purpose which are:
1. That sin committed created a gap in our relationship and thus violated the law of Christ.
2. It does not just stop there, but also if he/she will have trouble with his prayer and fellowship with God.
I think that it is important to also understand the Bible teaches that the Christian should learn to overlook some offenses. Not every offense is worth talking to the person about because it may not be that serious. These principles can be abused. Can't always go to the person every time feelings are hurt. It has to be more than just "our feelings being hurt." Whether or not it is more than that, no one knows better than that Christian. This is where the Christian needs to learn to use wisdom in which the Bible encourages him/her to ask God in regard to the matter as well as what the Bible teach in regard to the sin or offense.
"Good sense makes a man restrain his anger, and it is his glory to overlook a transgression or an offense" Prov. 19:11 (AMP)
"But if any of you needs wisdom, you should ask God for it. He is generous to everyone and will give you wisdom without criticizing you" James 1:5
"What if they have other friends and don't care if they are shunned by your fellowship? At that point do you just give up?"
4. Now, I mentioned on number 3 concerning two things which are:
1. That sin committed created a gap in our relationship and thus violated the law of Christ.
2. It does not just stop there, but also if he/she will have trouble with his prayer and fellowship with God.
3. Petty offense that can be overlooked.
Let number 3 represent a personal offense or just "hurt feelings" between two Christians that may not affect their prayer and fellowship with God. Now, let us say hypothetically that the principles were applied because of number 1 and 2 and that Christian "don't care if they are shunned by your fellowship"*.
Example: A Christian who owned an auto-shop was entrusted with my car because the serpentine belt snapped and the motor was completely destroyed. I made reasonable payments every other week and stayed in touch in order to know the status of my car. However, it was recently discovered by his business partner that this Christian stole money from the register and my money for drugs.
The principles were applied, but he could care less that he was not in fellowship with me and the local church because of his grievous sin. That is, he would be treated not as a brother, but as an outsider because he stepped out of fellowship willingly and could careless for it. However, every effort would be made to reconcile knowing that we can only do so much from our part since he has a free will. That is, also keeping him in prayer for God to have mercy on him and to open his eyes.
According to the research conducted in Jan. 17 to Feb. 6, 2005,
I. How do Teens handle anger?
a. Walk away/Ignore it: Boys 24%-Girls 20%->Total:22%
b. Exercise/Get some kind of physical exercise: 16% Boys-Girls 20%->Total:16%
c. Take a time out/Rationalize the situation: 15% Boys-Girls 9%->Total:12%
d. Talk to a friend my own age: 7% Boys-Girls 18%->Total:9%
Those are the main methods.
Duking it out:
A majority of teens (58%) feel it's never appropriate to express anger physically, but a substantial minority (42%) feel that at times, it is OK. However, boys and girls offer starkly different answers to this question. A slight majority of boys (52%) say it's appropriate to express anger physically at times, but only 30% of girls say the same.
It's iterpretation:
a. Boys Withdraw/Girls talk it out:
I think that's consistent with girls being more emotionally articulate than boys generally," Garbarino says. "Girls are more likely to do verbal processing in context of relationships. Boys displace or compartmentalize the anger in an inarticulate, solitary way. It's consistent with the traditional masculine/feminine culture."w, Girls Talk It Out:
b. Duking It Out:
Garbarino and Pollack both suggest that the 30% of girls who say a physical reaction is an appropriate response to anger would have been lower 20 or 30 years ago. Pollack says he is starting to see shifts in gender roles, more among girls than boys, and the shifts aren't necessarily positive.
I think you're missing the link between cussing and dominance. Social dominance is an integral part of human psychology
Cussing is a way to assert that dominance; it is used to signal power.
1. According to APA, that is a dangerous myth. It is unhealthy and unpractical. If you indeed read the APA, than you would have to agree that what you are proposing encourages social, psychological, and physical problems.
There are a lot of situations, especially when dealing with less educated people,
where if you don't cuss, you don't matter
1. Sure. You will have people of that sort come across our path. Once again,
according to the APA, it makes it worst than better. Road rage for example.
Actually I think Christianity in general glosses over issues of social dominance. Turning the other cheek doesn't work when dealing with assholes. In fact, it's a good way to get yourself crucified
1. Lol, however, it really does not solve the problem. The last thing you would want to do is argue with a person who has no self-restraint of their anger. How do you know if the person may have a weapon, etc? Even if the person may not have a weapon, it would seem wise to avoid escalating the situation. I am assuming that you are referring to a total stranger, right? Also, I would like to point out that the verse you were quoting was from the Sermon of the Mount. The literary context and comparing Scripture with Scripture would show you that He was making reference to when the Christian would be persecuted for their faith in Him. Howard G. Hendricks, distinguished Professor and lecturer at Dallas Theological Seminary, made this statement regarding literary and comparison:
"The literary context of any verse is the paragraph of which it is a part, the section of which that paragraph is a part, and the book of which that section is a part. And, given the unity of Scripture, the ultimate context of any book is the entire Bible (Hendricks, Howard and William, "The Living Book", p.226)
"In comparison we compare Scripture with Scripture. And at that offers a great safety net, because the greatest interpreter of Scripture is Scripture itself.
(Hendricks, Howard and William, "The Living Book", p.230)
What you just did was violating hermeneutics. Here is the Bible verse you quoted and read the whole thing rather than just picking one verse without even reading the whole chapter and compare it with other Scripture and the Bible as a whole:
Luke 6:17-36/Matthew 5:1-48 Read the whole chapters and compare.
Both Gospels are dealing with the Sermon of the Mount:
Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven Matthew 5:10
"Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me Matthew 5:11
Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you Matt. 5:12
*But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you Matt. 5:44
By the way, I really do not see how Christianity is any close to being unhealthy or unpractical as far as dealing with anger or such situations. It seem that the evidence that I have provided tells me otherwise.
They do not say that. They say that expressing every angry thought that comes into your head is a bad idea. They say that becoming angry too often is a sign of psychological imbalance. But they make no claims about when cussing or violence is appropriate. They don't really touch on the issue of social dominance. They do however recommend expressing anger to a certain degree and being assertive -- and cussing, under appropriate circumstances, is certainly one way of doing that.
Sometimes you can reason with people, other times they won't listen no matter what. Most people fall between those two extremes. Sometimes you get along fine, other times... not so much. Sometimes, if you start cussing the other person will recognize they're making you angry and will stop pushing so hard. Cussing is an easy way to show that you're angry enough to fight for something. Cussing is just another tool for navigating the brutality inherent to the human condition. Like all tools, it's easy to misuse; but as long as you're capable of using it responsibly, why refuse one of the tools available to you?
They do not say that. They say that expressing every angry thought that comes into your head is a bad idea
Right
They say that becoming angry too often is a sign of psychological imbalance
Right
But they make no claims about when cussing or violence is appropriate
1. Because the word "cuss" is not there does not suggest that they are recommending it.
"Expressing your angry feelings in an assertive—not aggressive—manner is the healthiest way to express anger. To do this, you have to learn how to make clear what your needs are, and how to get them met, without hurting others. Being assertive doesn't mean being pushy or demanding; it means being respectful of yourself and others"
I submit that the principle would be to avoid any certain words that have great power because it solicit emotion. People will feel that power behind that word. In turn, react with more energized words and escalates? How do you know for a certain that stranger would not react violently? If it is someone you know well, than I can understand. But, if it is someone you have no idea who it is...how do you know? By the way, I am not saying you should not cuss. My question is, how do you know that individual (stranger) will not react violently?
They don't really touch on the issue of social dominance. They do however recommend expressing anger to a certain degree and being assertive -- and cussing, under appropriate circumstances, is certainly one way of doing that
2. We both can agree that the word cussing is not there right? It seem that the principle suggests avoiding as much as possible what can escalate into something bigger and even add fuel to it. I mean, because one person may just exchange words with you does not suggest that the next person would do likewise. "Being assertive doesn't mean being pushy or demanding; it means being respectful of yourself and others" How do you know that cussing is not disrespectful to them? I do not think that a person would take it lightly. This is NOT to suggest that you allow people to talk to you or treat you in any manner they feel like it. I hope you understand that is NOT the message I am conveying.
Sometimes you can reason with people, other times they won't listen no matter what
1. Sure, I understand and follow you on that point.
Most people fall between those two extremes. Sometimes you get along fine, other times... not so much. Sometimes, if you start cussing the other person will recognize they're making you angry and will stop pushing so hard
1. Okay, as you know, I mentioned that I am not saying that you should not cuss. I follow you on the point of being firm and people feeling it behind your words. By the way, I should have probably made it more clear that the questions you made concerning how the matter would be handled, you understand it is within the context of two Christians, right? Since you did asked within that context. I would also use the same principles even if the person is not a Christian. That is as far as one on one and having witness if need be. But, yeah, you can't really reason with someone who has an anger issue or just will not plain listen.
"Cussing is an easy way to show that you're angry enough to fight for something. Cussing is just another tool for navigating the brutality inherent to the human condition. Like all tools, it's easy to misuse; but as long as you're capable of using it responsibly, why refuse one of the tools available to you?"
1. Okay, I follow. Your basically not advocating violence, but you're not saying to allow people to just do say and do whatever they feel like with you. I would not allow people to say or treat me anyway either. The part I disagree is the use of cussing because of its very nature according to the Bible.
Nay, God help those who believe that God gives a shit about four letter words! My God cares not about the words I use, but rather how I choose to use words. Do you think God wants us to bare false witness without using foul language?
Yes it is wrong to cuss for kids they could get into trouble at school. Also if you are a follower of Christ you should not be swearing it says in Ephesian 4:29 on why not to swear.
