It hurts my feelings to know that i cannot be accepted with this debate topics. It is like i can't be myself.

I, personally, don't believe in any kind of censorship, especially in debate topics. The more edgy, the better. It can get people to expose their true, core beliefs.

some have problems because of the whole school aid thing, and if the moderators are truly concerned about this, they will hopefully do something about it that doesn't involved deletion, censorship or banhammering. As atypican brought up, a taboo group could work, but i don't agree with 18+. Anyone should be able to debate taboo subjects. I believe it should be a section where you place taboo subjects and they will not show up in the feed (you'd have to go there yourself, which would suck for me because I don't browse debates by topic).

I don't agree with the 18+ idea, I think that's the start of a slippery slope towards total censorship and I don't think that debates about any topic are "perverted", that is unless they are glorifying acts that cause unwanted harm onto others.

Any topic is open to be debated, each will attract different flavors of opinion.

Liking rape does not straight away make someone a pervert either, the rape fantasy is a fairly common sadomasochistic fetish.

Liking sex on the other hand is perfectly natural.

I'd even argue that the term pervert is outdated, what some find perverted is innocent really, two or more consenting adults should be allowed to do whatever they want to each other without the consent of the "Moral Majority".

Life is too short to not enjoy yourself and if no person or no animal is getting hurt or exploited then discuss away.

No... People create all kinds of debates. But, how you present and what you think of it and how well you describe your opinion is what makes a difference. If I were to say that Rape is correct, I'm questionable to every victim who knows how wrong it is. Who knows how it has turned out to be. Your not doing anything wrong when you put up an opinion. But, how you support it, the reasons why you think so... How is it relevant, did you think of those victims or the accused? A million would disagree with one wrong notion. And hence the right way must be adopted.

Consensual rape is okay, fun actually. (yeah it exists) That is as long as it is between adults... of course though you're not talking about adults or fetish or imagination.

As a society we've decided on set rules and one of the most basic is to not rape people. So according to our rules it's wrong...

If you ignore the accepted standards of society there is an arguement for: forcing one to do something is not wrong if it A. it does not hurt them. B. is somehow helpful to them.

Example: A dog is caught in a bear trap and you go to free it, but it keeps trying to bite you. Freeing it hurts therefore it does not want you to do it (the action of releasing the trap can hurt more than the trap) but you know that is what is best for the dog.

However, there's no recorded instance of forcing sex on someone who does not want it ever helping them in any way whatsoever, and there are plenty of examples (pretty much all in fact) of it making their life worse.

So no, don't rape people.

And I've told you this before but you need to see a psychiatrist. You are damaged and showing sociopathic tendencies in you thought process along with this unusual line of thought you continually push.

We know very well, everyone knows, and there is documented scientific evidence that adults having sex with kids causes perminant damage to the kid. Yet you keep ignoring that only thinking of what you project on imaginary situations.

Now, I've noticed you like to argue from a point of view, ie you say "in the mind of the rapist it is not wrong"

however we're not talking about what is in 1 persons mind, we are talking about 2 people, and as such both need to be taken into consideration.

It's so simply but I'm amazed at how dense you tend to be it seems, when it comes to the other point of view.

If from one point of view it is wrong, than it is wrong. It is wrong from one of the points of view, therefore it is wrong.

It's like 1+1=2. I can't put it any simpler.

If you have something to say then say it. You have something to ask then ask the question. Don't care what other people think. When they speak against you, take some evidence and destroy them with it!

"WARNING"

The more it irks people the better the debate? Without a kick to the side of the head - some people would never think sideways.

I too am sick of religious debates also, I like philosophy.

Having uncomfortable images from a poster question - perhaps a warning in the title question such as 'adult' - or if talking about violence - 'trigger warning' - that way those sensitive won't even click on it.

'trigger warning' is used on PTSD forums so that a person doesn't go into a funk for the rest of the day. One trigger is the little girl with the duct tape and the lying murderous mother.

Sometimes I have to turn of the TV or I get upset with the news. This happens a lot.

People's answers should have any warning if most likely to strongly upset the majority of the people.

No.. but please don't create debates in caps like this. It makes you look trollish.

as far as creating a perverted debate goes, there is absolutely nothing wrong with it, your certainly not getting in the way of other peoples rights so who's to say you cant make a perverted debate?