Debate Stats:

Debate Score:6
Arguments:4
Total Votes:8
Ends:Never
More Stats
Graph Updates Live
install flash for graphs
Yes No

Sort By Tags:

All Tags
Pro-execution (3)

Debate Creator:

Selric(61) pic

Are you trying to figure out how this debate works? Show Quick Tips
 

Is there a heinous enough non-homicide crime to warrant execution?

Child Rape: Enough for Execution?

Yes
Side Score:
5
VS.
No
Side Score:
1
– MyPic borme(524) Vote Up Vote Down
2
points 

While I believe the death penalty should only be used in very narrow circumstances, raping a child is one of the most heinous and egregious acts possible and I think that it should constitute a death sentence.

I agree with the disappointment in this verdict that Justice Samuel Alito felt. Alito who wrote in his dissenting opinion that this decision by the court means that the death penalty would not apply “no matter how young the child, no matter how many times the child is raped, no matter how many children the perpetrator rapes, no matter how sadistic the crime, no matter how much physical or psychological trauma is inflicted, and no matter how heinous the perpetrator’s prior criminal record may be.”

This is very disturbing that people that commit such a terrible and serious crime will not face the ultimate consequence.

Posted 104 days ago | Tagged As: Pro-execution
– MyPic Tamisan(428) Vote Up Vote Down
1
point  

It's a sad, terrible thing that our court system is so broken and makes so many mistakes, but that court is only human and typically sane. The individuals who are put on death row are nearly always incurably insane--might I even say, "evil"?

I generally believe in the good of all people--or at least the potential. But there are some out there who are truly, honestly, incurably, and criminally insane. These criminals do not have the tools or abilities to function in the world we live in. They prey upon other humans in manners that a typical jury (you and me) cannot fathom. They see themselves as justified and are unrepentant.

Having an incurably mad predator in prison for life does nothing but waste our society's resources. The GOAL of the prison system should be to rehabilitate criminals--not punish them. Their punishment should be serving humanity. But there is no humanity in the criminally insane. They have no place in this world.

Posted 104 days ago | Tagged As: Pro-execution
– MyPic Pothead(32) Favored Vote Up Vote Down
0
points 

Not according to the US Supreme Court!

Posted 104 days ago
Supporting Evidence: The Court has decided 5-4. (www.suntimes.com)
– MyPic jal1337(30) Vote Up Vote Down
1
point  

I don't believe in the death penalty at all, even in the case of homicide. The 8th amendment says " Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." I consider death to be a cruel punishment. I do think we should punish criminals for what they do, but not with death.

Death is considered to be the ultimate punishment for a crime. I can somewhat understand the argument that murderers deserve death because they actually took someone's life, but how can you justify murder on someone who hasn't even committed murder themselves.

The United States is supposed to be a civilized country and

above the use of horrible act of torture. Shouldn't we also be above the use of murder as a punishment? How are we any better then they are if we murder them, especially when they didn't even murder anyone?

Posted 101 days ago


About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Newsletter Archive
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Sitemap
Sharing Tools
Send Beta Invites
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Legal Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Creative Commons

©2008 CreateDebate, LLC All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.