CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
Second, Identitarianism is white nationalism. White Nationalists play the same game as SJW’s, claiming they are victims who need to assert the power of their group over others for the sake of “justice”. They are two sides of the same racist, collectivist coin.
I long ago put Excon on my ban list for this very reason. He constantly makes deceptive statements toward the Right. I refuse to waste my time with deceptive people. You will never get him to admit his deception.
The guys who truly belong on a perma-ban list cannot be banned. They have no permanent account.
Excon may not admit to the inaccuracy of his statement, but I don’t think it’s intended as deception. He believes what he is saying. He didn’t post a video because it proved his own statement false. He posted it because he believed it validated his statement. In the end, rather than being convinced, he may just think “yeah but..”. That’s not deception, that’s bias.
This is my appeal on behalf of Excon for you to remove him from your perma-ban list. If he is indeed proved wrong, that only bolsters your position. If he is not, then it’s an opportunity to say something other than “yeah but”.
The guys who truly belong on a perma-ban list cannot be banned. They have no permanent account.
You have a permanent account and you truly belong on the permaban list, so how about we start with you?
Your activity on this website consists of changing your argument every time somebody disproves it, writing 10,000 word essays of self-glorifying narcissistic rubbish and generally acting like a smarmy, disingenuous bully.
I have given Excon many chances to get off my ban list as he has asked me to do so.
I told him there is one simple thing he can do to show me he is not purposely being deceptive.
I said he can admit that when he votes for these Democrats who support No Restriction abortions, that he is culpable and accountable for keeping these extreme abortions legal.
I have given him the sites clearly explaining the Democrat Party's support for late term abortions of any viable baby for any reason. I have shown him how they refuse to allow the GOP to get the 60 votes they need to pass a 20 week abortion limit (with extreme case exceptions). Almost ever Democrats votes against the compromise abortion bill, and almost every Republican votes for the bill.
This is when he goes silent because he refuses to admit what he knows to be true. That is pure deception.
The door is always open for him to become honest and admit his support for these extreme abortions by helping elect those who will keep the depravity legal.
I have given Excon many chances to get off my ban list as he has asked me to do so.
Hello From:
The problem we have is that you can't FUCKING read.. I've NEVER, EVER asked you to take me off your ban list.. That would be NEVER.. I have CRITICIZED you for NOT wanting to hear the truth.. But, that is NOT even close to asking anything of you...
You have complained about being banned by me, many times. Newsflash, this is no different then asking to be unbanned! Stop talking about it if you do not care.
What a shock, still no admittance to what you support with your vote. I will take that as admitting your culpability to late term abortions of viable babies.
But of course you lack the character to admit it. Hence the ban!
I agree with you that he is not like the childish fools who spend all their time on this site attacking and insulting debaters with Conservative ideals.
But there can never be an intelligent debate with people who deliberately refuse to admit the truth of what they support. Without honesty there is no debate.
Look at that. In your own link there is neither an escalator nor a generalized statement against Mexicans as a people. Like I said, that didn’t happen. Thanks for the supporting evidence.
Look at that. In your own link there is neither an escalator nor a generalized statement against Mexicans as a people.
LOL. Thanks for the green light buddy.
They are liars, murderers and land thieves who kill Palestinians for sport. It is impossible to have a conversation with any one of them which doesn't involve them either lying to you or trying to convince you to give them all your money.
I dunno WHO you think "they" are except your average everyday Mexican.
You have make quality a leap to assume that he means the people he specifically said they are not sending. He said they are sending bad people, not their best, though maybe some good people. He in no way shape or form said the Mexicans are all X. Someone told you to believe that, now you see things not supported by your eyes. Are they lying?
You say he didn't use the word all.. I say he didn't use the word some.
When he says “some I assume are good people” what do you hear?
When he says that Mexico is “not sending their best”, do you assume he means their best sex traffickers and murderers? Or does he mean Mexicans that are highly skilled, non-criminals? If it’s the latter, then he cannot mean that being Mexican means being a criminal.
When he says that Mexico is “not sending their best”, do you assume he means their best sex traffickers and murderers? Or does he mean Mexicans that are highly skilled, non-criminals?
I hear that SOME are good people, therefore the rest must be RAPISTS..
It'd be a good idea to find out either way, wouldn't it Con...
I'll simplify it Con. If you were in a tribe wandering around on your territory hundreds or thousands of years ago, and you saw someone obviously not in your tribe, you would have a position based on natural survival instincts to protect your tribe. You wouldn't just let them head for your people without a serious inquiry and your weapon drawn just in case. It's the identical, same logic...
But...normal human instincts have been drowned out of libs by the self righteous groupthink police zealots in charge of the hive.
He actually said ......Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best,” he said in the same speech. “They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”
Since the Left has a new alphabet starting with LBGTQ... they had to come up with an entirely new way of identifying people.
America was once considered the land of the free, home of the brave, but this was far too vague for the Democrat Party. It included everyone! How was this going to garner the Special interest votes for Democrats?
So decades ago, the Democrat Party sat down behind closed doors, and hatched their new master plan to win elections... IDENTITY POLITICS!
The Left witnessed how their anti Christian Progressive Socialistic agendas were creating many more broken families, with the inevitable increase in Government dependents.
They had a decision to make... standing strong with a value system so important to securing intact families, or embracing this amoral sub culture.
We all know what they chose. They decided to pit one American against the next and segregate Americans into Special interest groups. Their goal was to make these groups of people believe they were hated by the Republican Party.
Since racial tensions were running high at the time, the Black vote was considered first and foremost in their new master plan of Identity politics. Hence, African Americans became their number one group on the list of identity politics.
This was followed by the Feminist movement. Women became the Left's next Special interest identity. This movement ushered in one of the most divisive issues in our nation's history... ABORTION!
The Democrat Party of course embraced the inhumanity of abortion because this was a political powder keg. The thoughts of millions of dead babies was of little consequence to them. They were salivating over the potential for millions of votes.
This was followed by their new alphabet... LBGTQ........
This was like a goldmine of potential new votes for Democrats... Lesbians, Bisexuals, Gays, Transgender, etc., etc., the possibilities endless.
At this point I'm not sure if the Left has found a new low, including Pedophiles into this new alphabet. I know they are deeply involved with Pedophile rights.
Since then, identity politics has moved on to Muslims, illegal immigrants, Transgender men playing in women's sports, etc.
The list goes on and on.
I don't know about you, but I will vote for the Politician who see's me as an American!
A politician who will treat me as important as any other American in this nation.
He will not punish me for being a hard working successful American. He will treat me with the same respect he gives every other American, not seeing me as votes for his opponents, not calling me a Conservative racist and Nazi, to sway votes.
Identity politics goes against everything America once stood for.
Only an idiot thinks that making abortion illegal will stop abortion. The only thing you're doing is removing a means for safe, medically qualified doctor's to preform the procedure. But then, you think all Democrats want no-restriction abortions, which holds just as much truth as Republicans wanting women chained up being forced to give birth.
Only an idiot thinks that making convenience abortions illegal would not save many many lives!
We all know we will never stop all illegal abortions, no more then we will ever stop all women who throw their babies into dumpsters. No more then we will ever stop all murders with laws.
A civilized nation makes laws protecting the innocent, and to protect as many lives as possible.
Do you want to make dumpster killing legal as well?
Do you ever even read your words and see how ludicrous they sound? How many lives saved would make a difference to people like you?
To deny your culpability with late term abortions of viable babies, when voting for those who tell you they will keep it legal, is beyond deceptive. It's moronic!
Hmm gee.......allowing women the right under certain circumstances to get a safe, clean abortion with a qualified doctor......or taking away that right and encouraging botched abortions, back ally abortions with unqualified "doctors", women drinking/smoking in excess to try to abort, dumpster babies.....boy that's a toughie. You're going to be causing more death and dismemberment than you think. It's always fun to watch your hypocrisy in action. Protect lives....force women to mutilate themselves in desperation, even if it means botched abortions and/or the death of both. Huzzah.
Abortion available up to the first trimester. After that, unless the woman's (or child's) life is in danger she should be encouraged to deliver the baby and put it up for adoption. If there is an instance of depression to the point that she is threatening either her life or the unborn child's, and doctor's are seriously concerned that she may try to self-harm, it may be necessary to remove the baby however hopefully it'll be far enough along that they can keep it alive through artificial means (incubator) until it can support itself without the use of technology and placed for adoption.
This is not an end all solution to all circumstances and I'd love to hear other idea's, but making abortion completely illegal is short-sighted at best.
After that, unless the woman's (or child's) life is in danger she should be encouraged to deliver the baby and put it up for adoption.
Why not allow abortion after the first trimester?
This is not an end all solution to all circumstances and I'd love to hear other idea's
I’m sorry, but I don’t see what the first trimester limit resolves. Any concerns you had about unsafe abortions would still persist for those after the first trimester. That could be accounted for by your mental health addendum, wherein a willing doctor can always say “I’m sorry ma’am but your already 4 month along. However, if it makes you wanna kill yourself, we can get that mass of cells out of you first thing in the morning.” This leaves complete room for the kind of abortions you seek to limit.
I suppose I already asked, but Why exactly do you want to limit abortions?
You might as well be talking to a wall. She will never admit what she supports with her vote.
You tried your best to get her to explain why some babies deserve the right to life, while others according to her do not.
Pro abortion people never get down to those details because we both know where it leads. It leads to premeditated support for killing living human beings. These are the people preaching tolerance, inclusivity and compassion to those on the Right.
Yes, you & I both know that when these barbaric hypocrites include mental health reasons for abortions, (which includes depression) that any abortion of viable babies is allowed. It's the Left's pathetic excuse to try and claim they do not support aborting all babies for any reason.
If a woman wants an abortion, she will tell the doctor she is suicidal from the pregnancy. VOILA.... KILL THE BABY!
We all know we will never stop all illegal abortion
Hello From:
Couple things.
First, we STOPPED illegal abortion when we made abortion legal. That is unarguably true. In order to KEEP it stopped, we need to KEEP it legal..
In my view, government needs to regulate what people DO in the normal course of their lives. It shouldn't try to STOP people from doing what they do.. Here's an example.. People DO drugs.. That's just so.. They always HAVE, and they always WILL.. We TRIED to tell them NOT to do drugs by locking them up.. It didn't work.. It'll NEVER work..
If a woman wants to end her pregnancy, she'll see a doctor, or she'll poke a coat hanger all up inside her..
Here's an example.. People DO drugs.. That's just so.. They always HAVE, and they always WILL.. We TRIED to tell them NOT to do drugs by locking them up.. It didn't work.. It'll NEVER work..
So pretty much my why making guns illegal won't work argument. You'll just have more illegal, unregistered guns.
Interesting that your "let everyone live their lives" argument includes a gun grab in violation of the Second Amendment.
