CreateDebate


Debate Info

3
2
Impostor It's him
Debate Score:5
Arguments:7
Total Votes:6
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Impostor (3)
 
 It's him (2)

Debate Creator

JakeJ(3255) pic



James Holmes: Impostor in court?

Impostor

Side Score: 3
VS.

It's him

Side Score: 2
1 point

Sorry I could figure out how to put a picture in the stupid thing here's a link

http://twitchy.com/2012/07/27/conspiracy-theorists-think-the-real-james-holmes-did-not-appear-in-court/

Side: Impostor
1 point

I don't really think so, but there's a movie by Uwe Boll called Rampage that actually has something like that.

Rampage is probably Uwe Boll's best film (because most of his movies are God-awful.) The movie is about a mass murderer and what he does to get away with it.

So I don't believe this guy to be an impostor or anything, but it's not completely out of the question.

Side: Impostor
1 point

Why would they place a false person in place of the actual criminal. It logically makes no sense.

Side: It's him
carolineee(4) Disputed
1 point

The government does all sorts of crap to 1. show people just what they can do 2. to get things out of people & use them to eff up our country . Our government is EFFED up .

Side: Impostor
1 point

Conspiracy theorists just being conspiracy theorists.

Redhead James has tilted head and a stretched face expression, also not smiling.

Most of that can account for the seemingly unidentical features. The nose can be explained three ways...

1) Dark haired James is obviously from an older time period, the length in hair already shows that. His structure may have simply grown too.

2) Nose job. (Unlikely, but still a possibility).

3) His surprised expression stretches the face, so if not on his own, then in combination with possibility #1 or #2 his nose looks much different rather than a little different.

Since the picture on the right is tilted, the combination picture on the left is probably an altered picture since both heads line up. So what else may they have altered?

And finally, you put two pictures of yourself from at least a years difference and tell me both halves will line up perfectly.

Side: It's him
JakeJ(3255) Clarified
1 point

You raise some great points.

I just don't agree with the first sentence of your argument. I hope you don't just think a theory is bogus just because it's a "conspiracy theory". That would be supremely closed minded.

Side: Impostor
riahlize(1573) Clarified
1 point

No, I don't presume it's bogus because it is a conspiracy theory. However conspiracy theorists, implied by definition, automatically jump to treacherous and/or surreptitious theories. It's very sectarian.

So while I do not assume it's bogus, I do find more doubt in them and require much more evidence than what they mostly have to offer as "evidence".

Side: Impostor