Marriage is the union of a man and a woman. Not a woman and a woman!

There has not been a description made on the loss of United States Constitutional Right. This was criminal trial held in a Civil Court of law without representation. Both crimes take place at the same time so the idea is double jeopardy would create an immunity.

It is not a point of what should be allowed. Sadly it is the point of what was legal. There is no legal reason a Federal, State, or local Court must witness a union between two couples of the same gender, THEY TAKE PLACE EVERY DAY WITH NO ISSUE LEGALLY. or interfere with private likelihood. No reason for the Courts to instruct the public must see, must say. What you are saying is that Gay and Lesbian couples should have rights that extend beyond or exceed their limits placed on personal choice, gender, and United States Constitution.

Because of the nature of the first crime that has taken place. There is a Fraud by describing the only crime as discrimination. The extent of the Civil War which has been taking place globally. The lack of Constitutional representation made by these groups in the United States. The argument is no longer just about if they can be married legally as a couple. It is how they are not Binivir. Civil Union, or UnosMulier by common law. To receive judicial Constitutional separation. In a separation process to insure liberty.

Unlike abortion were the felony crime is confessed by self-incrimination. The attack made on United States Constitution is not limited to the suggested types of people. Gay and Lesbian couples have been also subject to accusation that can be placed against people who may not been granted representation by law used to govern them. It may not be directly related to persona choice involving sex. Make no mistake they had Constitutional Right all along.

Basic principle is all male and female couple are publicly witnessed by their ability to procreate and conceive citizens of a Nation. Again here we are testing the boundary of Civil War, and voter fraud as well as other issues.

This is a State of the Union address made on the United States Constitution.

I dont know if this exist in the US but in France there was already a type of union for gays (its called 'pacs'), that was very beneficial to them as the law gives them financial advantages, it is easier to divorce and other thing

The perception of mariage is diiferent between the US and France, in the US it only is a contract (wich is why it justifies divorce, bc a contract cannot be eternally viable) while in France it is at the same time a contract and an "institution" meaning its a "historical" and religious ceremony (and christianity condems homosexuality)

I think it was more of a kick in the teeth of the right religious wing more than anything else (even homosexuals milit against marriage for several reasons; furthurmore look at the numbers of homosexual marriages, they are insanely low)

I realise this doesnt really answer the question, just sharing thoughts :)

Do you want men having 30 wives? When you go down this ludicrous equal right's for marriage slippery slope, every group of people can claim they want equal rights also. They will want to have 30 wives, marry consenting teens, marry animals, etc. etc.