Let's all debate like from within. Nice, neat paragraphs that mean nothing.
|
No! 52 paragraphs that completely ignore the argument presented, mock the original person for being wrong/dishonest/liberal/evil, changing the subject away from what the original topic was about, and repeatedly demonstrably lying and misrepresenting everything around every assertion he makes followed up with dismissive bans when he can't defend his position all "mean something". It's just that what they mean is "from within is an idiot." It's what I've been saying all along, idiocy comes FromWithin.............................. One can't debate FromWithin, it's always gobeldygook followed by a ban. Something like the ex-mayor of NYC after the Twin Towers came down ... Every statement was a noun, a verb and 9/11. With FromWithin it's a noun a verb and abortion ... followed by a ban! You can't really debate that. 2
points
One can't debate FromWithin, it's always gobeldygook followed by a ban. Something like the ex-mayor of NYC after the Twin Towers came down ... Every statement was a noun, a verb and 9/11. With FromWithin it's a noun a verb and abortion ... followed by a ban! You can't really debate that. He has an incredibly diseased mind. I disagree with the description of his paragraphs as "nice, neat". But you're right they mean nothing. His arguments do not vary in the slightest and could almost be cut and paste from one debate to the next. They're only differentiated by whatever grammatical error is the new surprise each time. |
