CreateDebate


Debate Info

92
54
Yes No
Debate Score:146
Arguments:92
Total Votes:174
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (51)
 
 No (33)

Debate Creator

TheEccentric(3382) pic



Libprolifer has proven that she is a stupid woman

*Creates a "No Banning" version of another debate

*Bans someone

www.createdebate.com/debate/show/No_banning_didtatorship_versus_democracy

Yes

Side Score: 92
VS.

No

Side Score: 54

She might as well have entitled it the "No banning of LibProlifer exclusively" version. Her alone being banned from a debate is enough reason for her to make a copy of it.

Side: Yes
6 points

But that doesn't really make sense, now does it?

Side: No
3 points

The weird part is that you left a comment and didn't respond to anything else. You were not banned for a while, then just randomly got banned.

Side: Yes

Who knows what goes on in the alien world that is her head.

Side: Yes
2 points

The great thing is that she created the debate because you "silenced" her and never once talked about the actual topic.

Side: Yes
1 point

You banned me first. I will unban you if you unban me. .

Side: Yes
Cuaroc(8829) Disputed
4 points

Not how debating works.

Side: Yes
Sitar(3680) Disputed
1 point

Yesa it is. If he unbans me, I will unban him. If he wants to post on my debates, he needs to unban me. Fair is fair.

Side: No
1 point

She wants to be like the Founding Fathers of America, but is against revolt.

Side: Yes
1 point

Her debate title was fallacious and blatantly broke it on multiple occasions: at least 2

Libprolifer:

I banned him by accident. How do I fix that? .

Me:

You've banned two already! and one of them was one who commented on the fact that you've broken your title... I don't think it was an accident: "There are no accidents" ~ Master Oogway

Overall her ability to maintain a statement of what she said she would do/ implied she would do is clearly false, showing her arrogance/stupidity (as they walk hand in hand)

Side: Yes
1 point

Yeah sorry about that I got bored while creating her.

Side: Yes
6 points

But that doesn't really make sense, now does it?

Side: No
3 points

Stupid or irrelevant or repetitious...none of those are reasons to ban someone.

Side: No
2 points

Their gender is not particularly relevant to their intelligence, for the record. That said their arguments are underdeveloped, repetitious, and non-responsive most of the time.

Side: No
1 point

I wasn't saying she was a stupid because she was a woman. I was just saying that she is stupid and a woman. Likewise I don't think being a man makes you stupid but if she were a male I would be calling her a "stupid man".

Side: Yes
Jace(5222) Clarified
3 points

The observation that Libprolifer is a woman is irrelevant in this context, except as an ingrained associate with stupidity. Seriously, why include it all if not for that sub-consciously indoctrinated association?

Side: Yes
1 point

Thank you. You are awesome. .

Side: No
Jace(5222) Clarified
1 point

I have no idea why you are thanking me... but, you are welcome?

Side: Yes

I'm rather confused as to why gender is relevant here.

Side: No
6 points

But that doesn't really make sense, now does it?

Side: Yes
1 point

Just how TheEccentric talks. He doesn't mean anything by it.

Side: No

Alright. I was unaware of this. I was beginning to assume he had some sort of problem with women.

Side: No
0 points

Fair enough but do you actually think that she is not stupid?

Side: Yes

Does she lack intelligence or common sense?

Side: Yes