First and foremost, seeking asylum is LEGAL.. Do I need to REPEAT that for you?? Needed or not, I'm gonna.. SEEKING ASYLUM IS LEGAL

Cool. So what do we do if the entire nation of China crosses into Alaska and files for asylum at one time? Use common sense and say nah? Or does liberalism trump logic at all costs, feelings over common sense with no barriers or boundries or limits?

Therefore, as law abiding civilized members of the world community, we USED to welcome refugees..

They didn't used to be intentionally orchestrated and organized into giant mobs with the populations of towns.

Now, we STACK UP 1,000's of 'em inside Tijuana, with NOTHING to eat and nowhere to GO, and expect everything to go well..

I expect them to get in line behind the millions trying to do it legally. If you invite yourself to my house, and demand food, that's your problem. I don't owe charity to someone demanding my goods. I owe charity to who I choose. It's my shit.

Secondly, I also expect them to not start attacking border security and robbing the citizens of Tijuana. As the debate title infers, when does the safety and security of Tijuana's citizenry enter the liberal mind? Or is just fuck em because it's not you personally being overrun and mobbed because libs have a political point to make, Tijuana be damned?

For a person who's intimately familiar with the Trail of Tears, I'd think YOU'D have a little empathy. No, huh?

The 5 Civilized Tribes were taken at gunpoint by Democrats and pushed thousands of miles against their will. When you capture someone, you owe them food and protection. They received no mercy. Thousands died of starvation, dehydration, and beatings.

These people chose to come here by their own free will. I doubt any people on the Trail of Tears would see these people as real victims of a heartless U.S. government. They would have traded for this treatment in a heartbeat.

therefore, as law abiding civilized members of the world community

Cool. So, a couple questions.

1)At what number of asylum seekers and border jumpers is the U.S. allowed to say enough is enough, and if there is no number, aren't you an open borders Marxist by default?

2)If there is a number, at what number of asylum seekers and border jumpers is the U.S. allowed to say enough is enough?

3)If there is a number where we can say enough is enough, why can't it be my number, which is zero because Mexico will let them seek asylum there, and we already take in 1,250,000 legal migrants per year?