Meet Mark Robinson a "Black Gun Owner" in America
On Tuesday while speaking during a city council meeting on curtailing gun violence an African-American gun owner in North Carolina blasted government officials who want to restrict gun rights of law-abiding citizens. The city council meeting was held to determine whether the community should cancel an upcoming gun show which is held twice yearly at the Coliseum, a city-owned building.
"When are you all gonna start standing up for the majority? ... I'm the majority! I'm a law-abiding citizen who's never shot anybody," Mark Robinson said. "It seems every time we have one of these shootings, nobody wants to put the blame where it goes, which is at the shooter's feet. You want to put it at my feet! It doesn't make any sense."
“You want to restrict my right to buy a firearm and protect myself from some of the very people you are talking about in here tonight,” Robinson continued. “The law-abiding citizens of this community, of other communities we are the first ones taxed and the last ones considered.”
Oh no how is the Rabid Anti-Gun Left going to handle the African American standing up not only for his Constitutional Right but that of others when it comes to firearms ?
|
https://www.youtube.com/ The man pushed the Little Leftist into a corner when it comes to guns. He spoke the Unspoken Truth when it comes to the Leftist Narrative on Gun Control. It's not about nor has it ever been about disarming the criminals. 3
points
Oh, the humanity of it all! A Black person who is not lock-step with the Democrats; how are liberals going to deal with it? By calling him names like Uncle Tom, sell-out, the house negro and worse. The left's worst nightmare is a minority with their own mind, independent, and coming to their own conclusions about issues of the day that's not aligned with the liberal narrative. We need more Mark Robinsons in this world. Pay Attention will you ! That is if you can ? Goggle on Al Gore's Internet can be friendly to the brain dead as you are!! http://www.bbc.com/news/ You need much more information there you Brain Dead Dummy ???????? 1
point
2
points
The arguement you are having is spurious its from a position of diminishing responsibilities, if you stop me having a gun i'll shoot you because i need it to stop someone shooting me, its circular and a lie you want a gun because it makes you feel powerful and that is a little bit sad and being sad, if not dealt with properly leads to anger and anger leads to frustration with leads to the inability to think straight and feeling a bit weak but your powerful you have a gun and you can prove your power by using that gun. I am not religious in the slightest but i understand the story of Job and 99.9% of people are not Job therefore if their life is ruined they may make stupid decisions and having a gun is a stupid decision but hey what do i know? The Circular Statement you make is very entertaining but none the less very stupid. You have not addressed the fact that Progressives want to disarm the law abiding and will never address the guns which criminals have. Now let a Black Man in America punk you Dummies LMMFAO !!!!!! 1
point
You have not addressed the fact that Progressives want to disarm the law abiding and will never address the guns which criminals have. This just demonstrates a total misunderstanding of the concept of time. In the eyes of the law everybody is law abiding until the point they are convicted of a crime. Hence, by giving "law-abiding" citizens guns you are in fact giving guns to young versions of Jeffrey Dahmer and Ted Bundy. Only an idiot would think that is a good thing to do. Moreover, only an idiot would fail to grasp that laws should not be changed to accommodate the criminals who are breaking them. In common with the rest of the U.K., firearms were, and still are banned in Northern Ireland. Yet withal guns and explosives were shipped into this neck of the woods by the 1000s and used to slaughter some 3500 people. In most parts of the world anyone who wants to illegally obtain a gun can do so without major difficulty. Well gun laws don't work to the extent people are claiming but some regulation must be in place as a free for all could see a return to a wild west culture. The argument that it is people and not guns which kill people only adds to the call for stricter and more extensive psychological testing of all existing firearm licence holders and even stricter profiling of all new permit applicants. 0
points
In 2015, 10,265 people died in alcohol-impaired driving crashes, accounting for nearly one-third (29%) of all traffic-related deaths in the United States. So you tell me with each child dying from a drunk driver, why the Left is not all over the media pretending to be outraged over these innocent children's deaths? Do you have any idea how many more children are killed by drunk drivers than by guns in schools? Where is the outrage and demand for alcohol regulations and back ground checks in public bars, nightclubs, etc. If the real reasons for more gun control legislation is to save lives, why won't the Left propose laws mandating back ground checks in public places that sell alcohol to possible repeat DWI offenders? I don't want this, but if your goal is to save lives with all your anti Gun rhetoric, you should be over joyed to save many thousands more lives by having background checks on people before buying alcohol in public places. Do you have any idea how many times repeat DWI drivers continue to drink and drive? Approximately 40% of drunk drivers are repeat offenders! They drive even when their licenses are revoked! The only way to prevent this is to do a background check before they buy that weapon of death.....ALCOHOL! Wait, what you say? You say you don't want to be inconvenienced by background checks when buying alcohol? You say you are a law abiding citizen who would never drink and drive? You say you don't want to pay more for alcohol to pay for those background checks for past DWI drivers? I THOUGHT YOUR GOAL WAS TO SAVE LIVES? You expect law abiding citizens to pay more and put up with all the inconvenience from your anti gun legislation, but when it comes to your alcohol...... HANDS OFF? A drunk driver behind the wheels of a car happens millions of times more often than some lunatic with a gun! The odds of you or your loved one being killed by a drunk driver is far higher than the odds of being shot at a concert or Church. You are hypocrites and total jokes. You prove you could not care less about saving lives. You final goal is to take our guns. You always spew your ludicrous reasoning why only guns should be singled out to save lives. A police state is just fine as long as it only controls one particular weapon of death..... the gun. You say we already have alcohol restrictions? Yes, and we already have gun restrictions. You can't buy a gun under age, the same as alcohol. We can't shoot people, you can't hunt near public places and you can not drink and drive. BUT PEOPLE STILL DO IT! IT'S NOT THE WEAPON OF CHOICE, BUT THE PERSON BEHIND THAT WEAPON. Use the brain God gave you and start addressing why people grow up to be criminals, or become irresponsible drinkers who have no problem drinking and driving. Start addressing the core problem instead of their weapon of choice. |
