Methodically explaining why Communism and Marx are wrong.
4
points
As A I progresses and robots are able to perform most, then eventually all the functions presently performed by the workers the innovative and industrious entrepreneurs will be able to retain 100% ( less tax) of the profits from their imaginative business ventures while the whinging sheepeople will have to make do with existing on their meagre benefit handouts. The whingers currently have, and will continue to have the same opportunities to become captains of industry and amass personal fortunes whilst contributing positively to the welfare of their respective countries. Of course that won't happen. As the robots work tirelessly making the goods the world wants and needs it will still be the same clever, visionary industrial and commercial magnates whose congenital business acumen will ensure that it is they and not the brain dead whingers, who will continue to enjoy sipping their chilled Krug champagne on board their multi-million dollar yachts as they bob gently up and down in the azure blue sea of the Monte-Carlo Harbour. The go getters will be doing what clever, ambitious and capable people do, GETING RICH The whingers will be telling their wives;- '' going down pub for pint and pie and to WHINGE about all these clever pigs making more money than the rest of us, bloody robots never go on strike''. A business does what it perceives to be most profitable, losing potential customers due to them not having the capital needed in order to be customers as they're unemployed and have no source of income isn't profitable, therefore if automation really led to mass unemployment there wouldn't be any automation. Even if automation did lead to mass unemployment, the means by which businesses were established in the first place won't disappear, the only thing a business relies on are people that are willing to trade their work in return for a wage and buy its produce, unemployed people fit both categories and therefore new businesses will be established. Your world is rapidly disappearing and will soon be gone with the wind. The standard pint and pie eating fools will be left scratching their heads wondering what ever happened to their world. On the other side of the fence there will be the clever tycoons who will have embraced the new A I technology and will have the foresight and flexibility to adjust and adapt their industrial output and financial services to meet the demand in the ever evolving civilian and governmental market sectors. There are currently millions, nay, worldwide, 10s of millions of unemployed who use their handouts to purchase automobiles, televisions along with a range of other luxury goods all of which are produced by the shrewd, hard working, risk taking entrepreneurial giants. As the might of the robots marches relentlessly on these figures will increase dramatically. The brain dead sheepeople will be doled out just sufficient dosh to buy grub and to purchase the goods being manufactured by the corporations. The days of the whinging masses* holding their employers to ransom are coming to an end as we see motor vehicles being produced by armies of robots and crewless trains transporting 1000s of people around airport terminals. There are none so blind than those who do not want to see, but as sure as day follows night, so the era of job intensive industries are fading. Mankind has seen the Stone age, the Bronze age, the Iron age, the Nuclear age, and now we're entering the Robot age. ''Come janitors and joiners, You must heed the call, Don't stand in the doorway don't block up the hall, For he who gets hurt will be he who has stalled, There's robot outside and it's raging, It will soon shake your windows And rattle your walls For the robots are going to kick your balls''. Businesses may, up to a point influence the buying habits of the public, but in the main they will cater for the ever changing market trends. Your business must EVOLVE or you will go under. You must have what people want and can afford as opposed to what you think they want and should be able to afford. This business strategy has been the cornerstone of most successful enterprises. 1
point
I have to agree with you. Communism is a foolish ideology even for the far left. Although I do think that there should be a strong central government in case the state governments fail somehow, I do not believe it should take over the entire country with its extreme authoritarianism. In a way, communism is more unfair than capitalism, because communism was a system created to serve a system, not it's people. I would appreciate it if you Orwellian conservatard fuckwits would stop flipping reality on it's head. Thanks, that'd be great. What is morally sound or logically practical about giving 90% of the earnings generated by a company to a few people at the top while giving crumbs to those who did all the work? Would it not be more fair to distribute 90% of the earnings evenly among the workers and give the 10 percent to the small handful of people who sat on their buttocks touching themselves while others made their money for them? |