CreateDebate


Debate Info

5
5
Was Was times two
Debate Score:10
Arguments:8
Total Votes:11
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Was (4)
 
 Was times two (4)

Debate Creator

brontoraptor(28599) pic



Nazism was the uniting of the far right and far left into one ideology

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal social justice, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge.
-Adolf Hitler

"Why We Are Anti-Semites," August 15, 1920 speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus. Translated from Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 16. Jahrg., 4. H. (Oct., 1968), pp. 390-420. Edited by Carolyn Yeager. 

Since we are socialists, we must necessarily also be antisemites because we want to fight against the very opposite: materialism and mammonism… How can you not be an antisemite, being a socialist!"
-Adolf Hitler

"Why We Are Anti-Semites," August 15, 1920 speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus. Translated from Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 16. Jahrg., 4. H. (Oct., 1968), pp. 390-420. Edited by Carolyn Yeager.

"In our movement the two extremes come together: the Communists from the Left and the officers and students from the Right. These two have always been the most active elements."
-Adolf Hitler

As quoted in Der Fuehrer Hitler’s Rise to Power, Konrad Heiden, Boston, MA, Beacon Press, 1969, p. 147, first published 1944. Hitler’s quote also cited in Totalitarianism: Part Three of The Origins of Totalitarianism, Hannah Arendt, A Harvest Book, 1985, footnote, p. 7


**Adolf Hitler and other proponents denied the view that Nazism was either left-wing or right-wing, instead they officially portrayed Nazism as a syncretic movement.**

**In Mein Kampf, Hitler directly attacked both left-wing and right-wing politics in Germany, saying:**

"Today our left-wing politicians in particular are constantly insisting that their craven-hearted and obsequious foreign policy necessarily results from the disarmament of Germany, whereas the truth is that this is the policy of traitors ... But the politicians of the Right deserve exactly the same reproach. It was through their miserable cowardice that those ruffians of Jews who came into power in 1918 were able to rob the nation of its arms."

"When asked whether he supported the "bourgeois right-wing", Hitler claimed that Nazism was not exclusively for any class and he also indicated that it favoured neither the left nor the right, but preserved "pure" elements from both "camps" by stating: "From the camp of bourgeois tradition, it takes national resolve, and from the materialism of the Marxist dogma, living, creative Socialism."

**The radical Nazi Joseph Goebbels hated capitalism, viewing it as having Jews at its core.**

Was

Side Score: 5
VS.

Was times two

Side Score: 5
daver(1771)
1 point

Yeah Hitler was f*#:%d up. What's your point.

Side: Was
Support Dispute Clarify
excon(18261)
2 points

Hello bront:

Look.. If I was a rightwinger, and Hitler was a rightwinger, and TRUMP is a rightwinger, I'd try my damndest to point to the libs too.

Your history is as fucked up as your politics.

Have a nice day..

excon

Side: Was times two
Support Dispute Clarify
↑ Hide Replies
brontoraptor(28599) Disputed Banned
1 point

Oh? So you've intentionally ignored every word of the link.

And? You refuse to tell us how it is that white supremacists in America ran the left for at least half a century, even voting for KKK members in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, and demonstrably voted for Robert Byrd from 1953 to 2010.

You also refuse to address that the woman the left wanted in power called Robert Byrd her mentor.

It's almost like magic Con.

You fought the Commies but side with Commies. Our party is "racist", yet you were never a Republican even before the so called "switch" that history doesn't remember, ya know, back when the kkk ran the Democratic Party overtly.

I guess that tells us all we need to know now doesn't it Con?

Side: Was
Support Dispute Clarify
↑ Hide Replies
Nomenclature(1257) Disputed Banned
1 point

Oh? So you've intentionally ignored every word of the link.

YOU ARE THE ONE IGNORING THE LINKS, nobody else.

The majority of scholars identify Nazism in both theory and practice as a form of far-right politics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism#Position withinthepoliticalspectrum

The term (i.e. "far right politics") is often associated with Nazism,[4] neo-Nazism, fascism, neo-fascism and other ideologies or organizations that feature extreme nationalist, chauvinist, xenophobic, racist or reactionary views.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far-rightpolitics

Roderick Stackelberg places fascism—including Nazism, which he says is "a radical variant of fascism"—on the political right by explaining: "The more a person deems absolute equality among all people to be a desirable condition, the further left he or she will be on the ideological spectrum. The more a person considers inequality to be unavoidable or even desirable, the further to the right he or she will be"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism#Position inthepoliticalspectrum

YESTERDAY you claimed Wikipedia was a "leftist propaganda site". TODAY you are using it to quote Hitler.

YES BRONTO. Wikipedia is leftist propaganda and Hitler is a neutral source. Good one.

Side: Was times two
Support Dispute Clarify
↓ Show Replies
ilike2debate(320)
1 point

You banned yourself, well done. xD

Side: Was
Support Dispute Clarify

Browse More Debates