Liberals are the masses of George Orwell's 1984. Only they would think suppression of speech is freedom.

Well said..... the Liberals on this site merely play stupid and never admit the obvious truth of what you are saying.

Either they are dumb as rocks, or they are pure deceptive pretending not to see the obvious.

Either way, they are a waste of time to debate because they will never admit anything no matter how clearly you spell it out.

Hi to you all and thanks for the response.

Specifically for excon. What would you like to debate?

As stated my example was about the fall of free speech on college campuses. However if you want to talk about the rise of "blm" we can discuss that. We can discuss the fact its based purely on a liberal agenda and has no basis to its premises of widespread police racism. The fact that 50% of violent crime in America is committed by young black males who make up about 10% of the population. That is an easily checkable fact. So the fact that young black men are stopped more becomes less to do with racism and more to do with experience. We aren't allowed to express this view anywhere without being tarred and feathered. The reason I can happily say the police aren't predominantly racist with confidence is based on those statistics you would think there were hundreds if not thoussnds of black young men being killed by police every year. Is that the case? No is the simple answer. Last year I think there were 24 suspicious deaths of black men by police officers. Out of these some of them were while a crime was being committed or if you see some of the videos relating to the deaths there was some degree of non compliance or resisting arrest. So lets say half of them were somewhat legitimate so that leaves 12. ( my figures could be a little out is was quite a while ago I read the statistics on the FBI website) the % arent wrong though. So if we take the 12 unlawful shooting of black men its hardly an epidemic.

Or would you like to talk about that mystical mythical paygap between men and women. The same paygap that was debunked in the 70's as a very clever bit of propaganda by the feminists. Its still being reported by the liberal media as fact. Putin couldn't do a better pr job then the liberal media have done. It doesn't exist it never did. Yes if you take a thousand random men and add up their wages and then you take a thosand random women and add up their wages you get a difference in earnings.

The liberals and feminists stop their research right there. This is not a valid survey and its findings are at best unreliable. It doesn't take into account the different job sectors men and women work in. It doesn't take into account that many women only work part time. There have been surveys done by reputable institutions that show if you take like for like. That is men and women from the same job sectors and who work the same hours and have the same time served. You will see that women actually get paid more and get promoted faster then their male counterparts.

I could go on and on but my fingers are getting tired:)

Hello R:

Welcome to the site.. But, no. I'm NOT able to answer your bumper sticker, except to say, NAHHHH.. And, that's not satisfactory for either of us.. Gimme an issue.. Just ONE issue, and we can debate it.. Immigration?? The cops??? But, there's nothing to say when you just bad mouth liberals..

excon