CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
Neocolonialism, is it justifiable in anyway?
Many European countries and America try to politically influence African countries through aids.
A priest in Africa complained he was offered a lot of money by European church sponsors to be the ambassador of gay in his country for riches or have the aid cut short.(A man of God)
Just a few years ago, an African country was to be given loan by America on the condition that, it legalises gay, but since they refused, they never got the money.
What kind of demonic Agenda is being promoted here?
I personally think it has a lot to do with the attempt of the new world order spear headed by Satan himself but definately won't and apparently not succeeding.
These globalist elites are determined to infiltrate the church, use Islam to destroy, and turn the world into a post apocalyptic hell hole. We've begun the slide into the abyss already.
Beggars can't be choosers. If you don't like money that comes with conditions, you are perfectly free to get it from someone else, or better yet, acquire a sense of national pride and independence. Then you won't need to complain about what rich nations do with their money.
So i guess there will be nothing wrong with starting a world war in 15years time with more than half of the world against North America.....
I should start the anger from libya where they weren't beggars but were fooled and are now suffering. This statement is an insult to injury which gives libya more reason for vengeance. I could start the education of neocolonialism five years from now as a group concerntrating the education highly in lybia to ignite more and more anger. In ten years time, libya will start suicide bombing in Most North America and when caught, they will admit and yet protect their bombers, america will be first to officially initiate a war because they think the are strong. Surely, libya would have to call on all muslim brothers also giving the warning if they(libya) are overcomed, they(the rest)will be next....
So certainly,they will agree because first they already hate America.
They(libya) will get support from many African countries as many African countries would then be well educated and enlightened on neocolonism and understand the risk of America winning the war, which is; they will become more vulnerable than ever.
All African boaders blocked.
The closest America will ever get to libya will be at europe.
But they will be countered by russia(major ammunition suppliers)and North Korea who will certainly be against America.
Jamaica is a black country and must defend Africa in times of war, so, enemy troops can penetrate through jamaica.
Mexico will certainly not join North America.(explanation withheld)
Hopefully, columbia will not join North America and that will be the Ace position for accurate attack and North America is doomed.
After these affiliations established, any attack on any of the affiliated countries will properly trigger the war.
And these countries will need five more years( making it 15yrs) to build up weapons at one secret base.
All American satellites crossing boaders will be destroyed(where new ones will be built by us for us) ....and still gathering more members through education and promises of economic support.
All affiliated countries trade among themselves while waiting for America to attack first but having our forces 24/7 on guard(even with a common attire with country tags on them).
With this threat, America will lose influence and power politically and economically, gradually.
Europe would better be careful too.
3.7/4 of the world against the remainder America backed by europe certainly.
We will all agree to have russia to rule as the most powerful country in the world. We will direct our resources there to build them economically.
Neocolonialism will seize immediately.
Oh i forgot, China and Japan......So libya will have satisfaction from the suicide bombings as vengeance and America wouldn't/shouldn't dare try a retaliation as a wise thing to do.
Just a tip of the iceberg.
I guess now you get a vivid picture of what am saying, right?
I would normally approach this with the economical and resource argument method but not this time...it's too much insult
Perhaps your post was meant to intimidate. That is always the most pathetic tactic to use online. All you have illustrated is your lack of ability in fiction and in military strategy.
If you want neocolonialism to stop, I'm all in favor. If my country stops conditionally supporting your country, will you be happy?
That is always the most pathetic tactic to use online. All you have illustrated is your lack of ability in fiction and in military strategy.
No i mean it, it wasn't mere intimidation. I was just being brief.
I have this plan down and would have started execution but am christian so i won't. I am a savage and a resentless brute of no conviction without the believe in God(a greater being) exist(which i have solid proof for).
Adolf hitler forgot that.
If my country stops conditionally supporting your country, will you be happy?
No i wont, with or without. I don't like 'favours' backed with insults.
Both the money and conditions should stop, but then again, it's not all up to me .......right?
No, you can't. And even if you somehow manage to, that would destroy the world
i can kill neocolonialism without destroying the world but by just freezing the rage.
After affiliations are formed, North America won't be stupid to dare throw the first missle.
They will be angry but their hands will be chained with fear of jeopardy.
It will become quite clear to North America and Europe that, their former influence over those affiliated(armly) countries doesn't exist anymore.
They can not tell any country what to do ever again including those who haven't joined because they too are potential anti north America/ anti neocolonialism as they haven't chosen sides yet and too much political pressure from America can cause an enlargement in the affiliation.
That can hold as long as forever given the condition that affiliated countries in the future won't grow some stupid leaders who will begin to break away from the affiliation.
Stupid leaders may break away because they may feel the reason for the affiliation no longer exists, which is neocolonialism, which certainly, will totally die down over the years.
If that happens, i know North America never forgives, they will pretend calm and when the shielding of libya weakens they will attack libya even though they are already even(Qadafi /for blasting of a few citizens=1/1).
I guess i won't be around to witness the outcome of such stupidity which i could still solve if alive
But i will still be glad for doing my part(some sensible people should learn from.....am mortal), for making many countries enjoy at least a century of self respect and upheld dignity.
THE WORLD WON'T BE DESTROYED.
Hitler WAS a Christian.
We both agree on that, so what were you disputing?
He was a christ follower(christian)
Until still before he died, became a War follower. I think War is the makeup powder of lucifer. So he couldn't be following christ while he borrowed the makeup powder of Satan. Currently, the world knows him for the makeup appearance.
There will be no tension after i have presented my plan.
Ex. I can plant very destructive missles at a South American country without anyone seeing it coming.
By transporting different parts(1 at a time) of the missle on different ships(seen or unseen) and assemble them. I could use 2yrs to get three missles.
The experts on the machine who will assemble it can be in the country for about two years as coconut sellers living in a poor home.
Why would your own people accept a leader that puts their peace at stake,
Again, i wont be a leader.
I told you earlier i could freeze the rage and there will be no war.
But my people will have to choose between peace and integrity(which will give birth to greater peace in the long run).
Many African people think America is benevolent because they give aid.
I told one of my lecturers about some of Dermot's racist(about economic state) comments, he became so furious and ended the class five minutes after.
Yesterday,i told two my of mates what Amarel said and they were speechless, they went quiet immediately though they were in a delightful talk just a few minutes before. They voice i heard again was repeating what i had just said like a rescanning.
I can give reasons to every country in the world, backed by strategic planning
Hitler was believed to be a messiah during his time
Keeping such an affiliation alive and the world under tension would require resources. It'd be funny if you again end up in aids.
Not to mention anything that is in power or aspires to be would want such a thing dead and buried. They don't have a world under tension in their interests. So if, as you said, Illuminati is real, then they will remove any such affiliations from the world.
Keeping such an affiliation alive and the world under tension would require resources. It'd be funny if you again end up in aids.
Again, you show more of your ignorance.
My country alone, has more natural resources than the whole of US and Europe combined.
So imagine the whole Africa,Asia and Russia trading just among themselves, promoting specialization and exchanging services for resources or goods very cheaply for about just 15yrs.....
America has zero natural resources...since they will be out of the affiliation, in 15yrs they will fall short of Oil, Gold , etc. They will eat only chemical foods and cancer will increase, no one trades with them to buy their inventions or technology Because we will be trading with china and japan .
Do you know North Korea does not use American products and softwares.
So imagine half of the world not googling, facebooking ,buying apple products, .....
Famine will begin in America in 30yrs time… Gates, Buffet, zuckerberg's net income will fall drastically.
America lacks renewable resources, so America needs the world not the other way around.
But they are taking advantage of stupid and corrupt leaders of the other worlds before they(countries) realise who they are when it's too late for them, when America would have totally suppressed the world.
So if, as you said, Illuminati is real, then they will remove any such affiliations from the world
Powerful are few but together, weak are, because they are divided but then are much. But when the weaks share a common goal, it becomes the centre which holds them together and they become the MEGA POWERS.
Though it doesn't look like something that would succeed, if it does, you're going to have a lot of powerful enemies. It is, after all, against their interests that you make things so harder to control.
America has enough resources that the world can last half a century on them. I wonder where you are getting your data from.
North Korea won't use yours either. You know about the country, right?
Weak together are the true weak.
Not to mention that I could topple such a kingdom rather quickly. Even if Illuminati ain't real, you'd be dead in no time (or perhaps imprisoned).
Though it doesn't look like something that would succeed
You mean stirring up anger among already angry people?
Don't judge by looks.
you're going to have a lot of powerful enemies
But they won't reach me.
2. Power is just a delusion that arises from joined hands and forces or instruments, we are all naked, no one is powerful.
It is, after all, against their interests that you make things so harder to control.
I won't only stress their claws, i will actually break it off.
America has enough resources that the world can last half a century on them
You're sick and clueless.
America has nothing without the other countries.
The gold, oil, raw materials ,money(exports, softwares) are all not locally generated(minerals) from America, they will die gradually when they lose this priviledge given to them by the other world.
Go read about the pre colonial ages when America and Europe had not discovered Africa yet.
America and Europe were ugly and under developed.
America is what it is today because of Africa yet not satisfied and also insults Africa....they even steal mineral resources.
North Korea won't use yours either. You know about the country, right?
North hates only America. I had a north korean friend on facebook(who recently blocked me because i won't do what she wants) who was clear about that.
North Korean politicians travel to Africa always. The half brother of the North Korean president was recently poisoned in an African country.
Also, they need help to develop competitively to south korea.
Weak together are the true weak.
You can break one broom stick but cannot break a bundle of broom sticks.
you'd be dead in no time
Have you ever met anyone bullet cannot penetrate his raw body?
(or perhaps imprisoned).
Imprisoned by who? My people or U.S(in my own country?)...
Not that. Your knowledge about the required disciplines is severely limited - I'd recommend you take a little course on international relations and economics sometime.
No place is unreachable. You'd be spending a lot of money on security to even be able to think that you're safe. Power is merely a sum of things you're good at.
Breaking claws of those who might have sold their souls... shouldn't be really doable.
They import minerals, sure, but that isn't equivalent to them not having anything. There are a lot of reserves.
A North Korean using Facebook? I find that strange - everyone knows that they are allowed to use only propaganda websites.
Single broomstick isn't easy to burn, but a bundle is.
No, I haven't.
Imprisoned by anyone who removes you from the top. You aren't very persuasive, after all, though it might be different in your native language.
Your knowledge about the required disciplines is severely limited - I'd recommend you take a little course on international relations and economics sometime.
No it's you who doesn't understand my style. Its a break and breach of relation and getting the other to officially declare it.
That is why i said it should take 15yrs for a successful execution.
America will change presidents。。。very bad.
No place is unreachable. You'd be spending a lot of money on security to even be able to think that you're safe. Power is merely a sum of things you're good at.
After a breach, any entry into my land will begin the war. I won't buy security.
Everyone has a weak point
The political illuminatis feared Qadafi.
They couldn't touch him, so they used his people against him.
But that cannot happen again as i form my own illuminati and illumini people through education about who their enemies are and their strategies to make them prone to it because they will be able to perceive it next time.
They import minerals, sure, but that isn't equivalent to them not having anything. There are a lot of reserves.
Reserves will gradually fall when the conflict begins and they are not able to get in touch with the sources.
Plus, their export markets will die by over 60%.®
A North Korean using Facebook? I find that strange - everyone knows that they are allowed to use only propaganda websites.
Yh i know right? Should i give(inbox) you the name so you look her up or show you how they do it?
Single broomstick isn't easy to burn, but a bundle is.
Oh come on! That is the dumbest thing you ever said.
No, I haven't
You couldn't.
Over here people protect their lands with the land guards and you don't wanna have a quarrel with any. They are not of the government.
Imprisoned by anyone who removes you from the top.
What top?i repeat, i won't be a leader, i will be more like a catalyst.
You aren't very persuasive, after all, you think?
I managed to get 4/5 Of those i talked to about such topics to become furious.
The 1/5 is stupid. He has no sense of pride or dignity. He would gladly worship any whiteman For no reason.
He was even trying to justify it....
I could have banned him if i were the president for just 4secs of that moment.
But that cannot happen again as i form my own illuminati and illumini people through education about who their enemies are and their strategies to make them prone to it because they will be able to perceive it next time.
i won't be a leader, i will be more like a catalyst.
So, you want a puppet leader?
Well, what do you think happens when someone more efficient and persuasive than you stirs another revolution? (against you)
I could offer people peace, and they would fall to my favour. They will, of course, get to keep their integrity. The only thing to consider will be that any third party can not jump in - which, thanks to the anger you incite, will be easy.
So, if the affiliation is small, it's useless, and if big, it's unstable. Unless you're too willing to be just a transitionary sacrifice.
Should i give(inbox) you the name so you look her up or show you how they do it?
The latter one.
Oh come on! That is the dumbest thing you ever said.
I was wondering whether you'd notice.
you don't wanna have a quarrel with any.
Perhaps not right now, but that should change.
Also, I doubt India will be picking sides between Russia and USA.
Not a puppet per say but mind manipulation and touching the right spots, Illumining and backing with strategies.
The rest will be in the hands on the real leader. But i bet he can't resist it.
I could offer people peace,
They already have peace but in a small quantity. Absolute optimum peace is the goal.
and they would fall to my favour.
Who are you? What is your Message? Does it bring equal satisfaction as mine would?NO.
Well, what do you think happens when someone more efficient and persuasive than you stirs another revolution? (against you)
Everything is in favour of them not me, against me is against their own rights and freedom.
Plus who goes against a non leader?
It's supposed to be overwhelmly(over U.S) big and strong.
30 In Africa, Russia, Most Arab countries, China(Mega Mega), North Korea etc.
This ain't xbox Commedy.
I was wondering whether you'd notice.
Ah
Perhaps not right now, but that should change.
I'd like to see you try.
There are certain tribes here, whenever they start fighting, most soldiers sent there to stop them don't come back alive though they live in a very small town and lowly populated.
They still have a pending fight, they are waiting for one to make the first move.
It started from 1998 to ........can't tell.
If they start a fight in the U.S, it will take a week to kill the last one of them though aren't many, don't take breaks and don't use sophisticated weapons(usually swords and own made guns out of plastics).
Also, I doubt India will be picking sides between Russia and USA.
No one is actually taking sides with each other but the goal.
The goal is the centre which holds them together.
The central goal is like a well of fresh water which can quench the thirst of anyone who drinks from it. But the water is too deep below and people who want to drink from it must work together regardless of their differences to draw the water to serve and quench everyone's thirst.
Yes, absolute optimum peace. I can restore the tension and they would get to keep their integrity.
After all, I'm hostile towards no countries (sort of...) rather than, say, you. The least that could happen would be making them allies than staying in a tensed state.
You (or whom you put as leader) will then be imprisoned and perhaps executed. That's how it always has to be, after all.
And automatically, you don't know what you are even saying.You don't have a plan. Your first step to generating a plan is by understanding mine.
You speak as if its some protagonist, antagonist adventure tale
And the North Korean illegal software, i don't want to give you half info. I have been trying to contact a friend with full detailed info.(he seem quite busy)....// but i will certainly get it for you.
Which is present continues and automatically implies not instantly, .
Jesus cursed a tree which was not bearing fruit to die and it withered immediately, but did not break on to the ground or turn dust immediately, it probably took it about 30yrs(i guess)
Adam and eve i can say also withered after the curse when they lost their glory,(body covered in light).
And continued in the dying process.
Every man is actually dead already, its just taking long to break and rot just like the tree.
Oh, come on. Even after showing you where time has been implied, is that the best you can do? It's in both the KJV and the YLT, though has been removed in the NIV.
For in the day you eat of that tree, dying thou doest.
Dying(meaning a continues process because we have ing)
And he said the day you eat, dying(ing implying a continues process) thou doest.
So they lost their glory as a first of the process and the last will be through time, the body finally gets old and weak and finally breaks down back to dust or a hazardous attack can quicken it(poisoning, fire, fall, shot, punches etc.)
And about that tree, it was found the following day withered(already), it doesn't mean it was on that day they saw it again that it withered.
Though that's not the quote, I wonder why Young seemed obsessed to use middle English. "Dying thou dost die" probably was correct in the original language. The only thing that he changes is the sentence structure, so that it makes a little sense in English.
I repeat again, for it seems one time wasn't enough for you.
You should just be applauding me for making two different sentences make the same sense. How i did it(grammar, spiritual incite, whatever) is none of your business.
Simple and short, God did not say they will die immediately.
You really think that? There's still the theologians of James who studied the required languages to be able to put the Bible down in English. And it says,
for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
Which is present continues and automatically implies not instantly, .
Jesus cursed a tree which was not bearing fruit to die and it withered immediately, but did not break on to the ground or turn dust immediately, it probably took it about 30yrs(i guess)
Adam and eve i can say also withered after the curse when they lost their glory,(body covered in light).
And continued in the dying process.
Every man is actually dead already, its just taking long to break and rot just like the tree.
Your hollow promises have shifted the thread away from now-colonialism. Your biggest complaint seems to be that otherwise free money comes with conditions. I contend that money shouldn't be free and if the receiving party dislikes the conditions, they can give up the money. Insofar as these conditions are not forced, the. So-colonialism you describe is perfectly justifiable. The threat of removing a gift is not a threat of violence.
Money is traded for whatever a person is willing to trade, including conditions of all types if the price is sufficient. If you find the conditions are morally disgusting, then consider the moral worth of those willing to engage in said conditions for money. After you consider the moral worth of the money taker, try considering the moral worth of the money taker who then turns and slanders the money lender, only after you have money in hand of course.
Money is traded for whatever a person is willing to trade, including conditions of all types if the price is sufficient. If you find the conditions are morally disgusting,
Are you theist?
then consider the moral worth of those willing to engage in said conditions for money.
Am talking about offer not acceptance.
Even so, the presidents and priests here have never taken gay money offers.
Disgustful demonic Agendas.
slanders the money lender, only after you have money in hand of course.
No one has slandered no one, no one has taken such filthy monies.
Orelse my country would have been the first gay African country.
Ghana received 1.01M from the US in 2017. I would have rather it wasn't offered. But if it is offered I would rather it be offered with conditions. And if accepted I would prefer it be accepted with thanks rather than insults. And if it is accepted with insults, I would point out the moral depravity of someone who accepts charity while bashing the charitable.
You cannot compare money we owe as dept to money you received as charity. 1.01M was not lent to Ghana, it was given to Ghana. You might call it neocolonialism.
