It is hypocrisy because you say it is wrong to copy debates. Oh, and it isn't a fallacy, it was just a statement. Calling you a hypocrite was not challenging an argument you made.

You have a pretty shaky grasp on what does and does not constitute a fallacy. This is not limited to argumentum ad hominem, but many other ones you cite such as 'no true scotsman' and strawman arguments.

If somebody insults you, but also responds to your arguments, they are not committing any kind of fallacy whatsoever- though they are being rather rude.

Ad hominem arguments are specifically those made based on the real or perceived character of the opponent, rather than the content of the debate. Quite literally, something about the debater is used to dismiss their argument without addressing it. Examples of this would be one of the many troll personas on this site refusing to address an argument because the person making the argument is a 'liberal.'

"Are you really going to listen to an argument made by a liberal/abortionist/theist/whatever" is a solid example of argumentum ad hominem. "You're an idiot" followed by actual responses to your points is not argumentum ad hominem.

'Tu quoque' that you use rather frequently is similar; pointing out that the other party does the same thing is not a tu quoque fallacy unless it is left at that, and their argument is dismissed based on that. Pointing out that the other party does the same thing, and then going on to address their argument anyway is not tu quoque.

I'm not aware of many cases where you've legitimately been subjected to argumentum ad hominem. Many of your 'no true scotsman' assertions are either illegitimate or are grey areas. Many of what you call strawman arguments are not either.

A big fallacy that you are guilty of yourself is the 'argument from fallacy;' that is where a persons argument is dismissed in its entirety because a portion of it contained some form of logical fallacy. A logical fallacy only discredits the statements containing that logical fallacy. Even then, a statement including a logical fallacy isn't necessarily false- it can simply be the case that they have failed in their attempt to back the statement.

Hey, you figured it out. Good job.

You've banned two already! and one of them was one who commented on the fact that you've broken your title... I don't think it was an accident: "There are no accidents" ~ Master Oogway

Never said there weren't any. Just not many. I prefer a monarchy or dictatorship for religious reasons.