No one deserves anything for free
Agree
Side Score: 22
|
 |
Disagree
Side Score: 21
|
|
|
|
|
1
point
I agree. I believe that capitalism is more ethical, because more people keep more of their hard earned money. If you agree with the OP you hate capitalism, because capitalism has this thing called inheritance which means there is a class of people who literally are just handed wealth and success without having to earn it. Side: Disagree
0
points
I agree. I believe that capitalism is more ethical, because more people keep more of their hard earned money. If you agree then you are stupid and do not understand how capitalism works. Let me break it down for you. You do 100 dollars worth of work and get a dollar back for it. In fact, if you get an entire dollar you have a very good job. You're probably a doctor, or maybe a lawyer. The reason capitalism has been so successful is because people like you are so stupid. Sorry to be so blunt about it, but that's just the objective fact of the matter. Side: Disagree
0
points
No one deserves anything for free in this life. Whether it be housing, food, videogames, etc Really glad you agree, old chap. Now, how about giving the working class back all the profit their hard work produced and which you have stolen and swindled from them for your own personal benefit and luxury? Or lemme guess. Nah? Side: Agree
0
points
1
point
Have you checked with the MONARCHY before you TYPED some STUPID NONSENSE ???? Now, how about giving the working class back all the profit their hard WORK What is the PERSONAL TAX rate in the UK ?????? Well lets look into some facts !!!!!!!!! If you live in England, Wales or Northern Ireland and have taxable income of more than £150,000, you will have to pay the additional rate of 45% tax on the amount above this level. If you live in Scotland, you'll have to pay a top rate of 46%. DUMMY is the MONARCHY stealing from you ????????????????????? Side: Disagree
|
3
points
Then I assume you would like to abolish the concept of inheriting wealth and land? Everyone who ever lived got something for free. You were given your body and your life for free, you were given your mom's titty milk for free, you were given the culture you were born to and all the past developments and inventions of mankind for free. There is nothing wrong with getting things for free, it is actually unavoidable. The problem starts when you have a society where some are given less for free than is necessary for the development of a healthy and benevolent human being, and others are given far more than others and thus become spoiled, privileged little good for nothing cunts who are handed everything in life. Side: Disagree
1
point
1
point
1
point
Another jealous bastard heard from. Another useless sack of shit who thinks they are entitled to more than others because daddy was rich and bought you a helicopter for your 18th birthday. If someone is rich it's because they worked hard and earned it. Unless of course they "earned" it through inheritance, won the lottery, made some corny pop song and became a "one hit wonder" or they got rich by owning some asset or business that they don't even have to work to maintain a revenue stream from. You're an ignorant piece of trash. And why should anyone care if they give that money to their children? Answer: because they think it should be given to THEM. Why should anyone care that the Lord passes down his lands, wealth and titles to his offspring? Answer: Because capitalism is soft feudalism and the highborn never see the problem with them being handed everything while others have nothing regardless of the work they do or how smart they are. Well I do see the problem, there are a lot of useless rich people and a lot of great people who are held down by their financial situation, and I would gladly rob you of everything you have and give it to them. Side: Disagree
Well, although no one deserves, or should expect to have their living expenses paid for by the taxpayer the stark truth is that there are, and always will be groups of people who need to be supported. These groups include those who are incapacitated through long term illnesses, those who live in regions with high unemployment and, unlike immigrants, are too lazy to get on their bike and relocate to areas where they can secure a job. Then of course we have the most obnoxious group of all, those low life wasters who are fit and able but have no intention of ever engaging in gainful employment. This group then divides into two sub-groups. Group A) consists of the filth who are career criminals and group B) are those who lie and fart in bed all day waiting for their security cheque to arrive in the post. If these sub-groups are not supported by the taxpayer they will then evolve into a real and highly dangerous threat to the rest of society. Their resentment will engulf them and they will become terrorists, muggers etc.,and their criminal activities will cost more to service than it does to throw them a few food scraps and provide them with subsidised, low grade shelter. Whilst the government will always be in a damage limitation situation with the lower orders they must keep the TAXPAYER'S hand outs to a minimum. Side: Disagree
I don't have a problem collecting social security because I don't need to sponge off the hard working taxpayers. I ran my own successful business for over 30 years and provided full time employment for 120 employees during this period in a very deprived area of Belfast. I have a small, quite modest villa just outside Nice, Cote de' Azure, and enjoy a pleasant lifestyle at home. Losers, criminals and low lives are the main recipients of social security. ''Have to'', is a great master and many of those who receive Disabled Living Allowance Benefits could perform some useful function and receive payment for their services. Side: Disagree
1
point
there are, and always will be groups of people who need to be supported. In the future there will be no disabled or retarded people or poor people because biotechnology will develop enough to prevent DNA errors and fix just about any disability, and money and class won't exist so no one will be poor. Then of course we have the most obnoxious group of all, those low life wasters who are fit and able but have no intention of ever engaging in gainful employment. That reminds me of the millionaire I know who was given a business by his rich father and spends all his time doing drugs and playing video games while it generates millions of dollars for him. Whilst the government will always be in a damage limitation situation with the lower orders they must keep the TAXPAYER'S hand outs to a minimum. Governments and taxes won't even exist in the future, because I will abolish class hierarchy and the monetary system. Side: Agree
|
