CreateDebate


Debate Info

1
3
Nom sucks penis Nom be a homo wanker
Debate Score:4
Arguments:4
Total Votes:5
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Nom sucks penis (1)
 
 Nom be a homo wanker (3)

Debate Creator

EvilNom(146) pic



Nom accepts my challenge just to put his opinion in then drop out

This is the problem with liberal national socialist nazis, they want to force you to suck on their opinion like a hard hairy dick then they run away or just scream "racist" so they don't have to hear yours.

Nom sucks penis

Side Score: 1
VS.

Nom be a homo wanker

Side Score: 3
No arguments found. Add one!
0 points

Your inculcation into the capitalist narrative is so complete, so thorough, that you evidently do not see the problem with pretending capitalism still exists once you abolish it. There is no "afford" because that very concept is indigenous to capitalism. Hence, your question is meaningless and nonsensical.

Even if things don't cost anything, monetarily, they will still cost resources. So again, how can we have a society that just gives everyone things. Do you think we have unlimited resources?

Furthermore, you have things backwards if you believe socialism is going to give people a "free ride". The free rides are happening right now in the form of hedge funds, security exchanges and interest policies. Socialism is a proposed solution to the academic fact that the working class (i.e. the overwhelming majority) are being ripped off on a daily basis by the higher classes.

This is fallaciously sophistic and stupid. If people who have money want to give money to other people with money that's their choice, especially since they use it for big projects and businesses etc. whereas the masses would just spend it on themselves.

There cannot be any form of debate between us if you do not accept and understand the basic reality of the situation. If you want to argue black is white then I challenge your understanding of the word debate. Capitalism is a system where the rich are propped up by the poor. It is the literal definition of a free ride.

Do you think it's easy to run a business? You have to keep track of everything, so you need to be intelligent, and you have to worry about your employees so to run a successful business you need to have empathy to keep them productive and satisfied. That's why most rich people are actually hard working and good people, you need to have a lot of social awareness and understand what people want and give it to them. That's how the monetary system works, you have to work to make it work and you have to give people things that have value to them therefore these fat greedy jews you hate so much are just hard working smart people who give the people what they need/want and get to have access to monetary funds because of it. Wheras in your system you just give everyone everything and those hard working smart empathetic people are in no better standing to work there magic than some idiot who can't produce anything because he's an economically discombobulated socialist lackadaisical freeloader pants.

Side: Nom be a homo wanker
1 point

Even if things don't cost anything, monetarily, they will still cost resources.

Start reading the replies you are being given. Cost is a concept of capitalism. It costs nothing for me to give you resources. Under capitalism resources are paid for with money. Under socialism resources do not need to be paid for. Do you understand or would you like a small diagram?

So again, how can we have a society that just gives everyone things.

Because "things" do not cost anything until capitalists tell you that they cost something. Until then they are free. You see how that works, dopey?

This is fallaciously sophistic and stupid.

All sophistry is fallacious and therefore it is evident that you believe the way to "win" a debate is not to produce a coherent and accurate argument, but rather to plunder synonyms from the online thesaurus which you do not understand the meaning of.

You should not attempt to use big words if you are stupid. This is good advice and you should take it.

Do you think it's easy to run a business?

I think it is extremely easy to let a crew of people work all day and then pay you for the privilege, yes. I however fail to grasp what relevance your idiotic question has to anything I wrote.

That's why most rich people are actually hard working

This is false and stupid. Rich people do not need to work hard because they are rich. Poor people need to work hard because they are poor.

I cannot continue this debate because you are an idiot.

Side: Nom sucks penis
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

Cost is a concept of capitalism. It costs nothing for me to give you resources. Under capitalism resources are paid for with money. Under socialism resources do not need to be paid for.

How is it you Socialist get Consumable Goods ??????? Because it is obvious you have a computer LMMFAO

Side: Nom be a homo wanker
EvilNom(146) Disputed
1 point

Cost is a concept of capitalism. It costs nothing for me to give you resources. Under capitalism resources are paid for with money. Under socialism resources do not need to be paid for.

Shit for brains fuck face I didn't even disagree with you about that. What I am trying to insert into your stupid fucking twisted brain is that giving people resources costs RESOURCES whether it costs money or not. You need to learn how to read you dyslexic donkey. We don't have the RESOURCES to just give everyone everything.

Because "things" do not cost anything until capitalists tell you that they cost something. Until then they are free. You see how that works, dopey?

In a way you are right, there is no money in nature, but there is a scarcity of resources which are expendable in nature. In other words when you burn gas in your car it costs gasoline whether it costs money or not. That is why money is so useful and cool in the first place, when things are scarce the price goes up so it encourages wise resource management.

I think it is extremely easy to let a crew of people work all day and then pay you for the privilege, yes. I however fail to grasp what relevance your idiotic question has to anything I wrote.

It has to do with the fact that rich people are not doing what you just said, they are earning their money just like everyone else, they happen to get a lot more because they are the ones managing and leading and coming up with the big ideas like Bill Gates and Trump.

This is false and stupid. Rich people do not need to work hard because they are rich. Poor people need to work hard because they are poor.

Again I ask you, do you think being president and running microsoft is an easy job? Trump and Gates are way richer than you for one simple reason: You are a stupid little piss ant commoner and they are better than you.

Side: Nom be a homo wanker