Non-racist National Socialism
Possible
Side Score: 1
|
 |
Not possible
Side Score: 3
|
|
|
|
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|
@SlaveDevice You have argued elsewhere that people respond to your submission in a "knee-jerk" reaction manner & thus your ideas are not given a fair say. Now, I think I have engaged you on this topic (elsewhere) without being guilty of this, however I'm still waiting for an answer to some fundamental questions that are staples to the view you are promoting (that I see as highly problematic). Lets start with one issue (as I see it); You have suggested that a "test" is sufficient to determine who the most intelligent & thus worthy (of life) individuals are, and such a "test" should be universally administered to quantify. Now, what such "test" do we know of that is at all capable of determining this (and even if it were the case, how do you distinguish between hereditary intelligence & environmentally influenced intelligence--as only hereditary intelligence is relevant from the perspective of Artificial Selection)? Side: Not possible
2
points
Thanks for your time - both here and other places. I’m not happy that humans have reached the point that they are a scourge to Mother Earth- but humans have failed to plan, they just keep expanding and are never satisfied with a meager existence. I simply am saying humans have become a problem and may ruin our planet - and if you must toss some overboard, you definitely don’t want to toss the deadbeats that are lazy and can’t imagine the future. Side: Possible
@SlaveDevice Thanks for your time - both here and other places. Its my pleasure--I'm interested in discussing with people of quite different positions/perspectives than my own. I hope our correspondence can be mutually beneficial I’m not happy that humans have reached the point that they are a scourge to Mother Earth- but humans have failed to plan, they just keep expanding and are never satisfied with a meager existence. I agree I simply am saying humans have become a problem and may ruin our planet Agreed and if you must toss some overboard, you definitely don’t want to toss the deadbeats that are lazy and can’t imagine the future Here, we diverge. I understand the principle behind your argument, however I don't agree that we need to "throw people overboard"--in our current situation at least. Have you seen my Thread exploring the Superiority of a Meritocratic Oligarchy over a Democratic Republic as well as my Thread discussing a new format for Constrained Market System--as these were intended to address many of the concerns you are raising here--without the need to systemically execute/exterminate large masses of the population? Side: Not possible
1
point
@SlaveDevice There is strong reason to believe that even average-range Human intellect is capable of extraordinary feats (by modern standards) & has barely even began to be tapped into. The problem is the environment it is raised into & product of that (currently) causes rampant, mass ignorance & stupidity. I have discussed this matter further on CD and can link you to it if you are interested Side: Possible
|
