CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:29
Arguments:21
Total Votes:45
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Progressives care more for a women's choice while Pro lifers care more for a human life. (19)

Debate Creator

Cuaroc(8826) pic



Progressives care more for a women's choice while Pro lifers care more for a human life.

So tell me which person has true compassion and tolerance? Before responding, DO NOT bring up life of mother or extreme case abortions because these extreme case abortions are not disputed by the GOP. Keep the conversation to what you choicer's support, which is all abortions for any reason.

So here are the priorities of choicer's... convenience, financial situation, control.

The priorities of pro lifers... the right of life for all innocent human lives regardless their financial situation or inconvenience.

So when did the Progressive Left and Democrat Party decide that the value of an innocent human life is conditional? Oh, I forget, it happened when the life of an unborn Baby became political and helped corrupt politicians getting elected.

Abortion flies in the face of every Liberal Progressive who claim to believe in tolerance, inclusivity, open mindedness, diversity of Special Need's babies, etc.

Your's is the side of self love, intolerance, antipathy for the diversity of Special Need's babies, etc.
When voting for Democrat politicians who support No Restriction abortions, you are saying that viable unborn lives means nothing to you. That makes you total phonies when it comes to true compassion for the least of us.

The vast majority of Pro Choice people refuse to compromise and limit abortions to extreme cases only, yet these cases are all they rant about to hide their true inhumanity. Phonies and hypocrites!
-FromWithin
Add New Argument
1 point

Now we will hear the same old rhetoric of how women should have control over their own body.

Yes I agree, and the other life inside of the mother should also have control over their body. Their life is also deserving of protection unless the mother's life is in danger.

-FromWithin

John_C_1812(279) Disputed
1 point

A point to be made is all sided fail the United States Constitution. Were the legality of the admission being made public has its own weight to maintain order. The debate is over Pregnancy abortion as the admission of guilt, is pregnancy abortion an admission of guilt, or not? I do not know if that question can be asked any clearer. It has an alibi to the admission? Does this admission need to be used to describe medical emergency procedures even though it openly violates the Hippocratic Oath?

Neither person has true compassion. Supporting of Pregnancy abortion has an identification issue that needs to be made clear as admission to guilt. This identification is important for only then can people start explaining why all woman must make this self-incriminating confession. The choice of one woman to make this admission is not the same as all woman must make this admission.

1 point

Psalm 137:9

Blessed is he who seizes your infants

and dashes them against the rocks.

Cuaroc(8826) Clarified
2 points

FromWithin is quite the Christian. Down-voting verses from his holy book.

1 point

Now as always we will hear bigoted choicer's talking about verses in the Bible symbolically speaking to killing their brutal enemies in war, even their children.

So here is the ludicrous excuses of those who support killing even viable babies, FOR ANY REASON, and then comparing that to children dying in war.

Do you understand the meaning of hypocrite? For any person to support killing innocent viable babies, FOR ANY REASON, and then judging verses in the Bible symbolically speaking to killing the children of those who killed their own children, is beyond being a total hypocrite and far worse then anything that could ever happen in war.

We are talking about killing innocent babies for mere convenience, not in revenge against brutal enemies.

I would also speak out against killing children in war, but have no clue how I would feel if brutal enemies killed my children.

-FromWithin

Cuaroc(8826) Clarified
1 point

Remember people the bible is only symbolic when it doesn't support your agenda.

John_C_1812(279) Disputed
1 point

Is pregnancy abortion an admission of guilt, or not?

It is only an admission of guilt that would support any presumption of guilt to murder. The official end of life is a vast topic, and does not answer the question raised. Please stick to the question.

1 point

Speaking to yourself Cuaroc does show you are mentally unstable

The United States Constitution does not expect any person to not be religious in every way. Constitutional law expects that a religious person can hold themselves impartial, if only for the moments required to hold trial. Both are conspiring against independence.

Is pregnancy abortion an admission of guilt, or not?

Is Female Specific Amputation and admission of guilt, or not?

Hello.

Here in the forum, I see people who have promoted the idea that the Bible commanding to kill little children and women is somehow equivalent to the late-term abortions performed on little babies.

When You go to War against a Nation the Often need and the Custom and Practice was to Kill their Women and Children as well..

The United States went to war against Germany, Italy, Japan, Vietnam, and Against Muslims too. We KNOW Full and Well that the WHOLESALE Slaughter of Woman and Children is a mandatory and an absolute must. It happens In every single Major war, once the major battles have been fought.

the woman and teenage children work to Keep the War Machine Going. The Woman and Youth of our enemies worked to make Bullets, Clothing, Medical Packs, and Boots and Other Bomb making tools and explosives, all various Instruments of War and the little children, schools, nurseries, and babies are often located where they store important supplies.

The Woman and Children of the Enemy are Just as important as the Soldiers. The Woman and Youth FILL the Factories and Work to make supplies and Tools and to AID their Soldiers. We Crushed our Enemies. Destroyed these Factories and Plants and Storage facilities. Woman and Youth, work around the Clock to Prepare Food and medical Kits for the Soldiers. these Woman and Children are a major TARGET in a Real War.

In little police actions and small military ops, where we have the Upper hand. We can Pretend that Woman and Children are special. But when it comes to a REAL WAR. All that garbage goes out the door.

THE FACT IS..............................

If - You are Fighting Several Enemies at once, OUTNUMBERED and Losing Men and suffering and loosing and prolonging the war by keeping these Woman and Children alive, just to be RECRUITED Again by another enemy and help them over a span of several centuries, the Children of the Enemy Grew up to be Adults. New Warriors, NEW Fighters, NEW TERRORISTS who were TAUGHT and raised and trained to HATE and Kill and make war against the Jews, who had Killed their Fathers.

The best Way was to Completely destroy the Enemy and those who attacked you Completely and Fully.

The Hebrews were behaving normal. After being attacked by Overwhelming odds and being abused by their Neighboring Nations, the Jews Finished the Wars and Won and survived, by Killing Woman and Children. Millions and Millions and millions of Woman and Children have died in WW ll, in Vietnam, in The Middle East. had we not Killed WOMEN and CHILDREN in these REAL WARS. We would have never, EVER won the wars and would not survive.

I am Glad to Discuss this with You....... Perhaps You would rather that the Hebrews had not Survived ?

they did not want to allow the Children of their Enemy to grow up and continue fighting against them and they did not want to ADOPT them because they were the Children of their Enemy.

The Bible was about protecting babies and protecting life.

Today, If You are gay or have had any gay sex within the last year - You are banned from donating blood and organs. In the Bible days, there were no treatments, tests, medicines and antibiotics, cures, surgeries and modern advanced technologies. Once You catch a disease You and everyone that You knowingly infect are doomed to suffer a horrible, painful and excruciating, torturous and agonizing Painful horrible death. You beg for someone to knock You in the head and get it over with as Your penis or guts or liver or organs are literally slowly rotting off - with no painkillers, no treatments, and medicine. The Jews were being constantly attacked and were in a constant state of war. They were always on the run and living and surviving with all of Your neighbors attacking You is nearly impossible especially when Your neighbors are also spreading diseases in the water supply and by having seXual contact with people in Your Own Neighborhoods. Leviticus has explained many of the details of the violent, evil behaviors of the neighbors of the Israelites who were allied against Israel and attacking them ...... for even their sons and their daughters, they have burnt in the fire to their gods. .... Lev 18:3 ... ye not do: and after the doings of the land of Canaan, do not walk in their ordinances. Lev 18:7 INCEST - causing blood problems. - Lev 18:20 Adultery - causing blood problems. - Lev 18:21 BURNING little Children in a fire. Lev 18:22 HOMOSEXUALITY - causing blood problems. Lev 18:23 BEASTALITY - causing blood problems.

There were diseases, plagues and at their last stages of dying from homosexual/gay rectal, bowel cancers and stomach cancers. Homosexuals place others in danger. i know the pain, I have spent time in the trenches. changing diapers cleaning up vomit and bathroom and bloody foam from the mouth as the gay dies in agony.

0 points

Pro lifers , for the most part, only care for "human life" before it passes through the birth canal. After that, you're on your own! (Note how the current occupier of the White House has taken health care away from children, shut down Planned Parenthood … the only health care many pregnant women …. pre and post natal … could afford!) That's the reason we have one of the largest "infant death after live birth" records in the world! (in 2012 it was 174th out of 193 countries) I'm sure you will see it rise from 174th in the next few years. Nothing to be proud of, pro-lifers!

Amarel(4987) Disputed
1 point

Pro lifers , for the most part, only care for "human life" before it passes through the birth canal. After that, you're on your own!

No, for the most part pro lifers raise their kids.

That's the reason we have one of the largest "infant death after live birth" records in the world!

No, we really don’t.

https://www.infoplease.com/world/health-and-social-statistics/infant-mortality-rates-countries

outlaw60(15500) Disputed
0 points

Pro lifers , for the most part, only care for "human life" before it passes through the birth canal. After that, you're on your own! (Note how the current occupier of the White House has taken health care away from children, shut down Planned Parenthood … the only health care many pregnant women …. pre and post natal … could afford!) That's the reason we have one of the largest "infant death after live birth" records in the world! (in 2012 it was 174th out of 193 countries) I'm sure you will see it rise from 174th in the next few years. Nothing to be proud of, pro-lifers!

Crazy Al of Road Island your Mommy and Daddy must have been pro life if not you would not be typing LMMFAO !

Progressive entertainment value grows and by the way Crazy Al if you were not pro life why is it you had children ROTFFLMMFAO

-1 points

I wish prolifers would feed the baby after he is born..........................................................

Amarel(4987) Disputed
2 points

Why stop at babies? Why don’t we make all people who are against killing people feed the people who haven’t been killed?

0 points

God expects His children to do justice to those who have need. For your info, I am involved in looking for work, but what about the working poor? I want everyone to have affordable healthcare like single payer which saves lives.

Gibby_Prime(38) Disputed
1 point

I wish prolifers would feed the baby after he is born..........................................................

What are you talking about? Where did you get this idea from? Of course the baby gets fed, ALL newborns get fed (except those who die early of some cause). I mean, why would a prolifer not feed the newborn? That would be against what a prolifer does, apart from the fact that the prolifer WANTS the fetus to not be killed in the first place.

Man, I wish prochoicers would care for the right to life of an unborn baby...

outlaw60(15500) Disputed
-1 points

I wish prolifers would feed the baby after (he?) is born.

Did your pro life Mommy and Daddy not feed you after you were born LMMFAO !

You are Real Dummy and entertaining as well.