CreateDebate


Debate Info

5
21
It's a good compromise. Wait..., what? No!!!
Debate Score:26
Arguments:25
Total Votes:26
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 It's a good compromise. (4)
 
 Wait..., what? No!!! (15)

Debate Creator

jolie(9810) pic



Religious people should use a different word for marriage.

 

Gays refused to accept the words, "Civil Union," and fought for the word, "Marriage."

 

The government could have allowed religion to have a monopoly on the word, "Marriage," while they themselves used the words, "Civil Union" exclusively for every union (in order to differentiate between a religious marriage and a state sanctioned marriage).  But they didn't.

 

For the longest time, it was called "Gay Marriage."  So, now that the law of the land is that the word "Marriage" will be used exclusively by the government to refer to every state sanctioned union, it may be time for the religious die-hards to take matters into their own hands and stop using the word "Marriage."  Perhaps they can invent some new word or they can always fall back on the words "Religious Marriage." 

It's a good compromise.

Side Score: 5
VS.

Wait..., what? No!!!

Side Score: 21
1 point

Better yet, they can call it a "Holly Union."

Oh, wait.... I got it.... call it a "Proliferating Union." Proliferating because only a man and a woman can "naturally" proliferate and the word, "Proliferate" has the words, "Pro," "Life" and "Rate." Then they can define a "Proliferating Union" as a union between a man and a woman for the purpose of proliferating. Which makes it a Pro-Life Union, meaning that people in a "Proliferating Union" cannot have abortions (everyone else can have all the abortions they want). They can then state that all other unions do not "Rate" (meaning, they are not "real" unions).

A rose by any other name is still a rose.

NOTE: This solution will end the "Gay Marriage" debates AND the Abortion debates once and for all!!! Yay me, for coming up with the final solution!!!

Man! Can I think outside the box, or what?

While everyone else is out partying on this 4th of July, I was diligently sitting here trying to solve the world's problems.

Side: It's a good compromise.
1 point

Oh, wait.... I got it.... call it a "Proliferating Union." Proliferating because only a man and a woman can "naturally" proliferate and the word, "Proliferate" has the words, "Pro," "Life" and "Rate."

Mind. Blown.

Side: It's a good compromise.
3 points

A resounding never. Nobody has any right to alter what God instituted and marriage itself would not exist otherwise. It is an insult to demand such a sacrifice. Therefore, for the religious 'die-hards' as you call them, no compromise is needed because the definition has not changed, however the government and society at large wish to tamper with it. Marriage was, is and always will be between a man and a woman.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
2 points

Well.... during Jesus' time, it wasn't called "marriage," so....

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
Foxglove(205) Disputed
1 point

I'm sorry, what? The word 'marriage' is used throughout the Bible so even before Jesus' time - what did you think it was called?

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!

ISIS has a word for "Marriage" and gays aren't allowed to appropriate its usage. As a matter of fact, any gay person who attempts to use that word gets killed. Maybe you can use that word. ;)

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
skyfish(276) Clarified
1 point

so what you are saying is that YOU would not want to be in a same sex marriage.

that's fine.

but now you don't get to say what other ppl do, its not up to you... and it was NEVER any of your business to begin with.

Side: It's a good compromise.
2 points

Jesusiage! Like.. " hey baby, will you Jesusisy me?

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

They should instead simply EVOLVE already and get used to the idea that they don't own marriage and never did.

pro tip: you can't spell LOVE without EVOLVE.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

And you can't evolve without EVE so...

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1 point

it's true that sexual reproduction allows for faster evolution, but asexual reproduction can still evolve due to random "errors" in the duplication process.

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!