CreateDebate


Debate Info

47
49
SHOULD NOT SHOULD BE
Debate Score:96
Arguments:71
Total Votes:112
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 SHOULD NOT (26)
 
 SHOULD BE (27)

Debate Creator

darshitdesai(35) pic



SHOULD ISLAM BE BLAMED FOR THE ALL TERRORIST ATTACKS?

For any terror attack a muslim is blamed whether it is in The India OR it is the USA. Is this not raging fires in muslims. Souldn they be blamed for every attack. Is it not against the HUMANITY? Think they shouldn't be blamed but always the proof is against them and I Believe in PROOFS. So whats your argument ................  

SHOULD NOT

Side Score: 47
VS.

SHOULD BE

Side Score: 49
5 points

Here's what's happening: There is a struggle within Islam between fundamentalists and moderates. The entire religion is split by those who want to live in the modern world (Where human rights exist) and the ancient world where they do not. The moderate Muslims, actually fear the actions of the fundamentalists, as would any civilized individual.

I choose the word fundamentalists to refer to Islamic terrorists. This is because they cling to the beliefs of an ancient world, where much more primitive social norms were accepted. Christianity made this shift over two thousand years ago. Had this not happened, Christians would still be stoning sinners in their streets. Until Islam is able to fully enter the modern world, we will all suffer at the hands of these misguided believers in a way of life that no longer fits in the modern world.

Our part in this struggle, is to align with and strengthen the moderate Muslim world in it's struggle to banish the fundamentalist fanatics.

Side: SHOULD NOT
3 points

Terrorism comes in many forms :-

The IRA for instance committed acts of terrorism and they were not Muslim.

When Mandela fought against apartheid he was not a Muslim, by some he was a freedom fighter by others a terrorist - he was jailed for terrorism.

Side: SHOULD NOT
darshitdesai(35) Disputed
4 points

NELSON MANDELA was not jailed for terrorism he was jailed for TREASON CHARGES against his own country.

Side: SHOULD BE
NicolasCage(505) Disputed
2 points

Which translates to terrorism. Terrorism is essentially a subcategory of treason. Committing an act of terrorism within your own country would be seen as treason, which is why Mandela was wrongly imprisoned of treason.

Side: SHOULD NOT

The religion can itself be blamed if that were isolated with it, but that also means extending the blame to all those Muslims who aren't terrorists.

We can blame Christianity for crusades, Hinduism for the rigid caste system, Sikhism for the terrorism (a few decades ago) and similarly other religions.

If you really want to blame a religion, then make it stronger.

Unless you're part of the group that hates Muslims already. Anything will work then.

Side: SHOULD NOT
4 points

You can blame the Christians for the Crusades? They were fighting for their right to exist. The Islamic empire was taking over that entire part of the world by force and conquest.

Side: SHOULD BE
1 point

Yes, that's also what happened.

I'm referring to the internal fights.

(At least you are a little bit right here...)

Side: SHOULD NOT

make it stronger.

I just noticed that it's vague. By 'it' I mean the blame.

Side: SHOULD NOT
2 points

Terrorists cause terrorism, not Muslims/Islam.

A person cannot blame all Muslims for Islamic extremism but at the same time claim that not all Christians are responsible for the acts of radical Christians.

Side: SHOULD NOT
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
2 points

Muslims are not of the Religion of Islam ? If they are not then please clear that up for me.

Side: SHOULD BE
NicolasCage(505) Clarified
2 points

A Muslim is one whom believes and follows Islam, yes.

.....

Side: SHOULD NOT
2 points

Yes Isis is a radical Islam movement that fell like terrorism is the way to go but the Muslim holy book codems violence, the only reason this argument exists is because the religion of Christianity tries to cover up all their past terrorism related incidences. If you think about it the last 10 years there have been more non Muslim terrorist attacks. There are more individuals that are not representatives of the religion that they say they stand for. This argument pisses me off.

Side: SHOULD NOT
2 points

Thoughts like this are why immigrant Americans are so commonly discriminated against. People who love america. Muslims are just people. Americans are just people. Shouldn't people get along with people? People = people after-all.

Side: SHOULD NOT
1 point

yes, in theory. The problem is that Muslims are commanded to not coexist with non-Muslims in the Quran. Islamic terrorists in mass aren't just some strange manifestation of bad luck. No, they are doing exactly what Muhammad commanded them to do, thus people are beheaded, set on fire, drowned in cages, etc, and Muslims are cutting themselves and their children with swords, and women are caged in burkas like animals. Nevermind the cutting off hands, fingers, and stonings for "being and adulterer"...

Side: SHOULD BE
NowASaint(1380) Clarified
0 points

...........................................................................................

Side: SHOULD NOT
2 points

Well, I'd like to remind us all that there are non-extremist, normal families living in America who are afraid of the backlash against the Muslim community. There is modern Islam and fundamentalist Islam; while Islam isn't my favorite, it is their 1st amendment right to practice any religion, and I support them. I do not like fundamental Islam, which can easily become radical due to the social requirement to swear by the fundamentalist way. Kind of like how extremely religious parents will force said religion onto the children. Very easy to be corrupted and lose the human element of other beings in the world.

I believe this fundamental Islam practice needs to die out in order to forge future relationships in Islamic countries. It also doesn't help when ISIS, Al Queda, etc. come up and deface the Muslim community here in the US.

Side: SHOULD NOT
1 point

No. We should put the blame on the terrorists. There are more peaceful Muslims than there are terrorists and blaming all Muslims for the actions of extremists is incredibly lazy and ignorant. There are very few religions that haven't had issues with extremist factions bringing terror and death to others.

Side: SHOULD NOT
1 point

Islam is not to blame for terrorist attacks, radicalism is. Any of the Christian, Jewish or Islamic religions can be twisted radically, (and HAVE been many times). Today all three are being twisted to different levels. Radicalism of any religion usually gets deadly. The quote: "Men never commit evil so fully and joyfully as when they do it for religious convictions." (Blaise Pascal), has been true for centuries. You can't blame just one religion, they seem to take turns. Sure, Islam has a LOT of unacceptable "laws" that would be illegal in America. Christianity has "modernized" somewhat ....IT could not exist in America if it hadn't, Islam has too ... in America, the rest of the Islamic world must catch up to be accepted here. The terrorists take the worst of the ancient "teachings", the lines of "control" and use them (twist them) to their best advantage. That's what ALL radicals do. You can't blame all Christians for the death that some have caused, you can't blame all Muslims for the death that some have caused.

Obama accepts this, he doesn't blame ALL Muslims for the actions of radicals. He gave about a hundred of them a "piece of his mind" this week! If King Donald keeps us as safe as Obama has, I will thank him.

Side: SHOULD NOT
1 point

Not all terrorists are Muslim. Terrorists come from all walks of life...........................

Side: SHOULD NOT
darshitdesai(35) Disputed
1 point

please can you give me examples with the proof on this statement. Is there any proof that any Hindu, Christian, Jew, Buddhist, etc. are in terrorist groups.

Side: SHOULD BE
Gypsee(347) Disputed
2 points

Read about what is going on in Central African Republic. Terrorist killing in the name of Christianity.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-26274198

Jewish terrorists

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/ 12/151224-israel-jewish-terrorism-arson-christian-church-multiplication/

I believe there is also the saffron terrorists (Hindu terrorism).

The only reason we only hear about Muslim terrorists is because they attacked on our ground. I will remind you that these Muslim terrorists kill a LOT MORE Muslims than non-Muslims.

Side: SHOULD NOT
1 point

what is terrorist?terrorist can defined as a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims

Terrorism does not equal to Islam.Every religion including Islam is a religion of peace . We should not stereotype Islam just because idiotic act of ISIS.

Terrorism can be committed in various form and by various group . It does not necessary attached only to Islam.

Side: SHOULD NOT
6 points

Islam is reason for terrorist attacks across the world but Progressives are blind to that reality. Truth and Reality is not a world the Progressives can exist in.

Side: SHOULD BE
4 points

They should be blamed why not. I do have reasons also: 1) All leaders of terrorists group are Muslims, isn't it then give examples. 2) When in Paris the journalists wrote a controversial joke on ISLAM AS TERRORIST the all ISLAMIC REPUBLIC COUNTRIES came to know about it after the TERRORIST group attacked and kill many terrorists so aren't the terrorists by doing this act for ISLAM giving us clue for their being of ISLAMIC. 3) PAKISTAN a Islam following country is the LEADING PRODUCER of the terrorists or the Jihadis and they call themselves JIHADIS which is related to the Muslims only.

Side: SHOULD BE
3 points

Any religion which can spawn such vile murderous scumbags must be fundamentally evil.

In modern times followers of Islam have been responsible for the most atrocious crimes in the history of mankind and have found justification for their acts of inhuman barbarity in the teachings of the Koran.

Where are the Muslim peace marches?

Where are the open condemnations of the Islamic terrorists by Muslim Church leaders?

There are two great evils in the world today, terrorism and cockeyed religion. Islam represents both of these, and indeed they're both one of the same.

The sanctimonious 'do-gooders'' are as much a threat to all the civilizations of the world as the Muslim terrorists themselves.

Side: SHOULD BE
2 points

Where are the Muslim peace marches?

Where are the open condemnations of the Islamic terrorists by Muslim Church leaders?

http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/1.686182

They're everywhere. There's one example. But even if there wasn't, it is not the responsibility of Muslim citizens worldwide to specific that they don't support mass genocide. Do you really have such little respect for your fellow human beings you don't think they understand that terrorism is bad?

Side: SHOULD NOT
Antrim(1287) Disputed
1 point

As usual your heads full of mad dog's shit.

Take a whiff at what it is you're trying to shovel.

Side: SHOULD BE

Islam the religion followed in any countries has terrorist in it (here terrorist means who disrupts the world peace). Man have given proofs and we do have ISIS in SYRIA AND IRAQ, AL- QAEDA in PAKISTAN, TEHRIK - E- TALIBAN in PAKISTAN, LASHKAR - E - TAIBA in PAKISTAN, AL - SHAABAB in SOMALIA, HEZBOLLAH in LEABANON, BOKO HARAM in WEST AFRICA, TALIBAN in AFGHANISTAN. These all groups have Islamic leaders. They are:

ISIS- ABU BAKR AL-BAGDAD

AL-QAEDA- AYMAN AL-ZAWAHIRI

TEHRIK E TALIBAN- MULLAH FAZULLAH (MAYBE killed in airstrike says many news reports)

LASHKAR E TAIBA - HAFIZ SAEED

AL SHAABAB- AHMED ABDI GODANE

HEZBOLLAH - HASSAN NASHRALLAH

BOKO HARAM- ABUBAKAR SHEKAU

TALIBAN- MAWLAWI HAIBATULLAH AKHUNDZADA

so you can see that all main terrorist groups do have thier leaders as MUSLIMS.

Side: SHOULD BE

Many Muslims are peaceful but the ones that are purists try to kill all people that are not muslims. Osama Bin Laden was Islamic and look what he did. He tried to destroy America and kill the president. I know that most of them have changed and are peaceful, but the purists groups like ISIS are still out there.

Side: SHOULD BE

Do you think Christians, atheists, Greeks, and other religions attack and bomb everybody? Some countries do that because they are trying to defend themselves. Islam does it so they can kill off people.

Side: SHOULD BE
1 point

koran 2:191- Slay unbelievers where ever you find them

Koran 3:85 - Any religion other than islam is unacceptable

Koran 5:33- Maim and crucify anyone who criticizes Islam

Koran 9:30 - The jews and christians are pervert,fight them

Still consider Muslims peaceful?

Side: SHOULD BE

Nope. Just the 90+% that they commit because the Quran and Muhammad commanded them to.

Side: SHOULD BE