CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
Who is this person named Science? I'm all for science but it makes science seem dogmatic where it isn't when people say: science says this, science says that. I think we should be more mindful of that.
It's amazing how the Left uses science when it suits them. When the convienence of aborting innocent babies out weighs the value of their lives, the Left ignores science.
Science, schmienze... Abortion is when the rights of the unborn are pitted against the rights of the mother.. It AIN'T no more difficult than that.
You choose the baby. I choose the mother.
The fact is, NEITHER position is MORE moral than the other one.. Oh, I know, you'll claim some righteous attitude about YOU being right and everybody else wrong.. But, I'm used to that stuff from you..
By the way, you can call me all sorts of names, and I'm sure you will.. And, you can ONLY do that because I haven't banned you..
If you were not such a hypocrite, you might grasp your ignorance to the fact that most of your arguments could be used against you.
Your so called Climate change science does exacty what you just claimed abortion does.
It pits the right's of people who do not want to pay higher taxes and higher electricity costs, while other nations refuse to do so.
You say the planet is dieing. I say innocent human lives are being purposely killed while you ignore science.
It pits our rights against there's.
Can you now grasp why your cherry picked science is only used when it suits you.
Climate change is not a proven man made thing. Killing even viable babies is happening and is supported by the likes of you. It is proven fact.
You sit there saying you are comparing the rights of women and the baby. HOGWASH!
No one is killing the mother! We allow life of mother abortions. You support taking the Baby's right to life away from it all because you care more for the convienence of the mother's lifestlye.
LOOK WITHIN! You are absolutely 100% wrong and you know it but don't care. Sick!
No kidding! Here's a newflash. IT'S NOT OK TO ANY PERSON WITH AN OUNCE OF HUMANITY!
The sick part is that those in the Democrat Party are tied to the feminist and pro abortion lobbies, and they will always say it is ok to kill babies for any reason all the way up to birth.
The value of an innocent human life is based on politics, and people like you will keep right on voting for those who keep the inhumanity legal.
Science says that Leftist are born even during an eclipse and a full moon or a half moon during the day be it partly cloudy or blue bird skies. Now can you apply the science to other earthly events when Leftist are born ?
The bible said israelites would run, return and in planes which didn't exist as at that time.
They run, returned, and in aeroplanes.
The bible made predictions about world eras after nebuchadnezzar even the attempt of new world order of one world government and it's failure, as far as i know it is still failing. It is even now more evident that china and russia have become so powerful and strong competition for america.
Prediction about the earth state in space before anyone artificial flight was made to travel outside earth.
The bible predicted the darwinian myth, television, cars, etc........
Excon i suppose you have a car. You can deny but there are more cars i see everyday to serve as evidence.
Applicable here- Bible.
All won't happen spontanuosly..... more prophecies to be fulfilled just a matter of time.
Do you actually believe the words that you write? Darwinian myth? Are fossils a myth? Is the evolution we have seen happen with our own eyes (eg, peppered moth of Manchester) a myth?
The Bible didn't "predict" anything. It's a crock of lies and fiction from the beginning to the end. Whenever something in the Bible gets disproved you call it "allegory" and on the rare occasions you can twist its words to resemble something which actually happened you take it literally.
Religion -- and anyone who follows it -- is by definition mentally ill.
You don't even know what the Bible says. I've debated you numerous times, and proved what you said to be demonstrably false every single time without exception.
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires, and will turn away their ears from the truth and will turn aside to myths.
1 Timothy 1:3-4
As I urged you upon my departure for Macedonia, remain on at Ephesus so that you may instruct certain men not to teach strange doctrines, nor to pay attention to myths and endless genealogies, which give rise to mere speculation rather than furthering the administration of God which is by faith.
Charles Darwin, 1859. βTo suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.β
rejection.
βYet reason tells me that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possessor, can be shown to exist; if further, the eye does vary ever so slightly, and the variations be inherited, which is certainly the case; and if any variation or modification in the organ be ever useful to an animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, can hardly be considered real.β
Whenever you talk about fossils to support darwinism you make me sick. The fossils discovered by george cuvier a paleontologist who strongly oppose darwinism has nothing in it to back darwinism. A guru in darwinism a few months ago told me they are still looking for fossils in the sea to back darwinism.
Quantumhead have you them? is that what you are refering to?
I have never said anything in the bible is allergory unless the bible says so. Tell me what prophecies were twisted.
I speak in tongues and no one taught me. If i am mentally ill and you comprehend my communication we are of the same feather.
More proof of christianity; read all about the Azuza street conference.
Whenever you talk about fossils to support darwinism you make me sick.
Wow.
Darwin rejects his own theory
He didn't, but that is entirely inconsequential, because the fact is his theory is correct. The eye is not irreducibly complex, because many creatures in nature have more primitive versions of it. The human eye itself is a more primitive version if compared to certain other creatures. The human eye, like everything else in biology, has evolved. It didn't arrive fully formed on a magic carpet.
Furthermore, the irreducible complexity argument is stupid in the first place. I can't remember who, but someone once compared it to the probability of a Boeing 747 suddenly assembling itself from scratch in your local scrapyard.
He didn't, but that is entirely inconsequential, because the fact is his theory is correct.
oh come on! whenever was it observed? Any half fish half crocodile fossils? Or recent lab experiment????
he human eye, like everything else in biology, has evolved. It didn't arrive fully formed on a magic carpet.
Are you saying over years? Ok proof? Maybe we can visit your grandpa's grave and ask him to direct us to his grandpa's graveyard so we get his eye ball for some lab tests.
I am guessing....and I had to actually look it up but I'm GUESSING he means Isaiah 11:11-12:
And it shall come to pass in that day, that the Lord shall set his hand again the second time to recover the remnant of his people, which shall be left, from Assyria, and from Egypt, and from Pathros, and from Cush, and from Elam, and from Shinar, and from Hamath, and from the islands of the sea.
This is a total guess as I think people are thinking that to gather from all locations in a day would take a plane but that is a gross over-reach in my opinion.
Says the guy who agrees with himself 8 to 10 times using alt accounts on nearly every posting
So the liar who already got caught in one lie bounces straight to the next lie without even taking a breath?
Lol. You are a walking joke. You have no wit, you can barely speak your own language and you're intellectually retarded. It is little wonder that you're such a spectacularly dishonest little toad. If I were you I'd avoid the truth too.
Yes when caught do your usual transparent dance like the childish moron you are ; everyone knows about your all accounts you idiot .
If you were me you would avoid the truth ? You don't have to be me to avoid the truth you're spectacularly efficient at doing so with your 8 different C D personas
Your claim was not that I had alt accounts. Your claim was that I use alt accounts "to agree with myself 8-10 times every posting". Let me explain why you are changing your argument within the space of one post: You are a pathological liar who lacks a single iota of intelligence.
Incorrect again Tantrumhead I've made several claims regarding your alt accounts all claims have been correct ; yet again you dishonestly claim you don't have alt accounts and you seem to think you posses something others don't have as in intelligence , your ' intelligence ' is on a par with a seldom watered pot plant and that's stretching it πππ
Dermot, your constant wall of far right smear attacks are worth nothing. You are a pointless pathological liar who would be considered unintelligent by the standards set by most middle schools.
Tantrumhead ,your constant wall of far right smear attacks are worth nothing. You are a pointless pathological liar who would be considered unintelligent by the standards set by most middle schools.
Dermot, your constant wall of far right smear attacks are worth nothing. You are a pointless pathological liar who would be considered unintelligent by the standards set by most middle schools.
Says the guy who agrees with himself 8 to 10 times using alt accounts on nearly every posting
So the liar who already got caught in one lie bounces straight to the next lie without even taking a breath?
Lol. You are a walking joke. You have no wit, you can barely speak your own language and you're intellectually retarded. It is no wonder you're such a spectacularly dishonest little toad. If I were you I'd avoid the truth too.
You claim to believe in christ but have no knowledge about the bible.
Witchcraft lessons taking too much of your bible time right?
here is your help......
Isaiah 60:4-6
"Look and see, for everyone is coming home! Your sons are coming from distant lands; your little daughters will be carried home.
Your eyes will shine, and your heart will thrill with joy, for merchants from around the world will come to you. They will bring you the wealth of many lands."
(All these happened israel returned)
Now.
isaiah 60:8
King James Bible
Who are these that fly as a cloud, and as the doves to their windows?
It's always fascinating with how some people read into the bible. I'm not even saying that to be condescending, it's literally quite fascinating to see ten people read a book and nearly all of them come away with a different message if there isn't someone there telling them what to think.
Isn't it just , I remember reading there's over 30,000 different denominations of Christianity and they all disagree over certain passages in the bible and what they mean
LOL!! Are you sure you aren't a SaintNow dummy account?
isaiah 60:8
King James Bible
Who are these that fly as a cloud, and as the doves to their windows?
So you take that literally? Do you believe they actually meant the fluffy clouds in the sky?
Hebrews 12:1
Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles. And let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us
It's a metaphore that suggests speed as well as number. But hey, if you want to think it literally means airplane....go for it.
I was giving you an opportunity to once exhibit your intelligence. As usual proving the opposite. i hate to see you embarrass yourself. I won't stretch this any further.
"nerh"? That's a new one. The response though is reminiscent of my kids....."NUH UHHHH YOU ARE". Lol.
I read one of Jeffrey's posts last night in which he point blank denied Darwinian evolution. His "evidence" was that Darwin once puzzled over the implications of his own theory. Oh, and he finished up by saying the fossil record provides no substantiation. I have come to realise that madness like this is not to be argued with. It is to be quietly tiptoed away from.
I read one of Jeffrey's posts last night in which he point blank denied Darwinian evolution.
Welllll that's not entirely a position that is just his, ya know? There are plenty of religious people out there that don't believe in it.
His "evidence" was that Darwin once puzzled over the implications of his own theory.
That's hardly evidence but I think Darwin would have puzzled over the implications. Just like anyone putting forth a new idea into a world that was pretty set with creationism. Puzzling over the implications doesn't mean that he questioned his theory to the point of just putting it out there just to spite.
Oh, and he finished up by saying the fossil record provides no substantiation. I have come to realise that madness like this is not to be argued with. It is to be quietly tiptoed away from.
Yes.....science's greatest hoax.....people running around creating REALLY old bones and randomly burying them all over the world.... XD yeah that makes total sense, that theory does make me laugh.
I don't mind chatting with people who have different views even if I think they might have a touch of madness, sometimes they have interesting ideas but when they start going off on others for believing in something different then I lose interest or just start messing with them. :D I think we all have a touch of madness sometimes.
The bible is a book of mostly horseshit you should try reading it some time
Dermot knows all about horseshit because it's all he writes. He's a Cartman alt. You can tell by the fact that he doesn't debate anybody. He just attacks them, and usually with lies.
The bible is a book of mostly horseshit you should try reading it some time
Dermot knows all about horseshit because it's all he writes. He's a Cartman alt. You can tell by the fact that he doesn't debate anybody. He just attacks them, and usually with lies.
Denial again ? I guess it's your only option at least be man enough to admit your own rantings as in your support of Bin Laden and his ' testimony ' .
It is indeed a debating site and as you rightly say not a place for spiteful children to proliferate lies ; seeing as you feel so strongly about it maybe you should mend your ways and stop doing it ?
So Bin Laden was not involved in 9 / 11 and Bin Laden was involved in 9/11 and that your latest stance ?
The only person in this thread who has made any claims about bin Laden is you. If you want me to believe that bin Laden was involved in the 9/11 attacks, which you clearly do, then by all means show me some proof. Posting smiley faces and telling lies about me is proof of nothing except your own retardation.
From the mouth of your neo-Nazi hero, Vice President Cheney:-
We've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden [sic] was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming.
I said your neo-Nazi hero, not your neo-Nazi President. I suppose we can add basic reading comprehension to your ever-growing list of failures in life.
This doesn't even need to be about "science" per se. It's basically if you think something is true and then you see the knowledge repeated in a form of confirmation then it adds to your belief your knowledge was correct. Heck, the religious often claim validation in similar ways. Which is why if the religious automatically dismiss predictions science made and confirmed as bogus then the religious are being hypocrites.
Science also warned that the hurricane in Texas would hit a certain place and dump huge amounts of rain, causing most people to "get the hell out of Dodge", before they were killed! Science predicts more in a week than the Bible predicts in centuries ... and with FAR greater accuracy and detail. Not always 100% absolute, but always very close. I'm for more science, less mythology.
No it didn't. People created the computer I am on. Science is the study of something you dipshit. You'd think you'd get tired of me trashing your dumpster fire arguments, but alas, you like getting your ass stomped and looking like a retarded dumbass.
No it didn't. People created the computer I am on.
Omg, you are so dishonest and so stupid, bronto. It's impossible trying to describe to you how dishonest and how stupid you actually are. You said science didn't make anything happen. People on their own, without science, could not have made your computer. Hence, science made it happen. Or at least helped make it happen.
Your initial argument implied that God had created something, but since you have no proof of that we can assume your opinion to be as worthless as usual. Contradictorily, the benefits of science are REAL. Notice the difference between REAL and IMAGINARY.
Science "creates" CT-Scans, ex-ray, microscopes, life-saving drugs, ambulances with life-saving equipment, computers that make these things work, power supplies that give them the ability to work, studies that tell us why people are dying, new materials that allow us "creations" to build things we couldn't imagine a few years ago ... like space ships and satellites that let us find out more about OUR universe ... (haven't found heaven or the flying spaghetti monster yet .. still looking...). Atheists don't ignore ANY of these things OR the plague. We "create"! ;-)
When science is claimed to uphold belief in evolution or the big bang, that science is a hoax. There is no need in any field of science to believe in evolution or the big bang. Scientific accomplishment is only hindered by wasting time trying to support the big bang or evolution. Much more could be accomplished by phony scientists who are Hell-bent on clinging to the big bang and evolution, if they would quit wasting time trying to prove the impossible and spend that time actually conducting true scientific study and application.