Should I just start identifying random people as allies or hostiles
Is that how this works??
YES
Side Score: 5
|
NO
Side Score: 4
|
|
|
|
I take the opposite appraoch of Apollo. I accept all allies and ignore enemy requests just because when someone creates a debate they have that nifty "invite friends" so I don't have to scan CD for an argument I might want to go to. For enemies, like, disagreeing isn't exactly "enemy" material. Like if someone threw my turtle out a window or something they'd be an enemy, not if they type some words I disagree with on a the computer. But sure, random is fun too. Go for it. Side: YES
|
2
points
|