Can you replace the "8" in your argument with an asterisk so all of the bolding gets fixed?
Then how did we begin talking about whether or not guns should even be legal? Was it not you who claimed if suckers were illegal that people would still have suckers?
Wow, this is a misquote. My whole sentence was "We were talking about gun free zones, but you couldn't keep to that topic. " The answer was right there "but you couldn't keep to that topic." You're insane, no doubt. The debate was about whether there should be a ban on guns in special areas, so I guess we started talking about guns being legal from the first post dummy. But, you are the only one who mentioned taking away guns. You said this multiple times for no reason. So, WE never talked about whether guns should even be legal, it was all YOU as seen in my previous argument. Oh, and the part about suckers came after this, so sorry.
Show me one quote where i said gun free zones should be everywhere. I said can we keep the gun free zones we already have.
It is really funny, because you saying guns should be taken away is in my last post. The taking away of guns implies that the rules of gun free zones applies everywhere. "As I said before, no one is trying to take your guns." I never accused you of saying that, implying that, or wanting that. A gun free zone involves banning guns in that zone, that's what I was talking about.
if it's hard to follow, that is your own fault.
I said hard to follow, not impossible. And, I only meant hard for YOU. It was not that bad really. The reason it was hard was because you had to go back 2 posts to see what I originally said because you didn't discuss it the first time. What did you do when faced with a "difficult" challenge? You cried and complained instead of replying to what I wrote.
As I said before three words out of a whole sentence is not proper quoting.
You just misquoted yourself :) You said earlier that you also have to go off topic. I tried to keep my post smaller and only copied a few of your words, but apparently you need your entire post reshown so you can smell your own farts.
Yes, I got upset. Yet you went on a name calling, cursing bender.
After which I finally got you to have a real debate. You only respond to name calling and cursing. So, I guess it needs to continue.
Ironically, the topic of this debate is about if we should find our own mistakes when being told we're misquoting or not, yet you're talking about another debate where you feel you were wronged.
That's not irony. The irony is the person who says people should go back and look for their own mistakes had his mistake spelled out for him and refuses to believe it, thus proving that people don't know they are doing anything wrong and should be told where the mistake was.
Since you didn't address the fact that you misquoted me it is obvious that you agree that you are a misquoter. Why do you do it? Is it just to win? Everyone who misquotes is doing it deliberately, right? So, why do you misquote so much?
