CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
It's easy to say no so long as it isn't your own mother, wife, sister, or daughter who is facing probable death because something is wrong with their pregnancy. And if the pregnancy likely is already going to end in a damaged or dead baby then forcing the death of both that baby and the mother is simply a waste.
Prolifers have grown to become moderates, and so that the followers can not see the obvious journey to prochoice, they've been branding them as extreme antinatalists and labelled them "proabortion".
And before you spin that as most abortions aren't necessary, remember the topic of this debate up top is "should abortion be allowed for the health of the mother." The small number involved compared to the overall total abortion numbers would be an argument FOR this topic, not against it. Why stand in the way of the 2.8% who are facing death?
I believe abortion should be allowed for the health of the mother because a fetus in not considered alive even by medical terms. While I can see and understand the concerns of the other side, I strongly agree with the pro-choice side of the argument. If the fetus was indeed a live human being, I would be disagreeing right now. However, the fetus is not, in fact, a live human being that emits brain waves. By all medical terms, it is not alive.
A fetus is not considered alive even by medical terms so you say ! So how is it you came to be ? You were not considered alive until you exited the womb?
Nope. Women don't need to be saved by committing such sins, and they shouldn't be. You're blinded by anti-religion ideals, popularised around the Renaissance and the Enlightenment millenia later than Bible. I have Bible on my side.
You always have the right to do abortion, whether or not health is an issue.
You'll just have to burn in hell for an eternity for that.
I could paste all the quotes here, but they're about 400. It makes more sense that you read the quotes by clicking on the link. If you want to, read with all the context you prefer, or even the whole book, for some fanatics like to accuse us of putting things "out of context".
People whose morals derive from religious bullshit based on nothing but fairy-tales, hearsay and dogma, do not deserve to be treated seriously in a debate.
Really, is it the first time you're reading me? (That too, with a level of comprehension that'd disappoint me if you were a pigeon.)
Ah, I see that you're inactive and ignorant. Though I'm still disappointed... I would have, after all, expected you to be smarter than that.
Though for your specific arguments here, you ought to be dismissed. I'm hearing you merely because you've been reasonable in the past, even though I am not that big of a fan for induction everywhere.
Since you qualify as a spammer here, I won't care to reply any more. It isn't my debate, so I can not switch off your spam, and thus don't care to.
For a while, though, I thought that you were offended by me taking the name of your "shepherd", perhaps in vain (I don't care enough to see whether it qualifies).
So you either have to admit there is a contradiction or find a way to resolve the contradiction. Here is a way to resolve the contradiction. Christ rules over the church, so husbands ruling over their wives would be similar to Christ loving the church. Can you resolve the contradiction without husbands ruling over their wives?
