Should circumcising babies be illegal
Yes
Side Score: 60
|
No
Side Score: 44
|
|
|
|
5
points
5
points
1
point
5
points
It can cause diseases, but doesn't mean it will. It's meant to protect the developing penis. A religious reason is no better than a cosmetic reaso. Islamic people mutilate the clitoris of women, this is basically the same thing. Keeping the foreskin will do no harm in the majority of the population. Although some people do do it as a religious identifier, why not do it later in life? Give The guy the choice. It'd mean a lot more spiritually if he gets to make the conscience choice Side: Yes
1
point
1
point
Female genital mutiliation is not tolerated yet this is no different. It is a barbaric act and is damaging to the penis as it reduces sensation. Babies can't consent to it. I don't get why it's so common for Americans to do this to their kids when they're not even Jewish. Outside of America, with the exception of muslims, circumcision of Gentiles is virtually unheard of. Side: Yes
1
point
5
points
1
point
1
point
0
points
0
points
I understand that you're not educated and are a passionate gay and all who doesn't find women remotely attractive but to say that cutting off the clit (equivalent of the male penis head) and even the tabula too (equivalent of the skin at the base of the head just under the foreskin) is the same as male circumcision is to not comprehend science. :) Side: No
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
There is NO moral excuse for cutting up a baby's penis/vagina. It's not your body. I honestly get sick when I think about it being legal and actually happening. I'm afraid of thinking about the screams of the baby and how the child will feel later on in life. Good thing it's legal to sue your parents for it later. Side: Yes
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
|
5
points
5
points
5
points
1
point
1
point
5
points
3
points
1
point
1
point
1
point
5
points
1
point
|