Should congress provide oversight on Trump, or are they just pissed that Trump won?
Constitution says OVERSIGHT
Side Score: 9
|
Dem Dems is COMMIES
Side Score: 8
|
|
|
|
The Congress should provide ACTUAL oversight no matter WHO is POTUS. I don't think we're "pissed that Trump won". I think we're pissed at what he did AFTER he won! Things like: Tax cuts promised for the middle class, and given VERY largely to the already rich! Promises to protect SS and Medicare and LGBTQ, and DAKAs and women's rights and equality, and stop the school and religious massacres, and bring "law and order to Chicago", and be "too busy" to be on the phone and watch TV all the time …. not to mention "to busy to play golf", and the "transparent government", and the "drain the swamp" thingy, and, and, and...…. "Promises made" , promises forgotten! I suppose I SHOULD talk about dumping our allies and exchanging them for enemies, but, THAT would make U.S. REALLY pissed off! (I don't like to start trouble ….;-) Side: Constitution says OVERSIGHT
They should provide oversight, regardless of whether or not they are pissed at his victory. But that's not what they are doing. Instead Congress is spreading weird conspiracy theories about Trump. And failing to address actual corruption on his part. I think there is a pattern here. Side: Constitution says OVERSIGHT
1
point
|
1
point
I'm all for climbing all over Trump if they dig into all of Obama's Presidency and pre Presidency first. Then we'll need to be ready to investigate the next Democrat in a full anal probe. I think full investigations of all future Presidents helps the right. The Communist Control Act wil be quite a bitch for the left. Side: Dem Dems is COMMIES
1
point
1
point
0
points
|