CreateDebate


Debate Info

9
23
Yes No
Debate Score:32
Arguments:24
Total Votes:43
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (8)
 
 No (16)

Debate Creator

christjesus(318) pic



Should fags be excluded from the army?

Yes

Side Score: 9
VS.

No

Side Score: 23

Should fags be excluded from the army?

Yes, because fags will rape all male soldiers and that is disgusting.

Furthermore, fags are cowards so they will kill their fellow soldiers.

Side: yes
Abbott(162) Disputed
1 point

YOUR A BASTURD

Yes, because fags will rape all male soldiers and that is disgusting.

WHAT FUCKING PROF DO U HAVE MR ASS WIPE NOT ALL GAY PEOPLE HAVE GAY SEX MOST OF THE TIME THEY DON'T HAVE ANY SEX AT ALL!

Furthermore, fags are cowards so they will kill their fellow soldiers.

LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT THEY ARE BRAVE ENOUGH TO RAPE THEM THEN BRAVE ENOUGH TO KILL THEM BUT THEY ARE COWARDS... MAKES REAAAALLY GOOD SINCE DOESN'T IT YOU SHOULD REALLY THINK HARD BE 4 TYPING RANDOM WORDS OK DUMMY!

Side: YOU ARE GOING TO HELL STRAIGHT TO HELL
christjesus(318) Disputed
1 point

WHAT FUCKING PROF DO U HAVE MR ASS WIPE NOT ALL GAY PEOPLE HAVE GAY SEX MOST OF THE TIME THEY DON'T HAVE ANY SEX AT ALL!

I don't have any prof.

Side: yes
davidthefag(3) Disputed
1 point

me and my friends think that you americans are real dumbasses,i have a really gay friend his name is david and he would never rape a soldier

Side: yes
xVDeathWishV(23) Disputed
1 point

What are you basing off all these statements off of? your obvious fears of homosexuals? Why don't you just kill yourself and stop insulting the lives of men and women who everyday risk their lives for your sorry ass. That way if they died it wouldn't be for a piece of shit like you.

Side: No
davidthefag(3) Disputed
1 point

Scientific surveys have proved that homosexuals are preoccupied with sex more than normal people, and that the thought of penetrating the anuses of young males obsesses them to the exclusion of all else.

Side: yes
3 points

First, it's clear you made this debate then were the only one to comment, mostly likely because you didn't want to debate: You had already made up your mind on this issue. Second, HOMOSEXUALS should be allowed to serve.

Allowing Homosexuals to serve hasn't hurt the militaries of France, UK, Germany, Austria, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, Columbia, Ireland, Italy, South Africa, Israel, or Russia. Some of those countries, like Russia and Israel, have seen combat since legally allowing Homosexuals to serve, and haven't reported it as an issue.

Furthermore, when the UK was considering banning Homosexuals from their military, they found that it would lower moral on the troops, and would expose the country to bribery from other nations spies (If you could lose your job by being outed as a Homosexual, you'd probably give the spies what they want, whether its true or not)

Side: No
2 points

This is straight up crossing the line. Even your wording of your argument makes me want to punch you in the face. For the record, anyone in the military is 1000 times better of a person than you will ever be, gay or not, and I truly hope you meet a homosexual person one day who gives you the beating of a lifetime and puts your sorry ass in line.

Side: No
1 point

AMEN TO THAT MAN this guy is an ass hole about every thing im pretty sure he's racist too wtf is ur problem CJ like realy grow someballs and get over urself and u just got told bye a 13 yr old bitch!

Side: YOU ARE GOING TO HELL STRAIGHT TO HELL
2 points

For the last time. We are not in a different old century. Your sexuality is never a concern. First it was Women... Now it's the Gay community. Leave them Alone! What is their crime? At least they are much better than the million others who do things worse. Why are there certain people interested in something that's not Important.

Side: No

Using the word 'fag' in the title instead of 'homosexual' just implies how much of a twat you are being, and you clearly don't give a damn about anyone else's opinion anyway.

Side: No
1 point

First of all I'm going to ignore the deragotary term 'fags'. Clearly you haven't had enough education to learn that the correct term is homosexuals. Second, you clearly don't have enough hobbies to occupy your time if you have to ask this idiotic question. Homosexuals should not be excluded from the army because (and this is obvious) they add more fire power to your army. Just because you're a man and you like other men does not mean you have to be excluded from war. And by the way, if you were looking at a gun aimed at your head, I'm sure you wouldn't care who saved your idiotic bum.

Side: No
0 points

i wish on the death of all straight people of the planet so i can fuck all the men i want without any complaints of my neighbours.also i fuck my neighbours husband,hes gay wife doesnt know.

Side: No
ikillgaysffs(2) Disputed Banned
1 point

we have a fkin retarded teacher in my school and she eats children for lunch and i am hard when gay people fall in holes and die miserably . DIE AMERICA!

Side: yes
Abbott(162) Disputed
1 point

WHT THE HELL IM GLAD UR BANNED BITCH UR A FAGGOT AS RETARD (i dont mean faggot in the ways every one else does)

Side: No
Abbott(162) Disputed
1 point

what the fuck is ur problem and why wernt u banned! realy u need help

Side: YOU ARE GOING TO HELL STRAIGHT TO HELL