CreateDebate


Debate Info

11
2
Hmmm...Why not? No.. of course not!
Debate Score:13
Arguments:11
Total Votes:18
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Hmmm...Why not? (9)
 
 No.. of course not! (2)

Debate Creator

Peace214(101) pic



Should human population growth be reduced?

In the recent years human population has risen and this has led to many ill-effects and benefits too. What do you think? 

Hmmm...Why not?

Side Score: 11
VS.

No.. of course not!

Side Score: 2
2 points

There's something very astonishing population levels must be lowered to better the atmosphere of the planet,and people should go more for adoption

Side: Hmmm...Why not?
AndyDylWyk(40) Disputed
1 point

You should go for adoption pro-choice everytime I hear your comments it seems to be copy-book stuff and now you guess who am I?

Side: No.. of course not!
Cartman(18192) Disputed
2 points

You can stop arguing with yourself. It is getting ridiculous.

Side: Hmmm...Why not?
1 point

Nothing to worry about here. We're heading in the right direction for self inflicted total annihilation. When we've finally ''gone and done it'' I'm not sure what species of creature will pick up the evolutionary baton, perhaps the clever, well organised ants.

Side: Hmmm...Why not?
1 point

Its not a secret that humans negatively impact the planet resource wise. Also how we are destroying the environment. Now maybe we dont need to reduce the population but we can install a system of limiting population growth. I dont know if it work like chinas but a global golden rule should be applied so that we put limits to how many children a person can have aswell as what is the minimum age to have a child(to avoid early pregnancies so we dont speed up the process of mating, so we drag out the life cycle and not speed up reproduction). If we limit how many children as well as how old a person needs to be before having a child, maybe we can freeze the population so for every 1 death, 1 birth occurs or close to it. And well still eventually cause the meltdown of the earth if we stay at same population but maybe we just freeze pop until we find unlimited renewable energy and how to save/replenish ozone layer.

Side: Hmmm...Why not?
1 point

Yes. At least in India. People should have only two children: one girl and another boy. In many families people continue reproducing. This is the familiar in the case of slums. They think more people in a family would account for more jobs and hence money.

Side: Hmmm...Why not?
1 point

It certainly worked for China... in the short term.

Now they are facing Baby Boom Retirement x100.

Side: Hmmm...Why not?
1 point

Humans have affected the environment in many ways. And its not a secret either that whenever humans in the past have found land the number of species somehow reduced. So is the incidence of the dodo bird .....human population need to be reduced or controlled

to conserve the environment. And also to conserve the resources for the future generation.

Side: Hmmm...Why not?

I think in an over-populated country like China that human population growth needs to be reduced.

Side: Hmmm...Why not?
-1 points

Humans are smart enough to get by using less resources. We just need to go renewable, not reduce population.

Side: No.. of course not!