You are supposed to work until the day you die. Get with the program. That's the way it has always been and the way it will always be until the day you die. Have a nice day ;)

We cannot co-exist as well as we do without dedicating time to society... that is work. When you go for 160 hours, to do something that you don't like doing, you are just doing your part for society, and feeding yourself. You obviously have a computer and no means of creating one from scratch, and yet you don't realize that the computer, the internet, the electricity that it uses, all steams from hours of someone's time... more like, everything that you do on a daily basis is only possible because of millions and millions and MILLIONS of hours of labor... and here you are complaining about it via all of this advanced technology.

Don't be an idiot.

P.S. there are only 168 hours in a seven day period... if you're working 160+ hours a week, you're not sleeping or showering, or eating much... or pooping.

Certainly they should and they must. They are the tools by which business is run every day in the world. I presume you term people as tools meaning workers and not oxen in the field. But that's how it works...you work and you get underpaid most times.

Your debate is incomprehensible. Please, please, please spellcheck and proofread first! I have only the vaguest idea of what you're trying to say, and it's frustrating.

Well thats just like your opinion man....-10 internets too Xander.

Vedic Sandskrit is my first language....btw...

Anyways you kinad missed the point of the conversation...all points are moot and those correcting grammar whilst agreeing and hippocritic...check out the star map Hippocittio...first look it seems pretty empty...untill you get a good look at it...then its vastly over populated..l0l0l0l...just check it out..also...Socialism dosen't fail...get used too it.

Should they be allowed? Of course. If I get the gist of what you typed, you are asking a simple question. Should a person remain employed doing a job that does not satisfy their health requirements? The simple answer is no. The greater good is not served as well if people do not habitually attempt to improve their situation.

"Fear's voice is too loud while hope's is too quiet" ~atypican