CreateDebate


Debate Info

50
59
Ban them Allow free speech
Debate Score:109
Arguments:91
Total Votes:119
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Ban them (40)
 
 Allow free speech (40)

Debate Creator

Grenache(6053) pic



Should members be banned from debates for disagreeing

I'm proud to say I got banned from further comment on my first debate.  Yet it seems to me on this site you merely need vote against someone's debate to get banned.  It doesn't require actual bad behavior, like cussing, making threats, or pulling dirty tricks.  All it takes is for the affirmative to have a fit.  How is that debate?

Ban them

Side Score: 50
VS.

Allow free speech

Side Score: 59
2 points

They should be banned when they refuse to discuss the OP and do nothing but whine about how they don't like the framing of the thoughts, and then continuously insult the originator. Sometimes you have to wonder if people smoked pot since they were twelve and never grew up.

Side: Ban them
Cartman(18192) Disputed
5 points

You ban people for discussing the OP faster than you can handle.

Side: Allow free speech
Grenache(6053) Disputed
1 point

A competent debater does not need censorship. Regardless, now I know how you and this site operate, so here is how it is going to be. I will state my argument at least once with the alert I will likely be blocked. So you will still hear from me even though you try to silence me. I will be fair, and polite, though you will accuse me of not being so. I will point out hypocrisy, arrogance, vindictiveness, childishness, contradictions, flaws, sources, and censorship. And eventually you may wish you had acted more like the Saint you portend to be.

Side: Allow free speech
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

And eventually you may wish you had acted more like the Saint you portend to be.

Grammar check here, genius of collegiate accomplishment; the correct word is "pretend". You're welcome, no charge for that/

Side: Ban them
parkerwil101(4) Disputed
1 point

Your answer does not seem fit the argument title. Disagreement is what a debate is! Without disagreement, there is not debate.

Side: Allow free speech
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

How can I disagree when you say disagreement is what a debate is? Without disagreement, there is no debate. Hat's off, I concede you are a genius, a gentleman and a scholar, and I would not be the least bit surprised to hear that you are in fact a rocket scientist.

Side: Ban them
2 points

Don't feel bad, most people get banned from my debates a lot quicker than you did. At least you were able to refrain from using outright profanity when you incessantly insulted me. I tolerated your posts because you were not using vulgarity in your insults, but when you just went on and on and on with the mudslinging, refusing my efforts to get you to discuss the subject, you got hit where the Lord split ya.

Even Pro Logos didn't get banned in that one, as he made constructive comments. That's all I want, constructive comments, not cry babies and foul mouth perverts.

Side: Ban them
2 points

Thank you for the mention. I am honored.

Side: Ban them
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
2 points

Well I honestly appreciated your constructive comments, however brief they were.

Side: Allow free speech
Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

You are so fucking stupid you hate "vulgarities" in abbreviations. WTF?

Side: Allow free speech
2 points

I think you're trying too hard. But it's a good effort. :)

Side: Allow free speech
Grenache(6053) Disputed
1 point

Oh I don't feel bad. I have a long history in this. I debated competitively through three years of high school and four years of college, and have hung around several other debate websites for quite a long time. You and I will work this out. We have much to discuss for years to come. And when I counter your audacity what you dismiss as personal attacks will be seen by all others as just really good counter arguments which you ignore and block. Goodnight.

Side: Allow free speech
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

All you did was insult me. When you act like that, I'm going to ban you, and if you complain about being banned after you deliver a paragraph or two of nothing but insults, I'll say you are a crybaby jerk and need God's mercy to be saved from Hell.

All you did was insult me. You can go and read many constructive comments on both sides in that discussion, and many of them were in opposition to me. Compare them to your comments and yours were nothing but insults. I tolerated you to allow more than one post only because I thought you might contribute something constructive but all you did was add more complaints and insults. This is what our colleges are producing now? No wonder the world is going bonkers.

Your education does not impress me for two cents, waving it around like a flag you expect me to salute. Just stay on topic and quit with the insults. If you "object" to how I frame my discussions, and you won't participate in response to the OP and only want to go out on wild tangents justifying yourself by insulting me and telling me how great you are in education and experience.. you can expect the boot, son.

Side: Ban them
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

I"m going to Heaven and you are still in your sins, dying. We do not know if we have even one more day to discuss things as the way you stand now, if you die today, your sins are not forgiven and you are not going to heaven......I make no assumptions about having time in the future to do anything. If I die before I can make another post, I received justice but in God' mercy I have eternal life in the resurrected Savior.

If you want to be sure you can have long conversations with me in the future, you have to be sure your sins are forgiven and you are going to heaven, and my guess is that you are too stinking proud to admit you are a sinner who deserves to die and burn in Hell so you won't know God's mercy.

Side: Ban them

I gave you a number of chances to actually address the topic of my debates and you spend all your time spewing nonsense. I told you i willl not waste my time with children acting childish.

Side: Ban them
1 point

Sure. I do it all the time.

Side: Ban them
-1 points

It's not simply dissagreeing that a person should get banned for. It is outright deception, lies, vulgarity, childish behavior. It's up to the creator's decision what deserves being banned.

If a person bans for no reason, the same will happen to him, so people should be careful.

Side: Ban them
Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

You think it is childish to support liberals.

Side: Allow free speech
Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

I don't think it's childish to support liberals, I think it is either stupid or devious...or both.

Side: Ban them
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
-3 points
1 point

You seem to think that everyone has those type of trait but in reality, They really dont and you just need a blog topic.

Side: Allow free speech
1 point

No, it is simply disagreeing. You just call that disagreeing "outright deception, lies, vulgarity, childish behavior" etc.

You really need to get to a point where you can figure that out. Honestly, the world isn't all out to get you, and it isn't inhabited by a bunch of evil deceivers. That sort of paranoia is not healthy.

Side: Allow free speech
Grenache(6053) Disputed
1 point

In real world debate in law and politics it is not the instigator of the argument who gets to decide validity of response but instead either the listening public, or whole legislature, or an independent judge in the courtroom. Your ban disagreements style is an artificial form of debate which is incomplete, biased, and one sided. And declaring what opponents say is lies is an artificial justification for shutting down further discussion.

Side: Allow free speech
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with banning liars. There is no debate when people are lieing because no matter what you say, they simply deny it no matter how true it is.

You can spew the same lies as everyone else how people are banning others for simply dissagreeing. NOT TRUE! In my case, I ban those who are deceptive and refuse to address the actual points of the argument, as well as vulgarity, childishness, etc.

Side: Ban them
5 points

It is technically not a debate unless you allow people to disagree.

Side: Allow free speech
Grenache(6053) Clarified
1 point

Hmm, I'm considering banning you for that. Why did you have to go all "technical" on me?

Oh wait, no I'm not. Because I'm not a dingbat. Thanks for your comment, Cartman.

Side: Ban them
ProLogos(2794) Disputed
1 point

Because I'm not a dingbat.

To say otherwise, would be an insult to dingbats.

Side: Ban them

I guess Fromwithin doesn't know what a debate is.

Side: Allow free speech
1 point

True. Even if he allowed dissenting opinion, you will find that pretty much all of his debates are just him complaining.

Side: Allow free speech
1 point

Anyone who disagrees with my viewpoints should not only be banned from a particular thread, but denied access to the Forum permanently.

Side: Allow free speech