CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:11
Arguments:8
Total Votes:11
Ended:06/29/17
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Should older people get better treatment from society? (6)

Debate Creator

kec123(8) pic



This debate has ended. You can no longer add arguments or vote in this debate.

Should older people get better treatment from society?

Research purposes - Many older people are ignored by society, just for their age. Furthermore older people get often lonely, because their families and friends do not spend time enough with them. when they go outside, it often the case that youngsters do not respect them or help them enough. tell me your opinnion.
Add New Argument
3 points

Oh absolutely. Between the cost of medical expenses and the amount of money it takes to keep them in assisted living facilities, many families can't help support their elder member. Many still aren't there for them for one reason or another so sadly the elder is alone a good portion of the time. I think as a society, we've pushed them aside to be forgotten, treated them as if they have no more use for us and acted like they are more a burden then blessing. And that should not be. Many of them have knowledge that will be lost when they are gone. They've lived our history.

In many cultures, caring for older members isn't even a second thought, it's a given and I think those societies are richer for it.

2 points

Yes of course they should , they have played their part and are entitled to live out their lives in peace and contentment

2 points

This is absolutely true. But if it's any consolation, society is pretty thorough about sticking it to every group in one way or another - with the sole exception of the upper 1 percenters who merely THINK they're getting rooked when taxes make them only buy 3 new megaproperties instead of 5. It's true an older person may have a hard time finding a job, might get teased or disrespected, might be targeted to be robbed, all that. And yet most of the rest of society still goes through those things, too.

outlaw60(15368) Clarified
1 point

At one point in the town hall, broadcast from the East Room by ABC news, a woman named Jane Sturm told the story of her 105-year-old mother, who, at 100, was told by an arrhythmia specialist that she was too old for a pacemaker. She ended up getting a second option, and the operation, for which Ms. Sturm credits her survival. "Look, the first thing for all of us to understand that is we actually have some -- some choices to make about how we want to deal with our own end-of-life care," Mr. Obama replied. After discussing ways "we as a culture and as a society [can start] to make better decisions within our own families and for ourselves," he continued that in general "at least we can let doctors know and your mom know that, you know what? Maybe this isn't going to help. Maybe you're better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller."

Boston Boy can you believe your Boy Obama said such a thing ?

Grenache(6053) Disputed
1 point

Ahemmm, Republicans look to slash funding for her age range. This is real, this is already confirmed. In your scenario she doesn't even get to talk about a choice, she just automatically gets cut down to squat.

2 points

Well, I guess I would be considered an "older person" (80). In my lifetime I've worked for 3 companies, never been fired, rarely worked a 40 hour week for any of them ... usually 56hrs or more. 40hrs seemed like "short time". I've applied for unemployment twice (temporary, forced), once I was layed off for two weeks, ended up 3 days, once for an indefinate period, ended up 6 days. I've never taken anything from the Gov that I didn't pay my fair share for. That's what "lazy liberals" do, except for a small % of deadbeats! (many of which are conservatives, like my rich Bro-in-law)! I worked 5 more years after I was "retired" by company policy. I raised two daughters of my own and two of my wifes. I was disgusted to hear a relative say, after working 40 hrs for the first time that it was too much! (He's nearly 30, and a Trump guy). I think I deserve to be guaranteed health care by the government that I've paid taxes to for over 60 years, and every other American should be able to rely on his/her government also, when they have supported it when they were able.

If corporations are "people", THEY should support our gov't, not try to screw it out of tax money or outsource jobs. They should get support when they NEED it and support their WORKERS when THEY need it! That's how you "make America great again", not give CEO's a $7,000,000 yacht in appreciation for paying as little tax as possible! Often "0"!

outlaw60(15368) Clarified
1 point

So Crazy AL worked for 3 companies were those corporations AL ? Now you stepped in it so corporations are not people but are companies people being you worked for 3 of them?

1 point

Hello k:

Yes, we should treat older people better... Duh....................

excon