I meant the idea of a question. Any question.

That's not quite a full answer.

Learning should be placed as the need that questioning answers.

It doesn't justify it. Just like Hitler can't justify the killing of all those people by saying that it brings the human race to a more pure state.

I probably should add that when I refer the learning ability as a need, I mean the real deal, being positive about the shape of the earth, being epistemologically certain that the sun doesn't orbit the earth. Hitler's example is just the one that gurgles up first, in his case the need is self purification, the answer comes with the extermination of the polluting virus. Obviously if he was to present his plan instead of his genius propaganda, the puring thing wouldn't even justify his mustache.

Plus, not all questions have the learning merit as a support, much of the questions asked could be acquired by experience, much of them make our lazy lives easier, and I wouldn't like to mark those with the testing interest in their backgrounds, not at this point - too knotty, gets the lines all blurry.

Maybe I didn't set the question right, maybe a better question would be whether the lies one might put himself into by making up answers would be worse than the certainly part-truths one might unknowingly dive into by accepting the answers of another.