Debate Info

install flash for graphs
No leave them alone Yes arrest those shitheads!
Debate Score:80
Arguments:49
Total Votes:92
Show More Stats

Argument Tags

side graph
 
 No that would be stupid! (19)
 
 Yes that is child pornography! (18)
 
 No leave them alone (14)

Debate Creator

SlashinatorX(375) pic



Should sexting between teen couples be illegal?

In case you didn't know sexting means sending naked pictures of yourself to another person.

In America sexting between underage couples is illegal because that is considered child pornography.  


No leave them alone

Side Score: 39
VS.

Yes arrest those shitheads!

Side Score: 41
Vote Up Vote Down
6 points

blah,

what are you going to do?

Making it illegal won't stop it, it will just label a bunch of kids texting eachother as pedophiles for the rest of their life.

Is a 14 year old who gets a picture of his 14 year old girlfriend's boobies in a message a child pornographer?

Should they have to divulge that they are a "sexual predator" to every potential employer and never get a job?

Should flyers be handed out in every neighborhood they ever live in saying "this guy (insert their picture) is a convicted sex offender"?

Should they be victims of hate crimes against them by people who don't know why they were labeled a sex offender for the rest of their lives?

All because they had an effing girlfriend when they were 14?

Of course not. It would be dumb. Unfortunately the field of lower education attracts dumb people a lot of the time, and this is what some school administrators are turning it into.

89 days ago | Tagged As: No that would be stupid!
Vote Up Vote Down
4 points

I honestly don't know why we're making sex and nudity so forbidden in the first place.

It's natural =\

Oh, wait. That's right. We try to avoid that.

21 days ago | Tagged As: No that would be stupid!
- SlashinatorX(375) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Wait why are we hostiles then?

We agree on this

The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.

15 days ago | Tagged As: No leave them alone
- Warlin(495) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

I actually removed you as an enemy after I saw a couple of arguments you made awhile back.

15 days ago | Tagged As: No leave them alone
- jtopolnak(124) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

You crack me up I gave you an upvote for this comment. So I have to type some more to get the 50 required.

15 days ago | Tagged As: No leave them alone

This is silly. The purpose of outlawing child pornography was to keep children safe from those who would take advantage of them. When two tweens are sexting, are they taking advantage of each other? I think not.

Besides, I think that minors (at a certain age) should be given more control over their bodies. For example, as an aspiring artist/photographer, I take a lot of nude/semi-nude self-portraits that I'm not allowed to show anyone because of my age. Bullshit.

85 days ago | Tagged As: No that would be stupid!
- SlashinatorX(375) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Exactly the adults think they are "protecting" them by making it illegal for them to work in porn.

But what we need protection from is those religious assholes who want to put everybody in prison for their sexual views.

83 days ago | Tagged As: No that would be stupid!
- kamranw(89) Disputed Banned
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Do you really think swearing proves your point? They ARE protecting them. A minor must live under different rules that an adult. They have a different maturity level and as someone already pointed out, they are still growing until 21. I would be very curious to see the age of most people arguing this is OK.

18 days ago | Tagged As: Yes arrest them!
- jtopolnak(124) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

I know we disagree with the religion thing. I disagree with those religious assholes too even though I may be one myself I don't believe in making any laws against it only because it takes away from personal freedom and gives the man that much more control over you. Also glad to finally see that USA waking up and realizes pot is not all that bad and decriminalizing that. Not all believers are hardcore and want to clamp down. It's actually more the Mormons like Orrin Hatch Senator from Utah that guy says if he catches you with one roach he wants to lock you up and throw away the key. i mean that's not religion that's Stalin.

15 days ago | Tagged As: No leave them alone
- kamranw(89) Disputed Banned
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

It IS child pornography and it IS to protect them. How many people who are dating at 14, are dating a year later? So who is going to stop them from spreading those pics? What do you do when it ends up in the wrong hands?

14 days ago | Tagged As: Yes arrest those shitheads!
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Yeah good work! good job protecting the children by putting them in prison for the rest of their lives & having them labeled as sex offenders.

there are alot of teens who date for years.

13 days ago | Tagged As: No leave them alone
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Sexting is actually just written phonesex.

The sending of photos does not have to occur concurrently.

So, no, sexting itself should not be illegal. But child pornography is illegal.

89 days ago | Tagged As: No that would be stupid!
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Teens will be teens, and will be stupid. Sexual texting shouldn't be illegal, though perhaps showing around picture should be. Like, it would be okay to get a naked picture of your girlfriend, but not okay to forward it to your whole phonebook. Also, I think that someone over twenty-one shouldn't have a photo of someone under eighteen- like they aren't allowed to have sex with someone under eighteen. I think this would prevent it from becoming true child pornography.

89 days ago | Tagged As: No that would be stupid!
- aordwaya(4) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

I agree.

Why can we not use common sence? If a 40 year old man has pictures of a naked 16 year old then yes its illegal. If a 16 year old boy has pictures of a 16year old girl who he is dating then this does NOT even fall into the same catagory. I am not saying its right for a 16 year old to send naked pictures of herself to anyone. I am a mother of a 13 year old and I will make her life a living @#$& if I find out she did this.

Children need guidance from their parents about responsible behavior. They need to know what is exspected of them and how bad choices can bring big problems. And if they dont want to listen then we need to let them fail to help them learn to make better ones as they grow older. Its called consiquesnces.

Some people in our society wants to make a law for everything now. Our children wont have to think for themselves by the time they are adults because the governement will have it all layed out for them. We wont need morals or self choice because there will be only one way. There are places the governement does not belong. Rainsing children is the biggest one. They are more and more involved and our children grow more and more disrespectful and defiant.

85 days ago | Tagged As: No that would be stupid!
- kamranw(89) Disputed Banned
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

If you allow the distribution amongst friends, how do you stop it from getting into a 40 year old's hands? Stop it from the roots. No pictures taken or sent, no predators getting their hands on them.

19 days ago | Tagged As: Yes arrest them!
Vote Up Vote Down
0 points

i think it's sick. But as sick as it may be it's still 1st ammendment rights. Last thing you want is government to make a law against it telling you can't take pictures of yourself naked it's your own right if you want to. Once they do that then what else you don't want to give big brother anymore control than you have to.

15 days ago | Tagged As: No leave them alone
- kamranw(89) Disputed Banned
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Taking the pic is not the illegal part. It is passing it on to someone else that is illegal underage.

14 days ago | Tagged As: Yes arrest those shitheads!
- jtopolnak(124) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

If both are teens and are close in age there is no crime. Yes if it somehow gets passed on to an adult that would be a problem and how and why an adult has it would be investigated to pursue criminal charges i agree but just for the argument sake the debate it purely only relating to teens so to the debate issue no laws should be made for sexting.

14 days ago | Tagged As: Yes arrest those shitheads!
Vote Up Vote Down
3 points

It technically is child pornography. If they need to see each other naked that badly, why the hell can't they just do it in person? It's a lot more fun that way anyway, or so I've heard. (still a virgin. :D)

89 days ago | Tagged As: Yes that is child pornography!
- xander(384) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Really! I mean, is it really all that difficult to be erotic in person?

87 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Well if they were erotic in person that is still illegal because they are under the age of consent.

So either way they will go to prison & be labeled as sex offenders.

19 days ago | Tagged As: No leave them alone
Vote Up Vote Down
-1 points

Who cares if it is still child pornography?! but why should it be illegal? its their phones

What if they can't meet each other in person?

89 days ago | Tagged As: No that would be stupid!
- MKIced(1756) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
3 points

I wish it could just be on their phones, but teenagers are stupid- I would know. I just graduated from high school. It becomes child porn as soon as anybody else looks at it, especially above 18. I had a friend who was sent a naked pic and he took out his phone in the lab and showed me! I mean, it was a nice picture and all, but I could see even better online. And if they can't meet each other in person then they should just wait. I know teenagers are horny as hell, but that's why God invented masturbation- and then the silly Christians (I'm a non-silly Christian) decided it was "wrong". ;)

89 days ago | Tagged As: Yes that is child pornography!

Depending on the age it would be considered child pornograpy but I would hope that they would keep it right there instead of meeting. If they meet then we have the issue of child molestation on one end, if not both. I also know teens are horny but that doesn't make it right that they distribute photos of themselves to anyone. God only knows where those pictures might end up and in whose mailbox!

88 days ago | Tagged As: Yes that is child pornography!
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

What if they are 14 or 16 & they can't meet each other in person?

Do they really deserve to be put in kid prison just for that?

They didn't intentionally do anything wrong.

88 days ago | Tagged As: No that would be stupid!
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

If a 14 and 16 year old don't know it's wrong to send nude photographs to each other I'd really hate to meet their parents. They should have been taught that it's wrong because it is child pornography, even if it is two underaged people who think they're "in love." Do you think the excuse that they're innocent of any intentional wrong doing is going to fly when and if they're parents find out what they've done?

85 days ago | Tagged As: Yes that is child pornography!
- kamranw(89) Disputed Banned
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

They did intentionally do something wrong. They sent a nude pic underage! Also, nobody here wants to put them in prison.

14 days ago | Tagged As: Yes arrest those shitheads!
- kamranw(89) Banned
Vote Up Vote Down
0 points

If they are sending pictures, it IS child pornography. Besides, how can you control those pictures from ending up in some freaks hands?

21 days ago | Tagged As: Yes that is child pornography!
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Who cares if it is technically child pornography?

It's their phone. Just leave them alone!

If it ends up in some freaks hands well anything can end up in their hands.

Just go after those freaks. Not the innocent children.

You are the same fascist so I'm not surprised you want every sinner to get arrested.

19 days ago | Tagged As: No leave them alone
- kamranw(89) Disputed Banned
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

"Just go after those freaks. Not the innocent children."

HAHAHA. So innocent people should have no accountability for their own actions? If THEY take the picture, and it ends up in some pedo's hands, this is in no way their fault? No wonder the youth today are so useless.

Secondly, if their just 'innocent children' as you call them, what business do they have taking such photos?

19 days ago | Tagged As: Yes arrest them!
Popular Debates: Gun-Rights Todays world cares too much about feelings Should people who are morally agaisnt abortions be forced to pay for those who w


bottomAd


About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Newsletter Archive
Sharing Tools
Invite Your Friends
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Basic Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
Creative Commons



©2009 CreateDebate, LLC All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.