This argument assumes everywhere does not include, personal property or the ability to look into personal property, but simply for pulic order. it also assumes local goverment service, eg coucil or police.

In the UK, goverment does not have access to public CCTV unless it falls in to the same category as those listed below for the individual.

Privacy only exists on personal property. Once you step onto Public property the Public deserve the right to know whats going on. In the same way an individual deserve to know what's going on, on their property.

How that information is used is up to debate, but if the law is to protect the public then they are entitled to monitor their property and inn the UK public cctvs are available to the public on request in the case of criminl or civil law.

So its not just Big Brother who is watching. It's the whole country!

I'm not sre how it works in the US or wheather the goverment has a much closer connnection with the law enforcement. But many times the goverment has been put in their place by the police here.

So basicly it should put cctv everywhere public but that doesn't give THEM untethered access, only public servants such as police and public order enforcers hace access.

On account of the advance of technology ,for the nonce , it is , inextricably , most of our privacy is being deprived of . Nonetheless , with some sacrifices made , we could bask in a multitude array of luxurious and unimaginable hightech gadgets .

Some may address that , it is unacceptable to let go our sacred region - privacy , trading for more soothing ambience . Since the birth of human race , knowledge is being accumulated from our ancestors toil . Despite of our reluctance , still , the path is being mimicked .

In a nutshell , should the spring of CCTV all around our neighbourhood can make some distinctive contribution to our safety and so forth devoid of our privacy intrusion , then , it is supportively for the Government to post CCTV .