CreateDebate


Debate Info

3
6
Yes No
Debate Score:9
Arguments:8
Total Votes:9
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (2)
 
 No (6)

Debate Creator

Cuaroc(8829) pic



Should the U.S. add photo warnings to cigarette packs?

Yes

Side Score: 3
VS.

No

Side Score: 6

Sure, the same day we get around to putting photo warnings on fast food and automobiles and the like. When the billboards for automalls display mangled corpses hanging out of wrecked car windows, you can put photo warnings on cigarette packs. When your McWhatever comes stamped with a gristly photo of some morbidly obese individual undergoing liposuction, sure, you can put photo warnings on cigarettes.

Personally I don't really want to go around being graphically shown all of the worst possible case scenarios for everything I do. I'm well aware cars can kill me; I don't need disgusting, regular warnings to remind me. I know fast food can lead to obesity and health complications; same deal, I don't need to be grossly reminded. Cigarettes, unlike the other two, already come with a warning to remind everyone of the obvious facts they already know - a photo warning, in this case, would be redundant overkill.

When the rest of the potentially dangerous behaviors (driving, eating, school sports, biking, etc.) catch up to cigarettes and have blunt label warnings and graphic photo warnings, sure, cigarettes can get equal treatment.

Side: Yes

Smoking is a individual health decision that the government has no authority in regulating cigarettes within the parameters of free speech.

Side: No
1 point

We tried that in Australia and it didn't work.

New tactic - strip all branding from the packaging and tax the hell out of them.

Side: No
2 points

They already to tax the hell out of them. In the US, anyways. And elsewhere.

And if we stripped all branding I think that would just confuse people - not stop them from feeding their habits and addictions. I smoke. How am I supposed to know what I'm buying if there isn't any branding? If there wasn't I would still buy cigarettes, I would just have no idea what cigarettes I'm buying because all the packages presumably look the same.

Side: Yes
1 point

To true but I think that we should keep the pictures just to help scare the crap out of them more, and possibly say something like "THIS WILL BE YOU!" or of the sort.

Side: No
shubbydoo(5) Disputed
1 point

People are already informed about the dangers of smoking, at least in the USA. Children are shown pictures of diseased lungs and the worst cases of smoking diseases. These images won't scare the crap out of them any more when they've already been exposed to them. Smokers choose to ignore what they already know.

Side: No
1 point

no, that is ridiculous. People buy what they want to pay for. The government should not mess with this consumer process in any way at all.

Side: No

Graphic photo warnings, in my opinion, are not going to stop smokers from purchasing cigarettes.

Side: No