Should war be prevented?
Wars have forced many countries to progress and innovate in history. Some say war keeps people possible to die or maltreated at any moment and war does many negative effects so war is bad. But "All creatures should live well" has never been a rule by Mother Nature; it's "The fittest ones live". Some people become depressed when facing disaster and can only motivate when encouraged, which should be eliminated. In natural world, creatures are forced to motivate because they will fall in disaster if they don't, so facing disaster is the main to cause motivation and innovation which is the human nature. It will become more apparent as the world develops and new things and conflicts emerge. This human nature cannot be enhanced in peace. So I think war should only be controlled, not prevented.
Yes.
Side Score: 1
|
 |
No.
Side Score: 0
|
|
|
|
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|
