CreateDebate


Debate Info

13
43
Yes (Sitara). No (Cuaroc).
Debate Score:56
Arguments:38
Total Votes:72
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (Sitara). (12)
 
 No (Cuaroc). (23)

Debate Creator

Sitar(3680) pic



Sitara versus Cuaroc: Can libertarians be prolife.

The rules of this debate are this: You can upvote, downvote, or reply to each comment, but save the comments section for Cuaroc and myself. The side with the most points wins, and results will be posted in 7 days. Good luck to everyone.

Yes (Sitara).

Side Score: 13
VS.

No (Cuaroc).

Side Score: 43
pakicetus(1455)
2 points

Remember when we had challenge debates? Yeah, me neither.

Side: Yes (Sitara).
Support Dispute Clarify
MKIced(2511)
1 point

Please stop making these debates. Can (someone who identifies as a political party) still be (something that goes against the party in general)? The answer is almost always yes.

Side: Yes (Sitara).
Support Dispute Clarify
Cuaroc(8829) Banned
3 points

someone seems to have forgotten about challenge debates.

Fact: libertarians cannot be prolife.

Side: No (Cuaroc).
Support Dispute Clarify
↑ Hide Replies
nobodyknows(745) Disputed
1 point

I believe the facts speak for themselves...

Fact: I am always right.

Fact: I say libertarians can be pro-life

Therefore,

Fact: Libertarians can be pro-life

Boom! Rock solid argument. I win

Side: Yes (Sitara).
Support Dispute Clarify
↑ Hide Replies
Cuaroc(8829) Banned
1 point

better logic than Dana uses.

Side: No (Cuaroc).
Support Dispute Clarify
Sitar(3680) Disputed
0 points

Libertarians For Life would disagree with you. .

Side: Yes (Sitara).
Support Dispute Clarify
↑ Hide Replies
Cuaroc(8829) Disputed Banned
2 points

Fact: they aren't Libertarians if they're profile.

Side: No (Cuaroc).
Support Dispute Clarify
↓ Show Replies
DKCairns(868)
3 points

Seems to me that the debate creator is very confused about this subject.

This is the fourth entry on this subject so would have thought they would have got the message by now

Libertarians are pro choice NOT pro life.

Side: No (Cuaroc).
Support Dispute Clarify
GenericName(3430)
3 points

"fact: Abortion violates the nonagression principle because it kills a living human child

That is an opinion, not a fact. That is the opinion that this entire conversation and conflict is based on.

Fact: Unborn children have the right to live.

Again, that is an opinion, not a fact.

Fact: Saying that Libertarians cannot be prolife is the not true Scotsman fallacy.

First, I have not said that they cannot be. Second, it really isn't. There are certain aspects of religions and ideologies that are so basic that without them, the belief isn't being adhered to. For example, saying that a Christian who does not believe in the divinity of Christ is no true Christian would not be employing the No True Scotsman fallacy. Saying that a Socialist who does not believe in the public ownership of the means of production and distribution is not a socialist would not be employing the No True Scotsman."

Still trying to get her to respond to this comment of mine.

Side: No (Cuaroc).
Support Dispute Clarify
↑ Hide Replies
Cuaroc(8829) Clarified Banned
1 point

sadly she'll probably ban you for breaking the "rules"

Side: Yes (Sitara).
Support Dispute Clarify
↑ Hide Replies
Sitar(3680) Disputed
0 points

I have no plans to ban anyone. /

Side: Yes (Sitara).
Support Dispute Clarify
↓ Show Replies
Cuaroc(8829) Banned
2 points

ahhh Wrathful Dana good times.

Side: No (Cuaroc).
Support Dispute Clarify
Cuaroc(8829) Banned
2 points

The Fromwithin days of Dana Funny times those where.

Side: No (Cuaroc).
Support Dispute Clarify
umaroth(7) Banned
2 points

No response from Dana in over a day not that big of a surprise she doesn't have a 'debating" attention span longer than a day.

Side: No (Cuaroc).
Support Dispute Clarify
Cuaroc(8829) Banned
1 point

About time you make good on your word. http://www.createdebate.com/argument/newarg/78045/0/612227

Side: No (Cuaroc).
Support Dispute Clarify

Browse More Debates