CreateDebate


Debate Info

6
6
Indeed Indeed sir
Debate Score:12
Arguments:9
Total Votes:12
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Indeed (5)
 
 Indeed sir (4)

Debate Creator

CrapWeasel(537) pic



Socrates, Liberals and Kavanaugh

 

------------------------------

PRE KAVANAUGH

 'Hell to pay' if Democrats don't block Trump's Supreme Court pick


USA TODAY 

Indeed

Side Score: 6
VS.

Indeed sir

Side Score: 6
1 point

Hello Crappy:

Look.. You belong to the right wing tribe.. The right wing tribe believes the accuser is a LIAR.. Oh, they have NO evidence of that. They just BELIEVE it, cause they wanna..

I, on the other hand, belong to the regular people tribe.. As a regular person, we'd like to HEAR what the accuser says before we pronounce judgment. That's the American way..

excon

Side: Indeed
CrapWeasel(537) Disputed
2 points

Look.. You belong to the right wing tribe.. The right wing tribe believes the accuser is a LIAR..

Some of her own friends say she's a liar.

Oh, they have NO evidence of that.

The old prove a negative fallacy. You can't prove unicorns don't exist. You have no evidence they don't exist. So you know what that means.

Side: Indeed sir
excon(18261) Disputed
1 point

Some of her own friends say she's a liar.

Hello again, Crappy:

All the more reason to put her under oath and interrogate her.. But, the 11 right wing MEN on the committee are afraid to do that.. You know why, doncha?

excon

Side: Indeed
Amarel(5669) Disputed
2 points

It doesn't matter if the accuser is a liar or not. After 37 years, she may be mis-remembering. But that's not the point either. The point is that she has no evidence whatsoever. She cannot name the place, time, or any corroborating witness. There cannot be an investigation. Kavanaugh is willing to make statements under oath while his accuser is not. There is literally nothing to any of this.

The left doesn't actually take her accusation seriously either. If they did, they would not have waited until the moment of peak political expediency to bring the accusation to light. It's nothing more than a baseless hit by a morally corrupt left who is more than happy to play on the emotional biases of their zombie like following. Seriously con, put the shoe on the other foot and it's pretty clear what bullshit this is.

If you think it's the American way to derail a career and a nomination for a singular unsubstantiated and apparently baseless accusation, then you can fuck right off con.

Imagine the state of affairs if every major political nominations was derailed by blatant political hits like this one. Of course that wouldn't happen because historically the public doesn't get behind the accusing woman if the man is on the Left. Jesus Christ they should just nominate him with the new rules created by Dems and give a giant middle finger all this bullshit.

Side: Indeed sir
wankypoo(20) Disputed
1 point

I, on the other hand, belong to the regular people tribe.

There are no regular people. Only people brainwashed with this or that idea of what is normal and what is good. Regular means common, standard issue etc. so by calling yourself that you are implying that you are just another cookie cutter product of your culture.

Side: Indeed sir
Dingohead(68) Disputed
1 point

There are no regular people

No. There's no regular you. Your reality is so upside down that even a simple salad confuses you if two different leaf types are used.

Side: Indeed
Dingohead(68) Disputed
1 point

so by calling yourself that you are implying that you are just another cookie cutter product of your culture.

In otherwords, you.

Side: Indeed
No arguments found. Add one!