CreateDebate


Debate Info

14
26
Sure.... I believe it. Hehe What? Hell no!
Debate Score:40
Arguments:29
Total Votes:47
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Sure.... I believe it. Hehe (13)
 
 What? Hell no! (15)

Debate Creator

Hellno(17753) pic



Srom Says This is the Real Face of Jesus, Is He Right?

Sure.... I believe it. Hehe

Side Score: 14
VS.

What? Hell no!

Side Score: 26
-2 points
Dremorius(861) Disputed
2 points

The Shroud Of Turin has already been debunked. It turned out to be a Medieval prank. :P

And the image of Jesus was just a guess of what the renaissance painters thought he looked like. They thought of him as a comely Italian-looking man, because that perception of him comforted them. Other countries did the same, depicting him as oriental, black, etc. But the depiction of a white Jesus became more popular above the rest.

Also, Jesus was supposed to look butt ugly, as mentioned in the bible.

Side: What? Hell no!
1 point

-----The Shroud Of Turin has already been debunked. It turned out to be a Medieval prank. ---/

There is zero way to prove that. Don't be a sheep.

Side: Sure.... I believe it. Hehe
1 point

----And the image of Jesus was just a guess of what the renaissance painters thought he looked like----

There is no possible way to know that either. Thinking for yourself is okay...

Side: Sure.... I believe it. Hehe
1 point

-----Other countries did the same, depicting him as oriental, black, etc. But the depiction of a white Jesus became more popular above the rest----

Jews look white. Go to google images. No? I didn't figure you had it in you....

Side: Sure.... I believe it. Hehe
Srom(12206) Disputed
0 points

Where does it say in the bible that jesus was butt ugly? I don't think it said anything like that.

Side: Sure.... I believe it. Hehe
Hellno(17753) Clarified
1 point

On The History Channel? Oh! Well that changes everything... it has to be true.

Side: Sure.... I believe it. Hehe
1 point

Oh! dawkins said it was true. Let me cream my pants. Oh crap, he was wrong again. Reverse the cream....

Side: What? Hell no!
5 points

I already explained in the other thread that it is just the Shroud of Turin, a fake artifact produced around 1350.

Artifact trade was huge back then. People in the Catholic church wanted proof, so they tried to find pieces of the True Cross and other relics.

Almost nothing was found, however, besides a few fakes and some bones that might be real or might just be random bones.

Side: What? Hell no!
1 point

Besides... that dude doesn't look Middle Eastern at all, and Jesus should.

Side: What? Hell no!
_deleted0_(850) Disputed
0 points

People probably looked a lot different 2000 years ago.

....................................................................

Side: What? Hell no!
2 points

No! Jesus is a good looking guy, this is not him, I ain't buying it

Side: What? Hell no!
EdudModnar(209) Disputed
1 point

How do you know Jesus was good-looking? Have you stolen my time machine?

Side: Sure.... I believe it. Hehe
RandomDude(1286) Disputed
1 point

Listen bird, don't give me any of your crap!

Side: What? Hell no!
1 point

I'm not saying 'hell no'.

I know that picture.

I saw a documentary about some scientists trying to make logic in the bible.

The sheets that corps of Jesus was covered in, apparently is existing.

And the face of Jesus is said to be on that sheet.

That is because, when Jesus was dead in the grave, an angle came, and when he came, and Jesus rose from the death, there was a lightning.

If you know something about light, then you know that a scanner, is a light that travels and makes an x ray .. or something like that.

That is what the 'lightning' or the angle was. The lightning traveled through the grave, and Left a x ray on the sheet Jesus was lying in.

You think its ridiculous?

Its been proved that it is possible :) But if its the picture is Jesus is hard to tell.

Side: What? Hell no!
Emperor(1348) Disputed
2 points

That's ....beyond untrue.

That's not even

I mean, that doesn't even make sense... Are you drunk?

An angel came? And lightning? In a cave?

Made a mark on a cloth that was produced in 1350?

We know it was made in 1350 because of radiometric dating.

You say you're not brainwashed or indoctrinated into christianity, yet you say things like this and I really wonder...

Side: What? Hell no!
_deleted0_(850) Disputed
1 point

Uhm.. I don't think you got my point.

I'm on the 'what? hell no!' side.

And that is nothing I made up. That is a documentary on History Channel who said that. I'm just saying what they said about that picture. They said a lightning came and made an x ray on the sheet that Jesus was buried in.

I'm not supporting that theory, I think it's ridiculous

Side: What? Hell no!
1 point

Jesus was Arabic. Not white. Also, this has been carbon dated to 1350. Because of that, fundamentalists say carbon dating is inaccurate, but there is no evidence other that a 1350 year cloth to back that up.

Jesus was born in the Middle East, so he would be Arabic. Since almost every European from the Middle Ages was a white supremecist, they drea Jesus as being white. This wouldn't be what he looked like.

Side: What? Hell no!

NOOOOOO!

The face of Jesus has never been revealed. All artists merely did was try and create an image of him. No one knows if Jesus had a beard or brown hair but apparently, people have started to envision Jesus as that.

So no, it couldn't be unless it's some sort of miracle stone or picture.

Side: What? Hell no!