State your political ideology then define it.
Democracy: Government OF, FOR and BY the people, not just the few who can buy it. Capitalism with reasonable controls, socialistic DEMOCRACY in those "cases". It's what we had after TR broke up the oligarchy of the 1800's, it's what we need again! IMO. Get back to what the founders had in mind, with some modernization. :-) What is up with this AL ??????????? Federal oil and gas resources provide an important source of energy for the United States; create jobs in the oil and gas industry; and generate billions of dollars annually in revenues that are shared between federal, state, and tribal governments. Interior reported collecting over $49 billion from fiscal years 2011 through 2015 from royalties and other payments. This makes oil and gas resources one of the federal government's largest sources of nontax revenue. Do you not know about the Capitalism your LOVED GOVERNMENT is involved in you IGNORANT BASTARD ???????? Federal oil and gas resources provide an important source of energy for the United States By choice. Specifically the choice of rich, incredibly powerful oil barons with billions of dollars invested in fossil fuels. There is no scientifically plausible reason to still be using non-renewable energy. It's simply about money. you IGNORANT BASTARD ? Do you deny that you financed Hitler? 1
point
'Pragmatic Realism' is what I call it. I take what is, good and bad, and try and find a sustainable, rational way to harness the bad and accentuate the good. The closest to it, so far, is Social Democracy. Plato's Republic explains a lot of my core values but in application is different to what I want. In Social Democracy we are as greedy and selfish as we inevitably are but are forced to be so to only so much of an extent that the poor still have a chance to outdo us through smart and hard work. 0
points
Tribal Socialism: It’s very similar to National Socialism but minus the Aryan racism (even geniuses make mistakes). It is a more equal system than unbridled capitalism- but doesn’t revoke individual ownership of property and business. I would side with the Democrats, except I believe in a huge degree of Nationalism and NOT open borders. 2
points
@Slavedevice Are you familiar with Social Democracy? I think it fits your ideology and it is a much better thing to be than a "National Socialist". You seem to be misguided under the impression that Hitler was an actual socialist and that "national socialism" was ever a thing. The Nazis were fascists, the word "socialism" was only used to mask the system of strict conformity and ideological uniformity as a system of unity which protects the working class. Me first. Exploit the sheepeople to the utmost:- that's what they're here for. Find the loopholes in the system in which you are operating and milk them for all they're worth to my advantage. Love many, trust few and always paddle your own canoe. Always look after number 1 and make sure you don't stand in number 2s. Never give a sucker or loser a break. Following your cock-eyed logic to its natural conclusion then, as one tiny example, all the people who are sailing their ocean going yachts around the Mediterranean, dining at the Chantecler restaurant in the Negresco Hotel, Nice before retiring to their mansion in Cap' Antibes must all be clinical psychopaths. Have you ever analyzed the reasons why you're one of life's failures? Can you not recognize that it is your resentfulness that condemns to to a meaningless life of sniping at the successful. You are one of the many millions of worthless,downtrodden minions who are stepped upon daily by the accomplished affluent who enjoy the finer things in life. Of course you have long since acknowledged the AFORESAID TRUTHS but have trained your mind to block out the FACTS in favour of labouring under the misapprehension that the successful wealthy are all clinical psychopaths. |