CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:102
Arguments:65
Total Votes:116
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 The Big Bang, another scientific theory touted as fact looks to be another flat Earther. (63)

Debate Creator

FromWithin(8241) pic



The Big Bang, another scientific theory touted as fact looks to be another flat Earther.

I wonder when Scientists and Global warming alarmists will ever admit they have no clue. They laugh at any theories pertaining to Creationism but constantly grasp onto any theory that better fits into their pre ordained beliefs.

www.msn.com/en-us/video/news/new-theory-suggests-there-was-no-big-bang/vi-AA9gwWx

Add New Argument
7 points

This new theory actually completely destroys Christianity/creationism. It also only destroys a small portion of the Big Bang. It is more like people who think the Earth is a perfect round ball, not like people who think the Earth is flat.

2 points

When has science not destroyed religious theories of how the world was made by Doctor Dingle and her army of angels in 7 minutes?

1 point

Yes, but you need to explain that to the religious people because they don't get it.

When has science not destroyed religious theories of how the world was made by Doctor Dingle and her army of angels in 7 minutes?

Probably never since there is no "Doctor Dingle" and probably because Christians don't believe the Earth was created in seven minutes.

This actually gives more support to those who believe God is the universe itself. I believe that's just Pantheism, but maybe not. It doesn't destroy Christianity, but it does disrupt the perceived view of creation in Genesis. All Genesis says is God created the Heavens and The Earth. I don't think Genesis covers anything else on creation in relation to planetary constructs.

2 points

I was mainly referring to all of the Christians who use the idea that the universe had to have a starting point to prove God exists. I agree that Christianity isn't completely destroyed.

1 point

Pantheism just is sexed up Atheism.

"I wonder when Scientists and Global warming alarmists will ever admit they have no clue."

Probably never, because it's wrong. They don't have 'no clue.' They in fact have an overwhelming number of clues, each of which may call into question or lend credit to one theory or another.

Your claim is like stating that someone playing the game clue has no clue just because they haven't yet correctly deduced the identity of the murderer- and you're wrong, because they know that it was done in the Conservatory with the candlestick, and that it was neither Professor Plum nor Colonel Mustard.

FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

Gee now use your arguments and apply it to yourself when attacking the Christian faith and Creation theory.

4 points

Sure thing. The Christian faith and creation hypothesis accuse Colonel Mustard of killing Professor Plum in the Kitchen with the Knife, even though Professor Plum is clearly alive, Miss Scarlett is clearly the victim, and there is a gaping gunshot wound on her forehead.

Because Miss Scarlett betrayed Professor Plum in an unrelated incident, and God raised Professor Plum back from the dead.

Admit they have no clue? I'm fairly certain that the scientists who investigate these types of things have a good clue about the composition of the universe.

2 points

The math rules out the singularity we always assumed preceded the Big Bang, not actually the BB itself. Reporters have had a hard time telling the difference, but astrophysicists have not. Read what they say about it, don't go by quippy little newsbites.

2 points

Here is a laymen friendly article that covers it in much more detail and accuracy than the video FromWithin posted:

http://earthsky.org/space/what-if-the-universe-had-no-beginning

Its not that they have no clue at all, it is that they preach their theory as fact when decade after decade their theories are proven wrong. How bout admitting you have no proof of anything and stop preaching it as fact.

thousandin1(1931) Clarified
1 point

How bout admitting you have no proof of anything and stop preaching it as fact.

After you.

1 point

So you think you know better than the overwhelming majority (and I mean OVERWHELMING majority) of the world wide scientific community?

Based on what?

You realize that it was scientists that came up with that new hypothesis, right? That's the point of science: to keep searching for new answers.

1 point

another idiotic rant from our current troll.

1 point

I don't see the evidence against it. Show it to me if it exists