CreateDebate


Debate Info

14
6
True False
Debate Score:20
Arguments:14
Total Votes:21
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 True (5)
 
 False (3)

Debate Creator

awsom4ever(149) pic



The Existence of God

True

Side Score: 14
VS.

False

Side Score: 6

The existence of God cannot be proven. What basis would we use to test his existence that doesn't conflict with his perceived nature? As I have said before God is a faith based god.

Side: True
3 points

of course he is real who do think lets you have good days and bad days. He lets you live and gives you money.

Side: True

A naturalist would say good and bad days are subjective and there is no true measure for them. A naturalist would also say that good and bad days can be explained by seeing the physical effects of the actions that lead up to the day the person had. A naturalist would say that living is physically controlled by the regulation of your body and its response to outside stimuli. Any person could explain were money comes from without mentioning any divine force or being. Now there may be more schools of thought that have similar views that relate to what I've posted above, but naturalism can to my head first and seemed to fit properly.

Side: True
3 points

I think the thread should have been worded;- The Existence of a God. I've attended lecturers where the very convincing and scientifically researched arguments have expounded the merits of The Big Bang''Theory''. With an open mind I'm still not at all convinced that this phenomenon ever happened. Admittedly this may be due to my limited intellect being unable to grasp the enormity of what is being claimed to have occurred many billions of years. That train of thought still leaves the question of where did we all come from. I believe in evolution, but what was the power which started the whole evolutionary process? The Big bang ''Theory'' asks us to believe that this all commenced from nothing. My simple mind has difficulty comprehending how this could have been possible. I am being asked to accept that for all my life I've been labouring under the misapprehension that;- nothing plus nothing equals nothing and nothing from nothing equals nothing. From nothing comes nothing. My conclusion therefore is that whilst all the fanciful notions of the existing man made deities are the result of some brilliant and well meaning scholars trying to explain the mysteries of the cosmos at a time of limited scientific knowledge, there must be a superior, and mercenary intelligence which is responsible for all life as well as the existence of the universe.

Side: True
MuckaMcCaw(1970) Disputed
3 points

What makes you think the Big Bang Theory posits that the Big Bang came from nothing? This has rarely if ever been suggested by the cosmologists supporting the Big Bang. The only people who seem to believe this notion of the Big Bang are those who don't believe in it.

Side: False
1 point

I'm not too educated about universal science and its application in space, but I believe the Big Bang Theory only states that the universe we currently can observe started from a singularity and then expanded. I don't know if it has claimed that it was the absolute start of the universe.

Side: False
daver(1771) Clarified
1 point

I believe the BB theory contends that the BB was the beginning of this particular universe, but also possibly one of many such events operating within a cycle of collapse followed by expansion.

Side: True
2 points

That depends on your definition of existence, does it not?

Side: False