It seems that your arguments are nothing more than right wing talking points with no substance.

1. It is still illegal to abort a fetus before the nervous system develops.

2. People still have to pay out of pocket for an abortion so no, your tax dollars are not going to abortions.

3. I live in Louisiana and I could leave my house rite now and buy a gun from the store down the street before you even reply to this.

4. There have been transgender people for as long as civilization has existed. Where do you think they have been using the bathroom? What, you think they are going to decide rite now to start molesting people?

5. I don't think you can be considered pro life if you don't even want to allow an abortion to take place if the pregnancy could kill the mother and then you publicly shame them for having an abortion.

As wth every Liberal I have ever debated, you only see the few things that are good about Liberalism, and ignore your inhumanity.

Hitler would have made a great Liberal when it came to abortion and controlling the people.

Liberal -- adjective -- willing to respect or accept behaviour or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas.

favourable to or respectful of individual rights and freedoms.

"Controlling" is the antithesis of this word.

Socialism will be a small foot note in the history of mankind. Your were lucky enough to live during the time of debt spending. Sociaism lives and breathes off debt spending.

Fiat-capitalism lives and breathes off debt spending.

We see every year more nations, more cities, going into default on their loans because MONEY DOES NOT GROW ON TREES! Spare me the few sociaist nations who do not have huge debt. They soon will and if they don't, then they are not bleeding heart fools like in most Socialist nations.

Money is literally created out of thin air by banks when they impart loans. That is the very basis of the currency model currently in us. It is, by default, a debt-based monetary system created through debt levied on regular citizens: an unpayable debt, as you point out. And what happens when the un-payable debts cause an economy to collapse? Well, the institutions who created that money from thin air and loaned it out, get bailed out by the taxes the average citizen pays towards the cost of all those "socialist" projects that are supposed to keep his country afloat -- roads, hospitals, schools, a military, healthcare.

Idiot Socialists lack the simple intelligence to know that like credit cards, the point always comes wen the minimum payment can no longer be afforded.

Capitalism is based, once again, upon credit creation.

America is 20 TRILLION in debt

Ask yourself, to whom?!

thanks to big spending Liberals (closet socialists). Every time these past fifty years that the Republicans(the adults in the room) try to slow the rate of growth of our spending, Democrats scream how they supposedly hate the poor

Spending deficit necessarily increases when taxes drop, particularly when the average wage is insufficient to meet the living costs of a paradigm which is almost entirely privately operated. Nationalization counteracts this problem.

America is lmost spending the cost of our entire military budget on making the interest payments on our national debt

Debt to whom?

(when interest rates are historically low). To a sane person, that is a hideous thing to see that much of our tax dollars simply being spent on the interest payment. IT CAN NOT CONTINUE YOU MINDLESS BLEEDING HEART MORON!

Do you understand how loans work? Why is it, do you think, that nearly every working American has credit of some kind? It's because wages don't suffice, and it's because infrastructure that should be public and operated at a controlled cost is private and operated at expense to the average person. Just look at your healthcare costs to see what I mean.

No nation or people can afford to give everyone a good life on the backs of tax payers.

Most people are taxpayers. If I pay taxes, I expect to see something in return for them. And if I as an average earner pay away an aount of tax which leaves me short of the expendable income necessary for a basic standard of living, then it is only fair to expect those much more fortunate to pay a higher proportionate share, particularly when those more fortunate utilize public infrastructure for a profit that depends on the financial-fleecing of the working class.

It's a ponsey scheme for corrupt politicians buting votes...... for a time until it all collapses.

Capitalism is, yes.

Tell me, in all your childish irresponsibility, what happens to poor people when the monopoly money runs out?

You mean the fiat-currency that banks create out of thin air, loan out, and ask interest back upon?

Well, what happens when it "runs out" (if there is such a thing), is that the banks call in the payments, the economy collapses, and our taxes are used to prop up their failed business model, while we lose our houses, our jobs, and some old men in suits get big fat cheques in the post.

There will no longer be money for even safety nets.

There's always enough money to go around. Just not enough people smart enough to make sure that it does.

Intelligent responsible people live within their means and do not spend money they don't have.

This is trite and, frankly, stupid. Most people in the US who work, have a form of credit. The median wage in the US, is less than the required wage for a basic standard of life at average living costs, thus people must utilize credit. They must utilize credit to get educated, to pay hospital bills, to afford rent, whatever.

That's a political choice: it's an engineered system of financial autocracy: an oligarchy by all reasonable standards. If wages were high enough and transport and living costs low enough that people could live without debt, then it would be fine. But they aren't. And it doesn't help one iota that loans (thus debt) are functionally necessary for the creation of currency.

Most socialist nations are in bigtime financial trouble

Such as?

The country with the highest debt to GDP ratio is Japan: one of the US's main capitalist allies. The US is 12th on that list (a capitalist country). Germany is 43rd. Finland is 52nd. Iceland is 65th. Sweden is 89th. Denmark is 103rd (highest living standards in the world). Norway is 113th.

due to corrupt politicians who buy votes at the expense of their nation's future solvency. You can't keep taking hard working responsible people's money to give to lazy dead beats.

That's not at all what socialism is about. You work, I presume? If you work for a company, you probably make a miniscule fraction of the profit that company creates (like most people). Socialism is simply the idea that people ought to be rewarded more; have more say; be valued more as humans.

Even if very large company owners took a maximum 5 million a year, and dispersed surplus profit to their workers, the standard of living for those workers would skyrocket. They would pay more tax, obviously, but would also live muc more comfortably. Those taxes, from owner and employees, would be used to provide a country that offers opportunity and investment in its citizens: educationally, medicinally, and structurally.

But instead, less than 50 people on this planet own or control more than HALF of its wealth.

Pyramidal, indeed.

The hard workers finally give up.

I am much more likely to give up knowing I am valued little, given wages to the minimum a company can legally get away with, while my boss takes my hard work and makes millions, and through loopholes available it seems only to the rich, dodges paying his taxes.

That's capitalism.

Capitalism and conservative values is what made America great

I personally saw early America as a place of progressive values, for its time. People didn't laugh and sneer at intelligence; nor did they have an issue with providing for those less fortunate. Traditionalism is fine, but trying to wrap up greed, selfishness and hatred for your fellow humans as some limp nostalgia trip is not.

, and we are seeing how socialistic Liberal ideology is bankrpting America financially and morally.

If you understood economics you would understand that capitalism thrives upon debt-bondage: it requires a class of people who are heavily capitalized upon: that's your starving Ethiopian children and your Congolese mine owners; your Indian slum families whose water is stolen by Coca-Cola; your Chinese child labourer who makes your Apple computer.

You get the point.

Conservatives have always supported safety nets for those who can not help themselves.

Apparently not.

We are not total fools to think we can give everyone a good life no matter how irresponsible and lazy they are.

MONEY DOES NOT GROW ON TRESS!

Or "trees".