The Party of Inclusion is not for everyone.
True.
Side Score: 22
|
Wait..., what? No!!!
Side Score: 11
|
|
|
|
2
points
Issue: Free Speech. Group being included: Protesters. Group being impacted: People who go to hear the speech. Alternative solution: Hard jail time and steep fines for people disrupting the speech.
Supporting Evidence:
http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/
Side: True.
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
The problem is with the conflicting definitions imposed on the word "marriage." The problem can be fixed by separating the conflicting definitions and coming up with a new term/word. Trying to force the conflicting definitions onto one word will cause friction and animosity. Alternatively, the religious right can come up with an alternate word. However, it is much easier for the government to change. ;) Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1
point
Issue: Abortion. Group being included: Women. Group being impacted: Men. Alternative Solutions (there are 2): 1. Give women the right to an abortion BUT take away the right to force the father to pay child support for 18 years for a pregnancy he would rather see terminated. 2. Give women the right to force the father to pay child support for 18 years for a pregnancy he would rather see terminated AND also the right to abort UNLESS the father wants the child. Side: True.
1
point
1
point
0
points
Autonomous women making independent decisions about their lives should not expect men to finance their choice. If a woman wants to force a man to pay for 18 years of child support she should first prove that she is either not an autonomous woman or that her decision is not independent. Otherwise, she should finance her choice. Side: True.
You are saying that there is no way to include everyone. And I would have to agree in the classical sense. However, there are solutions for some problems that minimize the friction and animosity between the groups involved. The Democrats do not seem to care much for those types of solutions. ;) Side: True.
1
point
It's true, and in reality, if there are white refugees, the non white countries tax them for being white and dump them in camps. Side: True.
|
1
point
Actually no party can be for absolutely everyone. So at face value your statement is true. Yet it is also true that the Democrats aspire to include more groups outside of the typical whites than the Republicans do, so in contrast their claim of Inclusion would still be true. Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1
point
1
point
1
point
|