This is a private debate. See the FAQ for more info.
Challenge Debate: The Supreme and Ultimate Reality or the bare assertion fallacy
My argument, is not me. I have very little to do with "my argument". The argument I am making is none other that The Supreme and Ultimate Reality. Ponder deep what those words mean.
The argument, is not me. I am just a messenger. A messenger of The Supreme and Ultimate Reality. I'm just a wall of text coming from a cartoon frog. I'm not what is important.
My argument is The Supreme and Ultimate Reality. It speaks for itself. I cannot say anymore, only The Name.
So that established, the target of this philosophical observation is not me, but The Supreme and Ultimate Reality. It isn't really "my" argument. The Supreme and Ultimate Reality makes a case on its own. I say that truth stands clear apart from falsehood.
The philosophical observation is....
So understand that this is not my argument, but "The Supreme and Ultimate Reality". I say that "The Supreme and Ultimate Reality" speaks for itself.
So who is right? The Supreme and Ultimate Reality, or the philosopher who shouted at it, "You are a bare assertion fallacy!".
|
|