CreateDebate


Debate Info

0
0
The Supreme & Ulimate Reality Bare assertion fallacy
Debate Score:0
Arguments:0
Total Votes:0
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph

Debate Creator

TzarPepe(315) pic



This is a private debate. See the FAQ for more info.

Challenge Debate: The Supreme and Ultimate Reality or the bare assertion fallacy

My argument, is not me. I have very little to do with "my argument". The argument I am making is none other that The Supreme and Ultimate Reality. Ponder deep what those words mean.

The argument, is not me. I am just a messenger. A messenger of The Supreme and Ultimate Reality. I'm just a wall of text coming from a cartoon frog. I'm not what is important. 

My argument is The Supreme and Ultimate Reality. It speaks for itself. I cannot say anymore, only The Name. 

So that established, the target of this philosophical observation is not me, but The Supreme and Ultimate Reality. It isn't really "my" argument. The Supreme and Ultimate Reality makes a case on its own. I say that truth stands clear apart from falsehood. 

The philosophical observation is....

"In philosophical terms, your argument commits a “bare assertion fallacy” i.e. the argument is assumed to be true merely because it says it is true, and it offers no supportive premise other than qualities inherent in the original statement it purports to prove. After all, the same ontological argument could be used to prove the existence of any perfect thing at all."

So understand that this is not my argument, but "The Supreme and Ultimate Reality". I say that "The Supreme and Ultimate Reality" speaks for itself. 

So who is right? The Supreme and Ultimate Reality, or the philosopher who shouted at it, "You are a bare assertion fallacy!".



TzarPepe(315)

The Supreme & Ulimate Reality

Side Score: 0
VS.
Dermot(3644)

Bare assertion fallacy

Side Score: 0
No arguments found. Add one!
No arguments found. Add one!