The Supreme court is now hearing arguments concerning our freedoms to say no.
|
I understand you want everyone to think like you think, but it will never happen. There are such things as unnatural orientations, and people have a right to stand up for their beliefs. You can believe what you want, and we can believe what we want. It's called freedom to dissagree. -FromWithin Would you like to talk about this? I'd be happy to slam you, I just don't know where to start. 1. There was a law. An anti discrimination law.it said you cannot discriminate because of who someone is. 2. Baking a cake is not expression. In this situation, they didn't even discuss what would be on the cake. 3. No one is stifling his freedom of religion. NO ONE! He can still pray! 4. You can't use your freedom of speech to infringe upon someone else's right to equal protection under the law. It doesn't work that way. Feel free to ask questions! I'm always here! 1
point
How many times must you be told to respond to the original debate and not this fool's copied debate? You obviously are a coward not to respond to the original debate because you want no response to your words. The people who respond to this copied debate do so for one reason. TO INSULT ME! They never address the actual debate. They don't want a forum to voice their opinions. They want to insult the person who created the debate. Yet here you are wallowing with the insulting deceivers. What's that say about you? 1
point
So, by your thought then any business can deny someone a product if they don't like a particular quality to them? Like say.....a white owner can deny business to a black customer because they are black? What about a Jewish deli denying business to a Christian? Or a business selling men's suites refusing to cater to a woman? All because of who they are and not how they act? Do you not see an issue with that? 0
points
|
