The Ten Commandment monument in Alabama was put up, and DESTROYED in the same day..
Should people who work for the government IMPOSE their religion on us?
excon
We FOUGHT a war to STOP it
Side Score: 3
|
God is Great - Ali Akbar
Side Score: 4
|
|
|
|
1
point
The argument is that GOD is only religion and cannot be separated by the Separation of church and state. Representation of the word state axiom can describe an unreligious state of God to witness. Therefor it becomes a test of ownership of word state. A religion which is not a representation of an impartial or non-biased GOD, may in fact make a false accusation to directed the court to fabricate its own separation by lack of equal representation before impartial judicial separation. The Ten Commandments, X Commandments are a display of laws as historic content. This United State can and has been impartial separated from religion using a basic mathematic axiom as example. The publics test under oath is can a person tell and describe to others how two word’s presented in an identical way, be separated apart without providing state of each word independently. GOD and GOD, One is religion and the other is axiom, it may be impossible to identify without hearing the state of each word by its representative state which is which? As a source One Nation Under Principle (A guide to the common defense, 2016) provides a guide to assembling an axiom for view. A book that simply points out the obvious of a self-evident presentation which could have been placed together as alterative representation at any time using GOD as a freedom without self-value assigned by agent. The Judicial Court holds the Common defense of Separation of church and state. A public may question each Separation impartiality made as it is a common defense, and separation may Bear-Arm with as its own representation to principle, on behalf of not only Constitutional Separation as impartiality against democratic imperialism. It can hold its self-value as a non-religion. Side: We FOUGHT a war to STOP it
|
1
point
If it was Islamic, Liberals would applaud it as them being multicultural and tolerant. Side: God is Great - Ali Akbar
Liberals do NOT give radical Islam a pass, no more than they give radical Christianity a pass! The key word here is "radical". Liberals don't like radicals, but they show respect for ALL religions .... as the Constitution says we SHOULD do. Obviously, to some radical conservatives, the Constitution only means what THEY want it to mean. BLC=1 more. Side: We FOUGHT a war to STOP it
1
point
That sounds very wasteful. Unless it was performance art. Oh, wait! I get it! It's performance art! It represents the waste and destruction and misdirection performed in the name of religion. Well now, that was pretty good. I hope it goes on tour so I can see closer to home the commandments put up and taken down same day. Side: God is Great - Ali Akbar
1
point
I couldn't care less about a monument being put up. I do find it disgusting that liberals think vandalism is okay. I certainly wouldn't destroy any monument that I didn't agree with. That's called being civilized. It's also freedom of speech. It could also be a momento to someone of that faith or lack of faith who died in war amongst other things. I'm very anti Islam, but I will never hurt a Muslim, hurt a mosque, or destroy an Islamic monument. Liberals would burn a cross and never flinch. That's what is disturbing. Side: We FOUGHT a war to STOP it
|