CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
The antisemites and haters think BANNING me will keep me quiet.. DUDE!
Hello:
Nazis tried to shut the Jews up by MURDERING them, by LYING about them, by BANNING them.. These haters will NOT do that to me.. Clearly, they are deathly AFRAID of me. I'm a Jewish warrior. Anti-Semites HATE that.
Ever noticed that the biggest antisemites are almost always libs
Ever noticed that when Zionists can't beat you in an argument they pull out the anti-Semite card?
"Sir, I have a problem with you murdering Palestinian children."
"You anti-Semite!!"
"But sir, Palestinian children ARE Semites"
"You anti-Semite!!"
Change the record you nauseating twit. You've been using the exact same smear attack against everyone who opposes your BS since the end of the second world war. EVERYBODY hates Jews according to your insane worldview. The UN? Jew haters! Human Rights Watch? Jew haters! Amnesty International? Jew haters!
Sod off, cretin. When you run out of arguments you just resort to emotional blackmail like a damned infant.
The religions are all alike, no matter what they call themselves. They have no future—certainly none for the Germans. Fascism, if it likes, may come to terms with the Church. So shall I. Why not? That will not prevent me from tearing up Christianity root and branch, and annihilating it in Germany.
The Voice of Destruction (1940)p. 49
One is either a German or a Christian. You cannot be both... We don’t want people who keep one eye on the life in the hereafter. We need free men who feel and know that God is in themselves... Do you really believe the masses will ever be Christian again? Nonsense! Never again. That tale is finished… They will betray their God to us. They will betray anything for the sake of their miserable little jobs and incomes.
pp. 49-50
It is not Germany that will turn Bolshevistbut Bolshevism that will become a sort ofNational Socialist. Besides, there is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communist always will.... Our spirit is so strong, and the power of our magnificent movement to transform souls so elemental, that men are remodeled against their will... A social revolution would lend me new, unsuspected powers. I do not fear permeation with revolutionary Communist propaganda.
Dude! Are you saying that the Nazis were actually Communists?? And, if so, it was the Communists who murdered Jews, and the Nazis have been WRONGLY accused..
DUDE!! You're a Holocaust denier now???
DUDE again!
Step away from the FOX News.. It's rotting your brain.
Dude! Are you saying that the Nazis were actually Communists?? And, if so, it was the Communists who murdered Jews, and the Nazis have been WRONGLY accused..
I'm saying the Nazis were Communists who named themselves Nazis with no concern for what political wing the future left would try to label them as. Hitler claimed to be a socialist, was militant to Christianity, used the words "social justice" like a drumbeat, pandered to Islam, and wanted the means of production in Germany in his own hands.
DUDE!! You're a Holocaust denier now???
No. The Holocaust happened. And it would have never happened if not for Marxist psychopathy programmed into Hitler's mind. Ever noticed how when anti Jew rhetoric starts flying around, only Republicans ever defend the Jews? Not very Nazi like are we? I even had to defend them while you trashed Israel yesterday. You took the exact position of Hitler on Jews vs Palestinians.
DUDE again!
Dude 3 times.
Step away from the FOX News.. It's rotting your brain.
The "Voice of Destruction" is a book written by a Nazi who worked beside Hitler. Fox News wouldn't exist for another 60 years. And in his book he proposes Marxism, Marxist philosophy, and quotes Hitler doing the same.
Nazi nazi nazi
Hitler positions:
Anti Jew
Socialis
Marxist
Allied with the USSR to invade Poland
Anti Christian
Pro Islam
Wanted populace disarmed
Supressed speech by force
Tell me con. Are those Hitler's positions or the American left?
"Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal social justice, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge."
"Why We Are Anti-Semites," August 15, 1920 speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus. Translated from Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 16. Jahrg., 4. H. (Oct., 1968), pp. 390-420. Edited by Carolyn Yeager. [3]
"Since we are socialists, we must necessarily also be antisemites because we want to fight against the very opposite: materialism and mammonism… How can you not be an antisemite, being a socialist!"
Literally who quotes the Nazis except other Nazis? Essentially everything the Nazis said was a lie, which is something else you both share in common.
The majority of scholars identify Nazism in both theory and practice as a form of far-right politics.
"In our movement the two extremes come together: the Communists from the Left and the officers and students. These two have always been the most active elements, and it was the greatest crime that they used to oppose each other in street fights… Our party has already succeeded in uniting these two utter extremes within the ranks of our storm troops. They will form the core of the great German liberation movement, in which all without distinction will stand together when the day comes to say: ‘The Nation arises, the storm is breaking!’
As quoted in Der Fuehrer: Hitler’s Rise to Power, Konrad Heiden, Boston, MA, Beacon Press, 1969, p. 147, first published 1944. Part of Hitler’s quote also cited in Totalitarianism: Part Three of The Origins of Totalitarianism, Hannah Arendt, A Harvest Book, 1985, footnote, p. 7
"Since we are socialists, we must necessarily also be antisemites because we want to fight against the very opposite: materialism and mammonism… How can you not be an antisemite, being a socialist!"
Literally who quotes the Nazis except other Nazis? Essentially everything the Nazis said was a lie, which is something else you both share in common.
The majority of scholars identify Nazism in both theory and practice as a form of far-right politics.
To put it quite clearly: we have an economic programme. Point No. 13 in that programme demands the nationalisation of all public companies, in other words socialisation, or what is known here as socialism. … the basic principle of my Party’s economic programme should be made perfectly clear and that is the principle of authority… the good of the community takes priority over that of the individual. But the State should retain control; every owner should feel himself to be an agent of the State; it is his duty not to misuse his possessions to the detriment of the State or the interests of his fellow countrymen. That is the overriding point. The Third Reich will always retain the right to control property owners. If you say that the bourgeoisie is tearing its hair over the question of private property, that does not affect me in the least. Does the bourgeoisie expect some consideration from me?… Today’s bourgeoisie is rotten to the core; it has no ideals any more; all it wants to do is earn money and so it does me what damage it can. The bourgeois does me damage and would like to consign me and my movement to the devil.
Hitler's interview with Richard Breiting, 1931, published in Edouard Calic, ed., “First Interview with Hitler, 4 May 1931,” Secret Conversations with Hitler: The Two Newly-Discovered 1931 Interviews, New York: John Day Co., 1971, pp. 31-33. Also published under the title Unmasked: Two Confidential Interviews with Hitler in 1931, published by Chatto & Windus in 1971
"Since we are socialists, we must necessarily also be antisemites because we want to fight against the very opposite: materialism and mammonism… How can you not be an antisemite, being a socialist!"
Literally who quotes the Nazis except other Nazis? Essentially everything the Nazis said was a lie, which is something else you both share in common.
The majority of scholars identify Nazism in both theory and practice as a form of far-right politics.
The religions are all alike, no matter what they call themselves. They have no future—certainly none for the Germans. Fascism, if it likes, may come to terms with the Church. So shall I. Why not? That will not prevent me from tearing up Christianity root and branch, and annihilating it in Germany.
The Voice of Destruction (1940)p. 49
One is either a German or a Christian. You cannot be both... We don’t want people who keep one eye on the life in the hereafter. We need free men who feel and know that God is in themselves... Do you really believe the masses will ever be Christian again? Nonsense! Never again. That tale is finished… They will betray their God to us. They will betray anything for the sake of their miserable little jobs and incomes.
pp. 49-50
It is not Germany that will turn Bolshevistbut Bolshevism that will become a sort ofNational Socialist. Besides, there is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communist always will.... Our spirit is so strong, and the power of our magnificent movement to transform souls so elemental, that men are remodeled against their will... A social revolution would lend me new, unsuspected powers. I do not fear permeation with revolutionary Communist propaganda.
But I am a Marxist. I have never denied being a Marxist. I am proud to be a Marxist, and not least because they were the sworn ideological enemies of the Nazi regime.
You, on the other hand, have spent the last three hours quoting NAZIS, the most notorious liars in the entire history of politics.
I've got the entire Nazi regime saying this. You have the American left. Ironically, your clan calls Churchill a far right Nazi as well. Was he? Or was he a conservative who had to take down a socialist maniac psychopath with a square stache? Do you not find it odd that Churchill, who ran as a conservative right winger agreed with Hitler on nothing? Why do you think that is?
I've got the entire Nazi regime saying this. You have the American left.
Hello bront:
Uhhh, no.. No, you don't..
If the Nazis were commies, you're gonna have to explain WHY the commie Nazis declared war on the commie Russians, and killed MILLIONS of them.. Then, the commie Russians counterattacked and killed MILLIONS of commie Nazis..
Why would they do that if they believed the same shit???
This is false. Hitler signed a non-aggression pact with Stalin which he later declared he regretted.
Seventy-four years ago today, on August 23, 1939, the world was stunned by one of the most surprising foreign policy developments in modern history: the announcement that a treaty of nonaggression had been concluded between Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s USSR, who were ideological arch-enemies.
The Nazis hated and attacked Churchill, a rabid right winger.
This is also false. Hitler had a great deal of respect and admiration for Churchill, and never wanted to attack Britain in the first place. Furthermore, Churchill was not a "rabid right winger". This is completely, abhorrently false. In 1903 he said:-
I am an English Liberal. I hate the Tory (i.e. Conservative) Party, their men, their words and their methods.”
You are a pathological liar. EVERYTHING you say is a lie.
I am an English Liberal. I hate the Tory (i.e. Conservative) Party, their men, their words and their methods.”
And in 1903 he was young. He doesn't deny having been liberal in his youth. His views grew up when he grew up. Of course you never rebuttal me on this point, but throw it out there every time knowing fully well he was an anti socialist conservative who ruled Britain from the right wing. You also know he hated Islam with a passion.
He never claimed to be a "rabid right winger", ever.
He said worse things about Islam and Socialism than I do, and you label me a Nazi. Taking a hell of an ass beating tonigh eh nom? You should come back when you are on your A game. Off ya go.
This is false. Hitler signed a non-aggression pact with Stalin which he later declared he regretted.
---
The Soviet invasion of Poland was a military operation by the Soviet Union without a formal declaration of war. On 17 September 1939, the Soviet Union invaded Poland from the east, sixteen days after Germany invaded Poland from the west. Subsequent military operations lasted for the following 20 days and ended on 6 October 1939 with the two-way division and annexation of the entire territory of the Second Polish Republic by Germany and the Soviet Union.[7] The joint German-Soviet invasion of Poland was secretly agreed to following the signing of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact on 23 August 1939.[8]
Soon after they began their invasion of Poland, the Nazi leaders began urging the Soviets to play their agreed part and attack Poland from the east.
So you are admitting that you believe what the Nazis said was true, despite the fact that every single historical researcher who has ever investigated their claims has found them to be false. You quite literally believe the claims of Adolf Hitler because they contradict the opinions of the American left, which de facto discredits everything you say as stupid.
"The common good before the individual good." (Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz)
“The Nazi 25-point Programme,” Hitler’s speech on party's program (February 24, 1920) in Munich, Germany. Nazi Ideology Before 1933: A Documentation, Barbara Miller Lane, Leila J. Rupp, introduction and translation, Manchester University Press (1978) p. 43.
We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.
Hillary Clinton, Speech at Democratic Fundraiser, June 2004 [1]
"Since we are socialists, we must necessarily also be antisemites because we want to fight against the very opposite: materialism and mammonism… How can you not be an antisemite, being a socialist!"
Literally who quotes the Nazis except other Nazis? Essentially everything the Nazis said was a lie, which is something else you both share in common.
The majority of scholars identify Nazism in both theory and practice as a form of far-right politics.
"Since we are socialists, we must necessarily also be antisemites because we want to fight against the very opposite: materialism and mammonism… How can you not be an antisemite, being a socialist!"
"Why We Are Anti-Semites," August 15, 1920 speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus. Translated from Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 16. Jahrg., 4. H. (Oct., 1968), pp. 390-420. Edited by Carolyn Yeager. [2]
"Since we are socialists, we must necessarily also be antisemites because we want to fight against the very opposite: materialism and mammonism… How can you not be an antisemite, being a socialist!"
Literally who quotes the Nazis except other Nazis? Essentially everything the Nazis said was a lie, which is something else you both share in common.
The majority of scholars identify Nazism in both theory and practice as a form of far-right politics.
Indeed. Let us delve further into this topic to clear some things up, shall we?
It is now clear beyond all reasonable doubt that Hitler and his associates believed they were socialists, and that others, including democratic socialists, thought so too. The title of National Socialism was not hypocritical. The evidence before 1945 was more private than public, which is perhaps significant in itself. In public Hitler was always anti-Marxist, and in an age in which the Soviet Union was the only socialist state on earth, and with anti-Bolshevism a large part of his popular appeal, he may have been understandably reluctant to speak openly of his sources. His megalomania, in any case, would have prevented him from calling himself anyone's disciple. That led to an odd and paradoxical alliance between modern historians and the mind of a dead dictator. Many recent analysts have fastidiously refused to study the mind of Hitler; and they accept, as unquestioningly as many Nazis did in the 1930s, the slogan "Crusade against Marxism" as a summary of his views. An age in which fascism has become a term of abuse is unlikely to analyse it profoundly.
His private conversations, however, though they do not overturn his reputation as an anti-Communist, qualify it heavily. Hermann Rauschning, for example, a Danzig Nazi who knew Hitler before and after his accession to power in 1933, tells how in private Hitler acknowledged his profound debt to the Marxian tradition. "I have learned a great deal from Marxism" he once remarked, "as I do not hesitate to admit". He was proud of a knowledge of Marxist texts acquired in his student days before the First World War and later in a Bavarian prison, in 1924, after the failure of the Munich putsch. The trouble with Weimar Republic politicians, he told Otto Wagener at much the same time, was that "they had never even read Marx", implying that no one who had failed to read so important an author could even begin to understand the modern world; in consequence, he went on, they imagined that the October revolution in 1917 had been "a private Russian affair", whereas in fact it had changed the whole course of human history! His differences with the communists, he explained, were less ideological than tactical. German communists he had known before he took power, he told Rauschning, thought politics meant talking and writing. They were mere pamphleteers, whereas "I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun", adding revealingly that "the whole of National Socialism" was based on Marx.
Let’s cut through all the clutter and get straight to the main issues surrounding Donald Trump and allegations of anti-Semitism.
First, to suggest that President Trump dislikes Jews would have us believe that he despises his own daughter and grandchildren, when precisely the opposite seems to be true. Ivanka seems to be the apple of his eye. Indeed, when his daughter was dating Jared Kushner, an orthodox Jew from a famously observant family, her father could have easily dissuaded her from converting; instead, he publicly supported her and threw a kosher wedding.
Trump as anti-Semite is not implausible, but it is absurd and libelous. It would also suggest that his strong support for Israel is inauthentic, when it’s something he has worn on his sleeve for his entire adult life.
But, is Trump sending dog whistles to white supremacist supporters who dislike Jews? Is his failure, until yesterday, to publicly decry anti-Semitism a result of a fear of alienating racist backers?
To answer that, we have to identify two different varieties of modern anti-Semitism.
The first is hatred of Israel and a spoken desire to annihilate the Jewish state. Think of Iran, Hamas and Hezbollah. On these threats, Trump has thus far been far better than Barack Obama, who legitimized Iran with the nuclear deal.
While Trump was campaigning against the Iran deal, then-President Obama was literally sending hundreds of millions of dollars by plane in cash to the mullahs, even while they openly referred to Israel as a cancer that must be completely obliterated.
Shmuley Boteach is an American Orthodox rabbi, an international author of over 30 books, a TV host, activist and speaker. He was rabbi to Michael Jackson, Cory Booker and other public figures and has been recognized as one of the nation's most influential rabbis by Newsweek and The Washington Post. Reach him on Twitter @RabbiShmuley.
Resident Idiot what a good read for a DUMMY !!!!!!!!!!!!
WASHINGTON — Jewish billionaire megadonor Haim Saban lashed out at Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison Friday, calling him “clearly an anti-Semite and anti-Israel individual.”
At the Brooking Institution’s annual Saban Forum, which is hosted and funded by the media mogul, Saban chimed in from his seat in the audience during a question-and-answer session between CNN’s Jake Tapper and Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman. Tapper had earlier in the session asked the Israeli minister about Ellison’s controversial bid to chair the Democratic National Committee.
While he prefaced his remarks by saying Ellison’s Muslim faith was a “non-issue” and that some of his statements now have been more Zionist than that of Zionism visionary Theodore Herzl, Saban designated Ellison as fundamentally hostile to Jews and the Jewish State.
“If you go back to his positions, his papers, his speeches, the way he has voted, he is clearly an anti-Semite and anti-Israel individual,” he said. “Words matter and actions matter more. Keith Ellison would be a disaster for the relationship between the Jewish community and the Democratic Party.”
Here is the KICKER you Brain Dead DUMMY !!!!!!!!!!! If you had a BRAIN CELL you burnt it up on DOPE !!!!!!!!!!!
Saban, an Egyptian-born Israeli-American, is a major donor to Democrats. He and his wife Sheryl gave more than $12.5 million to former secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s latest bid for the White House.
Since 2007, Saban has been well known as one of the highest overall individual contributors to the Democratic Party. In 2002, he wrote a $7 million check to fund the DNC’s headquarters building in Washington, D.C.
STUPOR STUPID the AntiSemites exist in your party yet you are to IGNORANT to see reality !!!!!!!!!
Congressman Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee, has come under fire over previously undisclosed contacts with Reverend Louis Farrakhan, head of the anti-Semitic Nation of Islam movement.
Ron Halber, executive director of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington, said that Ellison “demonstrated exceedingly poor judgment by participating in a meeting with one of America’s most notorious anti-Semites and the leader of a regime that has called for Israel’s annihilation,” and therefore “should resign as deputy chairman of the Democratic Party.”
Ellison’s ouster is also being urged by the National Council of Young Israel (NCYI), whose membership includes more than 100 Orthodox synagogues, and the Coalition for Jewish Values (CJV), which represents several hundred Orthodox rabbis.
Anti-Defamation League (ADL) CEO Jonathan Greenblatt tweeted that Ellison’s participation in the Rouhani meeting along with Farrakhan was “extremely disturbing” and that “the presence of Louis Farrakhan should have been a red flag” for Ellison.
David Bernstein, president of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, wrote on Twitter that Ellison’s actions were “very disturbing…Dining with hatemongers is not OK.”
Ellison didn’t merely defend Farrakhan, he was a follower. He didn’t only appear as a local spokesman for the Nation of Islam, he appeared to defend a Minneapolis anti-Semite who said “Jews are among the most racist white people I know.” Ellison didn’t just support Stokely Carmichael’s right to speak at the University of Minnesota on free speech grounds, he argued that a man who claimed Zionists had joined the Nazis in killing Jews was a useful ideological counterpoint at that school. Ellison wasn’t just critical of “Israel’s policy toward Palestinians,” he was critical of the idea of Israel altogether.
When Mother Jones interviewed a classmate of Ellison’s who claimed he had gone around saying “European white Jews are trying to oppress minorities all over the world” and talked about “Jewish slave traders” — typical rhetoric for Nation of Islam types — there was no denial from the congressman’s office. The congressman only distanced himself from anti-Semites during his 2006 run for Congress, and then only when right-wing bloggers started pointing out his past.
STUPOR STUPID way to easy to point out AntiSEMITES within the Demorat RANKS
Resident Idiot Dude you got to check this out LMMFAO
A photo of former President Barack Obama and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan from 2005 surfaced on Thursday after more than a decade of a journalist keeping the encounter under wraps.
The photo of Obama and Farrakhan was taken at a Congressional Black Caucus meeting in 2005, but it never reached the public eye after the caucus asked the photographer, Askia Muhammad, to hand it over in fear that it would stain Obama’s political future.
“I sort of understood what was going on,” Muhammad told Talking Points Memo, who was allowed to print the picture with his permission. “I promised and made arrangements to give the picture to Leonard Farrakhan,” the leader’s chief-of-staff and son-in-law.
The Congressional Black Caucus allegedly contacted Muhammad in a “panic” shortly after the event and asked him to hand over the photograph. Muhammad said he made a copy of the photograph on his computer before he gave “the disk” from his camera over to a staff member.
“Realizing that I had given it up, I mean, it was sort of like a promise to keep the photograph secret,” the photographer said, while explaining he didn’t release his copy because he didn’t want to betray that promise.
“I was really, I guess, afraid of them,” he continued. Muhammad was afraid that someone would “break into his apartment” in search of the photo, like “that Watergate crap” if he was to ever release it.
During the 2008 presidential election, Farrakhan made headlines for his alleged ties to then-Senator Obama and his anti-Semitic remarks, which Obama denounced during a debate.
No way a Democrat would be viewed as an AntiSemite there STUPOR STUPID especially the face of Demorats and Obama lied about it. I would wander why you Socialist lie ! Can you explain it you ENLIGHTEN ONE ????????????
MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) — With just two days to go before Minnesota’s primary election, domestic abuse allegations are surfacing against U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison, a candidate for Minnesota attorney general.
The accusations came in a Facebook post published on Saturday night by Austin Monahan, the son of Ellison’s former girlfriend, Karen.
In it, he writes, in part, “In the middle of 2017, I was using my moms computer trying to download something and I clicked on a file. I found over 100 text and twitter messages and video almost 2 minutes long that showed Keith Ellison dragging my mama off the bed by her feet, screaming and calling her a f — b — and telling her to get the f — out of his house.”
STUPOR STUPID can you say Muslims are not abusers of women ?????????????
Keith Ellison, a U.S. House member and deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee, confronted allegations Sunday of domestic abuse from a former girlfriend.
The allegation that the physical abuse was caught on video was posted to Facebook late Saturday night by the woman's son, days before Minnesota's primary election, where Ellison is facing off against four other Democrats for the open state attorney general's seat.
Ellison has represented the Minneapolis-centered 5th District for six terms and was the perceived front-runner in the attorney general's race. In a written statement Sunday, Ellison denied the incident.
He said he was in a "long-term relationship" that ended in 2016 but he denied the allegation of abuse.
"I still care deeply for her well-being," he wrote. "This video does not exist because I never behaved in this way, and any characterization otherwise is false."
STUPOR STUPID a MOOSLIME DEMORAT would not lie RIGHT ???????????? LMMFAO